Last visit was: 25 Apr 2024, 00:23 It is currently 25 Apr 2024, 00:23

Close
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Close
Request Expert Reply
Confirm Cancel
SORT BY:
Date
Math Expert
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Posts: 92901
Own Kudos [?]: 618867 [17]
Given Kudos: 81588
Send PM
Most Helpful Reply
Math Expert
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Posts: 92901
Own Kudos [?]: 618867 [9]
Given Kudos: 81588
Send PM
General Discussion
avatar
Intern
Intern
Joined: 11 Nov 2014
Posts: 8
Own Kudos [?]: 7 [4]
Given Kudos: 20
Send PM
RC & DI Moderator
Joined: 02 Aug 2009
Status:Math and DI Expert
Posts: 11172
Own Kudos [?]: 31898 [42]
Given Kudos: 290
Send PM
Re: M21-35 [#permalink]
17
Kudos
25
Bookmarks
Expert Reply
samuraijack256 wrote:
Bunuel wrote:
Official Solution:


(1) The remainder when \(x\) is divided by 4 is 1. Given: \(x=4q+1\), so \(x\) cold be: 1, 5, 9, 13, 17, 21, 25, 29, 33, 37, 41, ... Not sufficient.

(2) The remainder when \(x\) is divided by 7 is 6. Given: \(x=7p+6\), so \(x\) cold be: 6, 13, 20, 27, 34, 41, ... Not sufficient.

(1)+(2) If \(x=13\) then the remainder is 1 but if \(x=41\) then the remainder is 2. Not sufficient.


Answer: E


Thanks for the explanation Bunuel. I too used the same method.

However, I was wondering if there is any faster method to determine the two numbers (13 and 41).

In the exam, my intent is to save as much time as possible and move on to the next question. In that state of mind, I will be inclined to just test the (say) first 5 numbers of the sequence. In the case of (1) above, that will be just 1, 5, 9, 13, 17
and for (2), this will be 6,13, 20, 27, 34.

Clearly, I will have missed the important numbers (13 and 41) which are key to swinging towards the correct answer.
Any suggestions?


Hi,
The faster method in these Qs is to find the first common multiple and, thereafter, add the LCM of two numbers..

In this case when we have got the first number as 13.. the next number will be 13 + lcm of 4 and 7=13+28=41..
the next 41+28=69 and so on...

so 13 gives remainder 1
41 gives remainder 2
69 gives remainder 0... and so on
hope it helped..
RC & DI Moderator
Joined: 02 Aug 2009
Status:Math and DI Expert
Posts: 11172
Own Kudos [?]: 31898 [4]
Given Kudos: 290
Send PM
Re: M21-35 [#permalink]
2
Kudos
2
Bookmarks
Expert Reply
samuraijack256 wrote:
Bunuel wrote:
Official Solution:


(1) The remainder when \(x\) is divided by 4 is 1. Given: \(x=4q+1\), so \(x\) cold be: 1, 5, 9, 13, 17, 21, 25, 29, 33, 37, 41, ... Not sufficient.

(2) The remainder when \(x\) is divided by 7 is 6. Given: \(x=7p+6\), so \(x\) cold be: 6, 13, 20, 27, 34, 41, ... Not sufficient.

(1)+(2) If \(x=13\) then the remainder is 1 but if \(x=41\) then the remainder is 2. Not sufficient.


Answer: E


Thanks for the explanation Bunuel. I too used the same method.

However, I was wondering if there is any faster method to determine the two numbers (13 and 41).



In the exam, my intent is to save as much time as possible and move on to the next question. In that state of mind, I will be inclined to just test the (say) first 5 numbers of the sequence. In the case of (1) above, that will be just 1, 5, 9, 13, 17
and for (2), this will be 6,13, 20, 27, 34.

Clearly, I will have missed the important numbers (13 and 41) which are key to swinging towards the correct answer.
Any suggestions?


another way would be to equate two eq from two statements..

\(x=4q+1\), \(x=7p+6\)...
\(4q+1=7p+6\)....
\(4q=7p+5\)....

now substitute p as 1,3,5... as p has to be odd to make the eq even ..
where we getan integer value of q... those are the numbers we rae looking for..
for ex
p=1,q=3... so number=4q+1=13..
p=3, q is not an int..
p=5, q=10 number =4q+1=41.. and so on
Intern
Intern
Joined: 12 Dec 2016
Posts: 4
Own Kudos [?]: [0]
Given Kudos: 2
Send PM
Re: M21-35 [#permalink]
I think this is a high-quality question and I agree with explanation.
Intern
Intern
Joined: 26 Feb 2018
Posts: 1
Own Kudos [?]: 0 [0]
Given Kudos: 11
Send PM
Re: M21-35 [#permalink]
Hi Bunuel- Can you please confirm if my logic is right while doing this exercise?

n = 4k + 1 -> Insuf

n = 7k + 6 -> Insuf

n = 28k + 13 (13 is the frist common number of 4k+1 and 7k+6).

As 28k is not divide by 3, the Reminder will change.

Thanks in advance!
Math Expert
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Posts: 92901
Own Kudos [?]: 618867 [2]
Given Kudos: 81588
Send PM
Re: M21-35 [#permalink]
1
Kudos
1
Bookmarks
Expert Reply
efr wrote:
Hi Bunuel- Can you please confirm if my logic is right while doing this exercise?

n = 4k + 1 -> Insuf

n = 7k + 6 -> Insuf

n = 28k + 13 (13 is the frist common number of 4k+1 and 7k+6).

As 28k is not divide by 3, the Reminder will change.

Thanks in advance!


Correct with small but crucial correction: quotient in all three cases (highlighted) will not be the same so you should not sue one variable for them (use p, q, k instead).
Math Expert
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Posts: 92901
Own Kudos [?]: 618867 [0]
Given Kudos: 81588
Send PM
Re: M21-35 [#permalink]
Expert Reply
I have edited the question and the solution by adding more details to enhance its clarity. I hope it is now easier to understand.
GMAT Club Bot
Re: M21-35 [#permalink]
Moderator:
Math Expert
92900 posts

Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group | Emoji artwork provided by EmojiOne