joshnsit
carcass
At first instance I pick B but A is better.
The passage dis not mention anything about other companies, rivals and so on....BUT only that is profitable. The weak point is: we have some clue that say to us the reason why or better, a casual conclusion between that 2 elements and the rise of profits ?? No, so -> A is the answer.
however B is a good distraction
@carcass
The point here is that we are talking of more profitability. As mentioned in the stimulus conclusion:
Employee ownership and a good advertising agency have combined to make Mainline [highlight]more profitable[/highlight].
One more correction I would like to make is that in strengthening and weakening, you can always introduce new elements in picture, so deleting them on the basis of being external would eliminate valid choices.
Upon another look, I found that B talks only about one component ie "employee-owned airlines" and completely neglects QualiCo contribution. That seems to be a little minus in comparing B with A. But, I am still looking for a strong reason to kick B out.
CR champions --> F1 F1
I believe that you are looking at the question in the wrong way (in my opinion)
here the point is NOT more profitable, less profitable and so on: this is not the real point.
On one hand we know that the company earn more money, ok, that say.
On the other hand the stimulus says: Which of the following
best describes the weak point in the argument above ?
choice B suggest in somehow a general reason which demolishes the argument, instead A says: 2 (employee-owned)+2(QualiCo)= 4 (more profitable, little more profitable....who cares).......no evidence !!!!!