Aug 24 07:00 AM PDT  09:00 AM PDT Learn reading strategies that can help even nonvoracious reader to master GMAT RC Aug 25 09:00 AM PDT  12:00 PM PDT Join a FREE 1day verbal workshop and learn how to ace the Verbal section with the best tips and strategies. Limited for the first 99 registrants. Register today! Aug 25 08:00 PM PDT  11:00 PM PDT Exclusive offer! Get 400+ Practice Questions, 25 Video lessons and 6+ Webinars for FREE. Aug 28 08:00 AM PDT  09:00 AM PDT Join a FREE live webinar with examPAL and Admissionado and learn how to master GMAT Critical Reasoning questions and the 6pointed star of MBA application essay glory. Save your spot today! Aug 30 08:00 PM PDT  11:00 PM PDT We'll be posting questions in DS/PS/SC/CR in competition mode. Detailed and quickest solution will get kudos. Will be collecting new links to all questions in this topic. Here you can also check links to fresh questions posted.
Author 
Message 
TAGS:

Hide Tags

Senior Manager
Affiliations: SPG
Joined: 15 Nov 2006
Posts: 295

If the integer n is greater than 1, is n equal to 2?
[#permalink]
Show Tags
Updated on: 10 Apr 2012, 10:44
Question Stats:
54% (01:23) correct 46% (01:21) wrong based on 934 sessions
HideShow timer Statistics
If the integer n is greater than 1, is n equal to 2? (1) n has exactly two positive factors. (2) The difference of any two distinct positive factors of n is odd.
Official Answer and Stats are available only to registered users. Register/ Login.
Originally posted by dimitri92 on 23 May 2010, 21:28.
Last edited by Bunuel on 10 Apr 2012, 10:44, edited 2 times in total.
Edited the question and added the OA




Math Expert
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Posts: 57281

If the integer n is greater than 1, is n equal to 2?
[#permalink]
Show Tags
24 May 2010, 01:27
If the integer n is greater than 1, is n equal to 2?(1) Any prime satisfies this statement (2, 3, 5, ...), thus n may or may not equal to 2. Not sufficient. (2) n has at least following factors: 1 and n (the number itself). As given that "the difference of any two distinct positive factors of n is odd", then must be true that: \(n1=odd\) > \(n=odd+1=even\). Can \(n\) be even number more than 2? No, because if \(n=even>2\) it obviously has 2 as a factor and again as "the difference of any two distinct positive factors of n is odd", then n2 must be odd, but \(n2=even2=even\neq{odd}\). Hence \(n=2\). Sufficient. OR: "the difference of any two distinct positive factors of n is odd" means that number must have only one odd factor and only one even factor. (If odd factors, (or even factors) >1, then the difference of the pair of two odd factors (or even factors) will be even not odd). Only number to have only one odd and only one even factor is 2. Sufficient. Answer: B.
_________________




Intern
Joined: 13 Feb 2010
Posts: 8

Re: is n equal to 2?
[#permalink]
Show Tags
24 May 2010, 18:31
Does two distinct factors mean that there are only two factors? If not, n can equal 20...5 and 4... 54=1. 1 is odd....
Oh..is it because if n=20, then 10 and 2 (which are also factors of 20)  102=8...even... not odd..
So does (2) mean that all factors of n that are different from each other, when subtracted, must be odd?
I don't have a solid understanding of the laws that would make this more concrete.



Math Expert
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Posts: 57281

Re: is n equal to 2?
[#permalink]
Show Tags
25 May 2010, 03:54
melonchopper wrote: Does two distinct factors mean that there are only two factors? If not, n can equal 20...5 and 4... 54=1. 1 is odd....
Oh..is it because if n=20, then 10 and 2 (which are also factors of 20)  102=8...even... not odd..
So does (2) mean that all factors of n that are different from each other, when subtracted, must be odd?
I don't have a solid understanding of the laws that would make this more concrete. Statement (2): "the difference of ANY two distinct positive factors of n is odd", which means that when we pick ANY two distinct factors of n their difference must be odd. So for n=20. Factors of n are: 1, 2, 4, 5, 10 and 20. 201=odd but 2010=even, so n could not be 20. Again: "the difference of ANY two distinct positive factors of n is odd" means that number must have only one odd factor and only one even factor. (If odd factors, (or even factors) >1, then the difference of the pair of two odd factors (or even factors) will be even not odd). Only number to have only one odd and only one even factor is 2. Hope it's clear.
_________________



Manager
Joined: 13 Dec 2009
Posts: 210

Re: is n equal to 2?
[#permalink]
Show Tags
05 Jun 2010, 04:27
Bunuel wrote: dimitri92 wrote: If the integer n is greater than 1, is n equal to 2? (1) n has exactly two positive factors. (2) the difference of any two distinct positive factors of n is odd. (1) Any prime satisfies this statement (2, 3, 5, ...), thus n may or may not equal to 2. Not sufficient. Bunuel, I have a doubt regarding statement 1. Can \(\sqrt{2}\) be a factor here? If so then statement 1 is sufficient to say that \(n\) is not equal to \(2\), because \(2\) has factors \(1, \sqrt{2}\) and \(2\).
_________________



Math Expert
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Posts: 57281

Re: is n equal to 2?
[#permalink]
Show Tags
05 Jun 2010, 05:18
sidhu4u wrote: Bunuel wrote: dimitri92 wrote: If the integer n is greater than 1, is n equal to 2? (1) n has exactly two positive factors. (2) the difference of any two distinct positive factors of n is odd. (1) Any prime satisfies this statement (2, 3, 5, ...), thus n may or may not equal to 2. Not sufficient. Bunuel, I have a doubt regarding statement 1. Can \(\sqrt{2}\) be a factor here? If so then statement 1 is sufficient to say that \(n\) is not equal to \(2\), because \(2\) has factors \(1, \sqrt{2}\) and \(2\). Factor of an integer \(n\), is an integer which evenly divides \(n\) without leaving a remainder. So \(\sqrt{2}\) is not a factor of any number. Hope it helps.
_________________



Retired Moderator
Status: 2000 posts! I don't know whether I should feel great or sad about it! LOL
Joined: 04 Oct 2009
Posts: 1037
Location: Peru
Schools: Harvard, Stanford, Wharton, MIT & HKS (Government)
WE 1: Economic research
WE 2: Banking
WE 3: Government: Foreign Trade and SMEs

Re: If the integer n is greater than 1 is n equal to 2 ?
[#permalink]
Show Tags
31 Jan 2012, 10:34
+1 B Let's analyze statement (2): The difference of any two distinct positive factors of n is odd. Thisn means that any pair of factors of n is compound by an even number and an odd number. This also means that n is a prime number. Why? Because if n had more than two factors, the difference of at least one pair of factors would be even. For example, if there were an additional odd number, there would be a pair of numbers whose difference would be even. So, if n is a prime number whose has an odd factor and a even factor, then we are talking about the number 2. ANSWER: B I think I deserve kudos
_________________
"Life’s battle doesn’t always go to stronger or faster men; but sooner or later the man who wins is the one who thinks he can."My Integrated Reasoning Logbook / Diary: http://gmatclub.com/forum/myirlogbookdiary133264.html GMAT Club Premium Membership  big benefits and savings



Manager
Joined: 26 Dec 2011
Posts: 91

Re: If the integer n is greater than 1, is n equal to 2? (1) n
[#permalink]
Show Tags
17 Mar 2012, 05:39
Hello Bunuel, Following the last post, I have the same doubt. Basically, if for example if I take number n = 6, then its two distinct factors 3 and 2 or factors 6 and 1 has the difference as odd... so n not equal to 2... can you please explain where am I wrong?



Math Expert
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Posts: 57281

Re: If the integer n is greater than 1, is n equal to 2? (1) n
[#permalink]
Show Tags
17 Mar 2012, 06:30
pavanpuneet wrote: Hello Bunuel, Following the last post, I have the same doubt. Basically, if for example if I take number n = 6, then its two distinct factors 3 and 2 or factors 6 and 1 has the difference as odd... so n not equal to 2... can you please explain where am I wrong? The difference of ANY two distinct positive factors of n is odd: if n=6 then 62=4=even, hence n cannot be 6, or any other number but 2. Hope it's clear.
_________________



Senior Manager
Status: Gonna rock this time!!!
Joined: 22 Jul 2012
Posts: 431
Location: India
GMAT 1: 640 Q43 V34 GMAT 2: 630 Q47 V29
WE: Information Technology (Computer Software)

Re: If the integer n is greater than 1, is n equal to 2?
[#permalink]
Show Tags
19 Oct 2012, 23:43
Sir Bunuel, I have a doubt here with regards to strategy: (1) says : n has exactly two positive factors This means that n is a prime no (2) says: The difference between any two distinct positive factors is odd. Now to plug in numbers to check the sufficiency of (2) , I didn't chose non prime numbers because (1) and (2) can never contradict each other. So choosing 6,8 , 10 or any non prime no is basically stupidity. What do you say? Regards, Sach
_________________
hope is a good thing, maybe the best of things. And no good thing ever dies.Who says you need a 700 ?Check this out : http://gmatclub.com/forum/whosaysyouneeda149706.html#p1201595My GMAT Journey : http://gmatclub.com/forum/endofmygmatjourney149328.html#p1197992



Math Expert
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Posts: 57281

Re: If the integer n is greater than 1, is n equal to 2?
[#permalink]
Show Tags
23 Oct 2012, 07:27
sachindia wrote: Sir Bunuel, I have a doubt here with regards to strategy:
(1) says : n has exactly two positive factors This means that n is a prime no
(2) says: The difference between any two distinct positive factors is odd.
Now to plug in numbers to check the sufficiency of (2) , I didn't chose non prime numbers because (1) and (2) can never contradict each other. So choosing 6,8 , 10 or any non prime no is basically stupidity. What do you say?
Regards, Sach Yes, the statements in DS questions never contradict each other but your logic for testing numbers is not correct. Consider example below: Is n=2? (1) n is prime (2) n is even Now, if you test only even primes for the second statement you'll have that n could only be 2, since 2 is the only even prime. Therefore you'll get that (2) is sufficient, which is not. Hope it's clear.
_________________



Senior Manager
Status: Gonna rock this time!!!
Joined: 22 Jul 2012
Posts: 431
Location: India
GMAT 1: 640 Q43 V34 GMAT 2: 630 Q47 V29
WE: Information Technology (Computer Software)

Re: If the integer n is greater than 1, is n equal to 2?
[#permalink]
Show Tags
26 Oct 2012, 06:07
Bunuel wrote: sachindia wrote: Sir Bunuel, I have a doubt here with regards to strategy:
(1) says : n has exactly two positive factors This means that n is a prime no
(2) says: The difference between any two distinct positive factors is odd.
Now to plug in numbers to check the sufficiency of (2) , I didn't chose non prime numbers because (1) and (2) can never contradict each other. So choosing 6,8 , 10 or any non prime no is basically stupidity. What do you say?
Regards, Sach Yes, the statements in DS questions never contradict each other but your logic for testing numbers is not correct. Consider example below: Is n=2? (1) n is prime (2) n is even Now, if you test only even primes for the second statement you'll have that n could only be 2, since 2 is the only even prime. Therefore you'll get that (2) is sufficient, which is not. Hope it's clear. Its not clear. From what I understand So if the 2 statements don;t contradict each other, I shuold still test numbers considering B as an individual statement without have any bearing of A. Please confirm if my understnading is right.
_________________
hope is a good thing, maybe the best of things. And no good thing ever dies.Who says you need a 700 ?Check this out : http://gmatclub.com/forum/whosaysyouneeda149706.html#p1201595My GMAT Journey : http://gmatclub.com/forum/endofmygmatjourney149328.html#p1197992



Verbal Forum Moderator
Joined: 10 Oct 2012
Posts: 603

Re: If the integer n is greater than 1, is n equal to 2?
[#permalink]
Show Tags
26 Feb 2013, 05:29
dimitri92 wrote: If the integer n is greater than 1, is n equal to 2?
(1) n has exactly two positive factors. (2) The difference of any two distinct positive factors of n is odd. From F.S 1, we have that n has only two positive factors. Including the number itself and 1, this can only be a prime. Thus not sufficient as n can be any prime number. From F.S 2, we have that the difference of any two positive factors is odd. We know that oddeven/evenodd = odd. So we know that "n" has atleast 2 factors , one of which is odd and one is even. Now we don't know whether this integer has only two factors. Say it has 3 factors. The third factor will either be odd or even. Now the presence of the statement any two distinct positive factors makes it essential that any two factors when subtracted give an odd integer. This will not be possible if we have any more factors than an odd factor and an even factor. Thus the number can only have only two factors, one odd and one even. This means the integer can only be 2. Thus, sufficient. B.
_________________



Veritas Prep GMAT Instructor
Joined: 16 Oct 2010
Posts: 9554
Location: Pune, India

Re: If the integer n is greater than 1, is n equal to 2?
[#permalink]
Show Tags
26 Feb 2013, 20:40
Sachin9 wrote: Its not clear. From what I understand So if the 2 statements don;t contradict each other, I shuold still test numbers considering B as an individual statement without have any bearing of A. Please confirm if my understnading is right. Yes. The two statements cannot contradict each other. But when analyzing one statement, you should as good as forget the previous one. (In some cases, one statement can give you an idea of what numbers you should try and hence be helpful but you will need to try others as well) Take a simple example: Is n divisible by 6? 1. n is even 2. n is a multiple of 3 When you try out statement 1, say, you try out 3 numbers: 2, 4, 6. You say 2 and 4 are not divisible by 6 but 6 is. So not sufficient. When you try out statement 2, will you try only even multiples of 3? No. You will try all multiples of 3. 3 is not divisible by 6 but 6 is. Not sufficient. If you try only even multiples of 3, you will see that all even multiples of 3 are divisible by 6. So your answer will be 'sufficient'. But mind you, here you have used both statements together hence you will mark (C). So in essence, you did not analyze statement 2 alone at all. Answer could have been (B), we will never know (in the actual test!). Hence, when analyzing each statement, do not look at the data of the other one. In fact, as far as possible, I try to reread the question stem between the two statements to remind me of exactly what I have to consider and to help me forget the data I have already considered (else you might use it subconsciously) Sometimes, one statement helps you cheat by giving you ideas of numbers you should try in addition to others, that's all.
_________________
Karishma Veritas Prep GMAT Instructor
Learn more about how Veritas Prep can help you achieve a great GMAT score by checking out their GMAT Prep Options >



Intern
Joined: 08 Dec 2012
Posts: 35

Re: is n equal to 2?
[#permalink]
Show Tags
10 Sep 2013, 03:15
Bunuel wrote: dimitri92 wrote: If the integer n is greater than 1, is n equal to 2? (1) n has exactly two positive factors. (2) the difference of any two distinct positive factors of n is odd. (1) Any prime satisfies this statement (2, 3, 5, ...), thus n may or may not equal to 2. Not sufficient. (2) n has at least following factors: 1 and n (the number itself). As given that "the difference of any two distinct positive factors of n is odd", then must be true that: \(n1=odd\) > \(n=odd+1=even\). Can \(n\) be even number more than 2? No, because if \(n=even>2\) it obviously has 2 as a factor and again as "the difference of any two distinct positive factors of n is odd", then n2 must be odd, but \(n2=even2=even\neq{odd}\). Hence \(n=2\). Sufficient. OR: "the difference of any two distinct positive factors of n is odd" means that number must have only one odd factor and only one even factor. (If odd factors, (or even factors) >1, then the difference of the pair of two odd factors (or even factors) will be even not odd). Only number to have only one odd and only one even factor is 2. Sufficient. Answer: B. Maybe a silly doubt...When you say a number has 2 factors or 4 factors..is 1 also included in it?I usually exclude 1 when counting factors..pls cllarify..



Math Expert
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Posts: 57281

Re: is n equal to 2?
[#permalink]
Show Tags
10 Sep 2013, 03:22
SUNGMAT710 wrote: Bunuel wrote: dimitri92 wrote: If the integer n is greater than 1, is n equal to 2? (1) n has exactly two positive factors. (2) the difference of any two distinct positive factors of n is odd. (1) Any prime satisfies this statement (2, 3, 5, ...), thus n may or may not equal to 2. Not sufficient. (2) n has at least following factors: 1 and n (the number itself). As given that "the difference of any two distinct positive factors of n is odd", then must be true that: \(n1=odd\) > \(n=odd+1=even\). Can \(n\) be even number more than 2? No, because if \(n=even>2\) it obviously has 2 as a factor and again as "the difference of any two distinct positive factors of n is odd", then n2 must be odd, but \(n2=even2=even\neq{odd}\). Hence \(n=2\). Sufficient. OR: "the difference of any two distinct positive factors of n is odd" means that number must have only one odd factor and only one even factor. (If odd factors, (or even factors) >1, then the difference of the pair of two odd factors (or even factors) will be even not odd). Only number to have only one odd and only one even factor is 2. Sufficient. Answer: B. Maybe a silly doubt...When you say a number has 2 factors or 4 factors..is 1 also included in it?I usually exclude 1 when counting factors..pls cllarify.. 1 is a factor of every integer, thus it's also included (the same way n is a factor of n, so n is also included). Does this make sense?
_________________



Intern
Joined: 22 Jul 2014
Posts: 21
WE: Information Technology (Computer Software)

Re: If the integer n is greater than 1, is n equal to 2?
[#permalink]
Show Tags
28 Nov 2014, 07:15
Bunuel wrote: amp0201 wrote: If the integer n is greater than 1, is n equal to 2? (1) n has exactly two positive factors (2) The difference between any two distinct positive factors is odd.
I just have one question related to wording of option (2). Should it mention as two distinct prime factors instead of two distinct positive factors?
Please provide answer with explanation. Merging similar topics. Please ask if anything remains unclear. P.S. The wording of the second statement is correct. Hi Bunnel, In this question , if the statement was " If n is an integer, is n equal to 2? " should we consider 0 as an integer in this case ?? is 0 an positive integer ? Thanks,
_________________
Failures are stepping stones to success !!!



Math Expert
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Posts: 57281

Re: If the integer n is greater than 1, is n equal to 2?
[#permalink]
Show Tags
28 Nov 2014, 08:24
prashd wrote: Bunuel wrote: amp0201 wrote: If the integer n is greater than 1, is n equal to 2? (1) n has exactly two positive factors (2) The difference between any two distinct positive factors is odd.
I just have one question related to wording of option (2). Should it mention as two distinct prime factors instead of two distinct positive factors?
Please provide answer with explanation. Merging similar topics. Please ask if anything remains unclear. P.S. The wording of the second statement is correct. Hi Bunnel, In this question , if the statement was " If n is an integer, is n equal to 2? " should we consider 0 as an integer in this case ?? is 0 an positive integer ? Thanks, 0 is certainly an integer but it's neither positive nor negative. Foe more Numper Properties tips check: numberpropertiestipsandhints174996.htmlHope it helps.
_________________



Senior Manager
Joined: 10 Mar 2013
Posts: 482
Location: Germany
Concentration: Finance, Entrepreneurship
GPA: 3.88
WE: Information Technology (Consulting)

Re: If the integer n is greater than 1, is n equal to 2?
[#permalink]
Show Tags
11 Jan 2016, 16:21
dimitri92 wrote: If the integer n is greater than 1, is n equal to 2?
(1) n has exactly two positive factors. (2) The difference of any two distinct positive factors of n is odd. This one was very tough, but I got it right and could observe interesting number properties regarding this question. (1) It says that n is a prime number. Clearly not sufficient (2) Every odd > 1 number has ONLY odd factors, so the difference between factors will be always EVEN (ODDODD=EVEN) Every even numer > 2 has both ODD and EVEN (# of even factors ≥ 2) factors, so their difference can be ODD and/or EVEN And ONLY the difference of any two distinct positive factors of 2 is odd Math experts please correct me if I'm wrong.
_________________
When you’re up, your friends know who you are. When you’re down, you know who your friends are.
Share some Kudos, if my posts help you. Thank you !
800Score ONLY QUANT CAT1 51, CAT2 50, CAT3 50 GMAT PREP 670 MGMAT CAT 630 KAPLAN CAT 660



Director
Joined: 26 Oct 2016
Posts: 624
Location: United States
Concentration: Marketing, International Business
GPA: 4
WE: Education (Education)

Re: If the integer n is greater than 1, is n equal to 2?
[#permalink]
Show Tags
26 Jan 2017, 19:04
(1) this is a disguised way of saying 'n is prime' therefore, insufficient (2) this says any two factors. that means any two factors  i.e., ALL pairs of factors have an odd difference. there's only one way to do this: one odd factor and one even factor. (as soon as you get 2 odd factors or 2 even factors, you get an even difference by subtracting them.) for example take foll numbers: factors of 3 = 1,3 31=even factors of 4= 4,1,2 41=odd but 42=even factors of 10 = 10, 1, 5, 2 101=odd; 102=even so on and so forth 2 is the only # with only 1 odd factor and only 1 even factor. therefore, sufficient
_________________
Thanks & Regards, Anaira Mitch




Re: If the integer n is greater than 1, is n equal to 2?
[#permalink]
26 Jan 2017, 19:04



Go to page
1 2
Next
[ 21 posts ]



