Could you try the CR below? Please explain your answer.
Q30. The ancient Nubians inhabited an area in which typhus occurs, yet surprisingly few of their skeletons show the usual evidence of this disease. The skeletons do show deposits of tetracycline, an antibiotic produced by a bacterium common in Nubian soil. This bacterium can flourish on the dried grain used for making two staples of the Nubian diet, beer and bread. Thus, tetracycline in their food probably explains the low incidence of typhus among ancient Nubians.
Which of the following is an assumption on which the argument relies?
A. Infectious diseases other than typhus to which the ancient Nubians were exposed are unaffected by tetracycline.
B. Tetracycline is not rendered ineffective as an antibiotic by exposure to the processes involved in making bread and beer.
C. Typhus cannot be transmitted by ingesting bread or beer contaminated with the infectious agents of this disease.
D. Bread and beer were the only items in the diet of the ancient Nubians which could have contained tetracycline.
E. Typhus is generally fatal.
Could you try the CR below? Please explain your answer.
Q30. The ancient Nubians inhabited an area in which typhus occurs, yet surprisingly few of their skeletons show the usual evidence of this disease. The skeletons do show deposits of tetracycline, an antibiotic produced by a bacterium common in Nubian soil. This bacterium can flourish on the dried grain used for making two staples of the Nubian diet, beer and bread. Thus, tetracycline in their food probably explains the low incidence of typhus among ancient Nubians.
Which of the following is an assumption on which the argument relies?
A. Infectious diseases other than typhus to which the ancient Nubians were exposed are unaffected by tetracycline. Not relevant to the question asked B. Tetracycline is not rendered ineffective as an antibiotic by exposure to the processes involved in making bread and beer. Correct C. Typhus cannot be transmitted by ingesting bread or beer contaminated with the infectious agents of this disease. Not relevant to the question asked D. Bread and beer were the only items in the diet of the ancient Nubians which could have contained tetracycline. Close but again not a valid assumption E. Typhus is generally fatal. Irrelevant
Agree with B.
B gives the correct assumption that Tetracycline is not rendered ineffective which otherwise would not corroborate the claim of low incidence of typhus among ancient Nubians consuming bread and beer.
Q30. The ancient Nubians inhabited an area in which typhus occurs, yet surprisingly few of their skeletons show the usual evidence of this disease. The skeletons do show deposits of tetracycline, an antibiotic produced by a bacterium common in Nubian soil. This bacterium can flourish on the dried grain used for making two staples of the Nubian diet, beer and bread. Thus, tetracycline in their food probably explains the low incidence of typhus among ancient Nubians.
Which of the following is an assumption on which the argument relies?
A. Infectious diseases other than typhus to which the ancient Nubians were exposed are unaffected by tetracycline.
B. Tetracycline is not rendered ineffective as an antibiotic by exposure to the processes involved in making bread and beer.
C. Typhus cannot be transmitted by ingesting bread or beer contaminated with the infectious agents of this disease.
D. Bread and beer were the only items in the diet of the ancient Nubians which could have contained tetracycline.
E. Typhus is generally fatal.
Guys, both B and E are compelling. I'm leaning more towards E. If Typhus is not fatal, one might not expect to find traces of this disease in the skeletons. So, E is the main assumption on which this whole argument is based. B is the secondary assumption (B could be true only if E is true).
comments are welcome.
_________________ for every person who doesn't try because he is
afraid of loosing , there is another person who
keeps making mistakes and succeeds..
Its B.
Hi shoonya,the problem with E is that we are not concerned whether the typhus is fatal or not...the main point of the argument is why only a few evidence of this disease is found in the skeletons...its no where mentioned in the passage that typhus is fatal.
By POE, my pick was C. But the Referenced (Not official ) key is B. I think B is correct because (now I know) that C is not relevant to the Question asked.
This is a real GMAT question, at least I think so.
Q30. The ancient Nubians inhabited an area in which typhus occurs, yet surprisingly few of their skeletons show the usual evidence of this disease. The skeletons do show deposits of tetracycline, an antibiotic produced by a bacterium common in Nubian soil. This bacterium can flourish on the dried grain used for making two staples of the Nubian diet, beer and bread. Thus, tetracycline in their food probably explains the low incidence of typhus among ancient Nubians.
Which of the following is an assumption on which the argument relies?
A. Infectious diseases other than typhus to which the ancient Nubians were exposed are unaffected by tetracycline.
B. Tetracycline is not rendered ineffective as an antibiotic by exposure to the processes involved in making bread and beer.
C. Typhus cannot be transmitted by ingesting bread or beer contaminated with the infectious agents of this disease.
D. Bread and beer were the only items in the diet of the ancient Nubians which could have contained tetracycline.
E. Typhus is generally fatal.
Vineet, you are right. E is nowhere mentioned in the passage. But, that's why we are looking for an assumption. The first line says
"The ancient Nubians inhabited an area in which typhus occurs, yet surprisingly few of their skeletons show the usual evidence of this disease".
and the last one says
"Thus, tetracycline in their food probably explains the low incidence of typhus among ancient Nubians"
This clearly shows that the scientists assume that this disease was fatal, but still are surprised that only a few skeletons show the sign of the disease. They conclude that becuase pf tetracycline, only a few show signs of typhus. In other words, only a few contracted and died of typhus.
_________________ for every person who doesn't try because he is
afraid of loosing , there is another person who
keeps making mistakes and succeeds..
Hi shoonya...E is too extreme...we cant say that typhus is fatal and caused the death...may be the people died because of another disease and could have typhus also...but not to the degree of fatality...
Q30. The ancient Nubians inhabited an area in which typhus occurs, yet surprisingly few of their skeletons show the usual evidence of this disease. The skeletons do show deposits of tetracycline, an antibiotic produced by a bacterium common in Nubian soil. This bacterium can flourish on the dried grain used for making two staples of the Nubian diet, beer and bread. Thus, tetracycline in their food probably explains the low incidence of typhus among ancient Nubians.
Which of the following is an assumption on which the argument relies?
A. Infectious diseases other than typhus to which the ancient Nubians were exposed are unaffected by tetracycline. B. Tetracycline is not rendered ineffective as an antibiotic by exposure to the processes involved in making bread and beer. C. Typhus cannot be transmitted by ingesting bread or beer contaminated with the infectious agents of this disease. D. Bread and beer were the only items in the diet of the ancient Nubians which could have contained tetracycline. E. Typhus is generally fatal.
Vineet, you are right. E is nowhere mentioned in the passage. But, that's why we are looking for an assumption. The first line says
"The ancient Nubians inhabited an area in which typhus occurs, yet surprisingly few of their skeletons show the usual evidence of this disease".
and the last one says
"Thus, tetracycline in their food probably explains the low incidence of typhus among ancient Nubians"
This clearly shows that the scientists assume that this disease was fatal, but still are surprised that only a few skeletons show the sign of the disease. They conclude that becuase pf tetracycline, only a few show signs of typhus. In other words, only a few contracted and died of typhus.
If we work backward from the last sentence, we clearly reach to B.
Guys, Q30. The ancient Nubians inhabited an area in which typhus occurs, yet surprisingly few of their skeletons show the usual evidence of this disease. The skeletons do show deposits of tetracycline, an antibiotic produced by a bacterium common in Nubian soil. This bacterium can flourish on the dried grain used for making two staples of the Nubian diet, beer and bread. Thus, tetracycline in their food probably explains the low incidence of typhus among ancient Nubians.
Which of the following is an assumption on which the argument relies? A. Infectious diseases other than typhus to which the ancient Nubians were exposed are unaffected by tetracycline. B. Tetracycline is not rendered ineffective as an antibiotic by exposure to the processes involved in making bread and beer. C. Typhus cannot be transmitted by ingesting bread or beer contaminated with the infectious agents of this disease. D. Bread and beer were the only items in the diet of the ancient Nubians which could have contained tetracycline. E. Typhus is generally fatal.
premise : few of Nubian skeletons show the usual evidence of typhus disease despite living in an area where thyphus occur
premise : skeletons do show deposits of tetracycline, an antibiotic produced by a bacteria premise : This bacterium can flourish on the dried grain used for making two staples of the Nubian diet, beer and bread.
conclusion : tetracycline in their food probably explains the low incidence of typhus.
A. Infectious diseases other than typhus to which the ancient Nubians were exposed are unaffected by tetracycline. OUT OF SCOPE we are only considered abt typhus B. Tetracycline is not rendered ineffective as an antibiotic by exposure to the processes involved in making bread and beer. if we negate this statement then conclusion falls apart. If teracycline is rendered ineffective then it would not prevent Thyhus and it could be the reason for low incidence. IMO correct answer C. Typhus cannot be transmitted by ingesting bread or beer contaminated with the infectious agents of this disease. We are dealing with tetracycline preventing thypus, thus transmission of thyhus is irrelevent. D. Bread and beer were the only items in the diet of the ancient Nubians which could have contained tetracycline. if we negate this statement : bread and beer were not the only item which contained tetracycline. tihs dosnot undermine the conclusion that tetracycline prevented thypus E. Typhus is generally fatal out of scope
Status: I will not stop until i realise my goal which is my dream too Joined: Thu Feb 25, 2010 Posts: 210 Location: Bangalore - Karnataka State - INDIA Schools: IIMA, IIMB, IIMC, ISB, IMD WE 1: Indian IT Services Giant -Hyderabad-INDIA - 6 Years WE 2: non-Bank Subsidiary of MNC Bank-Hyderabad-INDIA - 1 Year WE 3: MNC Bank - Bengaluru(Bangalore)-INDIA 1 Year and a long way to go Followers: 1
Search
MAYTue
Last Day $100 Off
$100 DiscountLast Day to Save!
Register
Login | Unanswered | Active topics | Tags list by forum
Oldest
