Last visit was: 24 Apr 2024, 13:32 It is currently 24 Apr 2024, 13:32

Close
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Close
Request Expert Reply
Confirm Cancel
SORT BY:
Date
Tags:
Show Tags
Hide Tags
Manager
Manager
Joined: 15 Nov 2006
Affiliations: SPG
Posts: 232
Own Kudos [?]: 3136 [234]
Given Kudos: 34
Send PM
Most Helpful Reply
Math Expert
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Posts: 92902
Own Kudos [?]: 618803 [77]
Given Kudos: 81588
Send PM
Math Expert
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Posts: 92902
Own Kudos [?]: 618803 [19]
Given Kudos: 81588
Send PM
General Discussion
avatar
Intern
Intern
Joined: 13 Feb 2010
Posts: 7
Own Kudos [?]: 7 [6]
Given Kudos: 0
Send PM
Re: is n equal to 2? [#permalink]
6
Kudos
Does two distinct factors mean that there are only two factors? If not, n can equal 20...5 and 4... 5-4=1. 1 is odd....

Oh..is it because if n=20, then 10 and 2 (which are also factors of 20) -- 10-2=8...even... not odd..

So does (2) mean that all factors of n that are different from each other, when subtracted, must be odd?

I don't have a solid understanding of the laws that would make this more concrete.
User avatar
Manager
Manager
Joined: 13 Dec 2009
Posts: 112
Own Kudos [?]: 927 [0]
Given Kudos: 13
Concentration: Consulting
 Q49  V40
Send PM
Re: is n equal to 2? [#permalink]
Bunuel wrote:
dimitri92 wrote:
If the integer n is greater than 1, is n equal to 2?
(1) n has exactly two positive factors.
(2) the difference of any two distinct positive factors of n is odd.


(1) Any prime satisfies this statement (2, 3, 5, ...), thus n may or may not equal to 2. Not sufficient.


Bunuel, I have a doubt regarding statement 1. Can \(\sqrt{2}\) be a factor here? If so then statement 1 is sufficient to say that \(n\) is not equal to \(2\), because \(2\) has factors \(1, \sqrt{2}\) and \(2\).
Math Expert
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Posts: 92902
Own Kudos [?]: 618803 [0]
Given Kudos: 81588
Send PM
Re: is n equal to 2? [#permalink]
Expert Reply
sidhu4u wrote:
Bunuel wrote:
dimitri92 wrote:
If the integer n is greater than 1, is n equal to 2?
(1) n has exactly two positive factors.
(2) the difference of any two distinct positive factors of n is odd.


(1) Any prime satisfies this statement (2, 3, 5, ...), thus n may or may not equal to 2. Not sufficient.


Bunuel, I have a doubt regarding statement 1. Can \(\sqrt{2}\) be a factor here? If so then statement 1 is sufficient to say that \(n\) is not equal to \(2\), because \(2\) has factors \(1, \sqrt{2}\) and \(2\).


Factor of an integer \(n\), is an integer which evenly divides \(n\) without leaving a remainder.

So \(\sqrt{2}\) is not a factor of any number.

Hope it helps.
User avatar
Retired Moderator
Joined: 04 Oct 2009
Status:2000 posts! I don't know whether I should feel great or sad about it! LOL
Posts: 767
Own Kudos [?]: 3945 [5]
Given Kudos: 109
Location: Peru
Concentration: Finance, SMEs, Developing countries, Public sector and non profit organizations
Schools:Harvard, Stanford, Wharton, MIT & HKS (Government)
GPA: 4.0
WE 1: Economic research
WE 2: Banking
WE 3: Government: Foreign Trade and SMEs
Send PM
Re: If the integer n is greater than 1 is n equal to 2 ? [#permalink]
3
Kudos
2
Bookmarks
+1 B

Let's analyze statement (2):
The difference of any two distinct positive factors of n is odd.
Thisn means that any pair of factors of n is compound by an even number and an odd number.
This also means that n is a prime number. Why? Because if n had more than two factors, the difference of at least one pair of factors would be even. For example, if there were an additional odd number, there would be a pair of numbers whose difference would be even.
So, if n is a prime number whose has an odd factor and a even factor, then we are talking about the number 2.

ANSWER: B

I think I deserve kudos 8-)
avatar
Manager
Manager
Joined: 26 Dec 2011
Posts: 78
Own Kudos [?]: 138 [2]
Given Kudos: 17
Send PM
Re: If the integer n is greater than 1, is n equal to 2? (1) n [#permalink]
2
Kudos
Hello Bunuel, Following the last post, I have the same doubt. Basically, if for example if I take number n = 6, then its two distinct factors 3 and 2 or factors 6 and 1 has the difference as odd... so n not equal to 2... can you please explain where am I wrong?
Math Expert
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Posts: 92902
Own Kudos [?]: 618803 [2]
Given Kudos: 81588
Send PM
Re: If the integer n is greater than 1, is n equal to 2? (1) n [#permalink]
2
Kudos
Expert Reply
pavanpuneet wrote:
Hello Bunuel, Following the last post, I have the same doubt. Basically, if for example if I take number n = 6, then its two distinct factors 3 and 2 or factors 6 and 1 has the difference as odd... so n not equal to 2... can you please explain where am I wrong?


The difference of ANY two distinct positive factors of n is odd: if n=6 then 6-2=4=even, hence n cannot be 6, or any other number but 2.

Hope it's clear.
User avatar
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
Joined: 22 Jul 2012
Status:Gonna rock this time!!!
Posts: 356
Own Kudos [?]: 166 [0]
Given Kudos: 562
Location: India
GMAT 1: 640 Q43 V34
GMAT 2: 630 Q47 V29
WE:Information Technology (Computer Software)
Send PM
Re: If the integer n is greater than 1, is n equal to 2? [#permalink]
Sir Bunuel,
I have a doubt here with regards to strategy:


(1) says : n has exactly two positive factors
This means that n is a prime no

(2) says: The difference between any two distinct positive factors is odd.

Now to plug in numbers to check the sufficiency of (2) , I didn't chose non prime numbers because (1) and (2) can never contradict each other.
So choosing 6,8 , 10 or any non prime no is basically stupidity. What do you say?

Regards,
Sach
Math Expert
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Posts: 92902
Own Kudos [?]: 618803 [0]
Given Kudos: 81588
Send PM
Re: If the integer n is greater than 1, is n equal to 2? [#permalink]
Expert Reply
sachindia wrote:
Sir Bunuel,
I have a doubt here with regards to strategy:


(1) says : n has exactly two positive factors
This means that n is a prime no

(2) says: The difference between any two distinct positive factors is odd.

Now to plug in numbers to check the sufficiency of (2) , I didn't chose non prime numbers because (1) and (2) can never contradict each other.
So choosing 6,8 , 10 or any non prime no is basically stupidity. What do you say?

Regards,
Sach


Yes, the statements in DS questions never contradict each other but your logic for testing numbers is not correct. Consider example below:

Is n=2?

(1) n is prime
(2) n is even

Now, if you test only even primes for the second statement you'll have that n could only be 2, since 2 is the only even prime. Therefore you'll get that (2) is sufficient, which is not.

Hope it's clear.
User avatar
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
Joined: 22 Jul 2012
Status:Gonna rock this time!!!
Posts: 356
Own Kudos [?]: 166 [0]
Given Kudos: 562
Location: India
GMAT 1: 640 Q43 V34
GMAT 2: 630 Q47 V29
WE:Information Technology (Computer Software)
Send PM
Re: If the integer n is greater than 1, is n equal to 2? [#permalink]
Bunuel wrote:
sachindia wrote:
Sir Bunuel,
I have a doubt here with regards to strategy:


(1) says : n has exactly two positive factors
This means that n is a prime no

(2) says: The difference between any two distinct positive factors is odd.

Now to plug in numbers to check the sufficiency of (2) , I didn't chose non prime numbers because (1) and (2) can never contradict each other.
So choosing 6,8 , 10 or any non prime no is basically stupidity. What do you say?

Regards,
Sach


Yes, the statements in DS questions never contradict each other but your logic for testing numbers is not correct. Consider example below:

Is n=2?

(1) n is prime
(2) n is even

Now, if you test only even primes for the second statement you'll have that n could only be 2, since 2 is the only even prime. Therefore you'll get that (2) is sufficient, which is not.

Hope it's clear.


Its not clear.
From what I understand
So if the 2 statements don;t contradict each other, I shuold still test numbers considering B as an individual statement without have any bearing of A.
Please confirm if my understnading is right.
Verbal Forum Moderator
Joined: 10 Oct 2012
Posts: 485
Own Kudos [?]: 3092 [2]
Given Kudos: 141
Send PM
Re: If the integer n is greater than 1, is n equal to 2? [#permalink]
2
Kudos
dimitri92 wrote:
If the integer n is greater than 1, is n equal to 2?

(1) n has exactly two positive factors.
(2) The difference of any two distinct positive factors of n is odd.


From F.S 1, we have that n has only two positive factors. Including the number itself and 1, this can only be a prime. Thus not sufficient as n can be any prime number.

From F.S 2, we have that the difference of any two positive factors is odd. We know that odd-even/even-odd = odd. So we know that "n" has at-least 2 factors , one of which is odd and one is even. Now we don't know whether this integer has only two factors. Say it has 3 factors. The third factor will either be odd or even. Now the presence of the statement any two distinct positive factors makes it essential that any two factors when subtracted give an odd integer. This will not be possible if we have any more factors than an odd factor and an even factor. Thus the number can only have only two factors, one odd and one even. This means the integer can only be 2. Thus, sufficient.

B.
Tutor
Joined: 16 Oct 2010
Posts: 14817
Own Kudos [?]: 64899 [3]
Given Kudos: 426
Location: Pune, India
Send PM
Re: If the integer n is greater than 1, is n equal to 2? [#permalink]
2
Kudos
Expert Reply
Sachin9 wrote:
Its not clear.
From what I understand
So if the 2 statements don;t contradict each other, I shuold still test numbers considering B as an individual statement without have any bearing of A.
Please confirm if my understnading is right.


Yes. The two statements cannot contradict each other. But when analyzing one statement, you should as good as forget the previous one. (In some cases, one statement can give you an idea of what numbers you should try and hence be helpful but you will need to try others as well)

Take a simple example:

Is n divisible by 6?

1. n is even
2. n is a multiple of 3

When you try out statement 1, say, you try out 3 numbers: 2, 4, 6. You say 2 and 4 are not divisible by 6 but 6 is. So not sufficient.

When you try out statement 2, will you try only even multiples of 3? No. You will try all multiples of 3. 3 is not divisible by 6 but 6 is. Not sufficient. If you try only even multiples of 3, you will see that all even multiples of 3 are divisible by 6. So your answer will be 'sufficient'. But mind you, here you have used both statements together hence you will mark (C). So in essence, you did not analyze statement 2 alone at all. Answer could have been (B), we will never know (in the actual test!).

Hence, when analyzing each statement, do not look at the data of the other one. In fact, as far as possible, I try to re-read the question stem between the two statements to remind me of exactly what I have to consider and to help me forget the data I have already considered (else you might use it sub-consciously) Sometimes, one statement helps you cheat by giving you ideas of numbers you should try in addition to others, that's all.
avatar
Intern
Intern
Joined: 08 Dec 2012
Posts: 27
Own Kudos [?]: 203 [0]
Given Kudos: 12
Send PM
Re: is n equal to 2? [#permalink]
Bunuel wrote:
dimitri92 wrote:
If the integer n is greater than 1, is n equal to 2?
(1) n has exactly two positive factors.
(2) the difference of any two distinct positive factors of n is odd.


(1) Any prime satisfies this statement (2, 3, 5, ...), thus n may or may not equal to 2. Not sufficient.

(2) n has at least following factors: 1 and n (the number itself). As given that "the difference of any two distinct positive factors of n is odd", then must be true that: \(n-1=odd\) --> \(n=odd+1=even\). Can \(n\) be even number more than 2? No, because if \(n=even>2\) it obviously has 2 as a factor and again as "the difference of any two distinct positive factors of n is odd", then n-2 must be odd, but \(n-2=even-2=even\neq{odd}\). Hence \(n=2\). Sufficient.

OR: "the difference of any two distinct positive factors of n is odd" means that number must have only one odd factor and only one even factor. (If odd factors, (or even factors) >1, then the difference of the pair of two odd factors (or even factors) will be even not odd). Only number to have only one odd and only one even factor is 2. Sufficient.

Answer: B.


Maybe a silly doubt...When you say a number has 2 factors or 4 factors..is 1 also included in it?I usually exclude 1 when counting factors..pls cllarify..
Math Expert
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Posts: 92902
Own Kudos [?]: 618803 [2]
Given Kudos: 81588
Send PM
Re: is n equal to 2? [#permalink]
2
Kudos
Expert Reply
SUNGMAT710 wrote:
Bunuel wrote:
dimitri92 wrote:
If the integer n is greater than 1, is n equal to 2?
(1) n has exactly two positive factors.
(2) the difference of any two distinct positive factors of n is odd.


(1) Any prime satisfies this statement (2, 3, 5, ...), thus n may or may not equal to 2. Not sufficient.

(2) n has at least following factors: 1 and n (the number itself). As given that "the difference of any two distinct positive factors of n is odd", then must be true that: \(n-1=odd\) --> \(n=odd+1=even\). Can \(n\) be even number more than 2? No, because if \(n=even>2\) it obviously has 2 as a factor and again as "the difference of any two distinct positive factors of n is odd", then n-2 must be odd, but \(n-2=even-2=even\neq{odd}\). Hence \(n=2\). Sufficient.

OR: "the difference of any two distinct positive factors of n is odd" means that number must have only one odd factor and only one even factor. (If odd factors, (or even factors) >1, then the difference of the pair of two odd factors (or even factors) will be even not odd). Only number to have only one odd and only one even factor is 2. Sufficient.

Answer: B.


Maybe a silly doubt...When you say a number has 2 factors or 4 factors..is 1 also included in it?I usually exclude 1 when counting factors..pls cllarify..


1 is a factor of every integer, thus it's also included (the same way n is a factor of n, so n is also included).

Does this make sense?
User avatar
Intern
Intern
Joined: 22 Jul 2014
Posts: 17
Own Kudos [?]: 7 [0]
Given Kudos: 13
GMAT 1: 450 Q38 V12
WE:Information Technology (Computer Software)
Send PM
Re: If the integer n is greater than 1, is n equal to 2? [#permalink]
Bunuel wrote:
amp0201 wrote:
If the integer n is greater than 1, is n equal to 2?
(1) n has exactly two positive factors
(2) The difference between any two distinct positive factors is odd.

I just have one question related to wording of option (2). Should it mention as two distinct prime factors instead of two distinct positive factors?

Please provide answer with explanation.


Merging similar topics. Please ask if anything remains unclear.

P.S. The wording of the second statement is correct.


Hi Bunnel,

In this question , if the statement was " If n is an integer, is n equal to 2? " should we consider 0 as an integer in this case ?? is 0 an positive integer ?

Thanks,
Math Expert
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Posts: 92902
Own Kudos [?]: 618803 [0]
Given Kudos: 81588
Send PM
Re: If the integer n is greater than 1, is n equal to 2? [#permalink]
Expert Reply
prashd wrote:
Bunuel wrote:
amp0201 wrote:
If the integer n is greater than 1, is n equal to 2?
(1) n has exactly two positive factors
(2) The difference between any two distinct positive factors is odd.

I just have one question related to wording of option (2). Should it mention as two distinct prime factors instead of two distinct positive factors?

Please provide answer with explanation.


Merging similar topics. Please ask if anything remains unclear.

P.S. The wording of the second statement is correct.


Hi Bunnel,

In this question , if the statement was " If n is an integer, is n equal to 2? " should we consider 0 as an integer in this case ?? is 0 an positive integer ?

Thanks,


0 is certainly an integer but it's neither positive nor negative.

Foe more Numper Properties tips check: number-properties-tips-and-hints-174996.html

Hope it helps.
Current Student
Joined: 10 Mar 2013
Posts: 360
Own Kudos [?]: 2696 [0]
Given Kudos: 200
Location: Germany
Concentration: Finance, Entrepreneurship
GMAT 1: 580 Q46 V24
GPA: 3.7
WE:Marketing (Telecommunications)
Send PM
Re: If the integer n is greater than 1, is n equal to 2? [#permalink]
dimitri92 wrote:
If the integer n is greater than 1, is n equal to 2?

(1) n has exactly two positive factors.
(2) The difference of any two distinct positive factors of n is odd.


This one was very tough, but I got it right and could observe interesting number properties regarding this question.

(1) It says that n is a prime number. Clearly not sufficient
(2) Every odd > 1 number has ONLY odd factors, so the difference between factors will be always EVEN (ODD-ODD=EVEN)
Every even numer > 2 has both ODD and EVEN (# of even factors ≥ 2) factors, so their difference can be ODD and/or EVEN
And ONLY the difference of any two distinct positive factors of 2 is odd

Math experts please correct me if I'm wrong.
Director
Director
Joined: 26 Oct 2016
Posts: 510
Own Kudos [?]: 3378 [6]
Given Kudos: 877
Location: United States
Concentration: Marketing, International Business
Schools: HBS '19
GMAT 1: 770 Q51 V44
GPA: 4
WE:Education (Education)
Send PM
Re: If the integer n is greater than 1, is n equal to 2? [#permalink]
5
Kudos
1
Bookmarks
(1)
this is a disguised way of saying 'n is prime'
therefore, insufficient

(2)
this says any two factors. that means any two factors - i.e., ALL pairs of factors have an odd difference.
there's only one way to do this: one odd factor and one even factor. (as soon as you get 2 odd factors or 2 even factors, you get an even difference by subtracting them.)
for example take foll numbers:
factors of 3 = 1,3 3-1=even
factors of 4= 4,1,2 4-1=odd but 4-2=even
factors of 10 = 10, 1, 5, 2 10-1=odd; 10-2=even
so on and so forth
2 is the only # with only 1 odd factor and only 1 even factor.
therefore, sufficient
GMAT Club Bot
Re: If the integer n is greater than 1, is n equal to 2? [#permalink]
 1   2   
Moderator:
Math Expert
92902 posts

Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group | Emoji artwork provided by EmojiOne