Last visit was: 18 Nov 2025, 17:21 It is currently 18 Nov 2025, 17:21
Close
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Close
Request Expert Reply
Confirm Cancel
User avatar
edwin.que
Joined: 27 Oct 2023
Last visit: 30 Apr 2024
Posts: 14
Own Kudos:
802
 [120]
Posts: 14
Kudos: 802
 [120]
5
Kudos
Add Kudos
115
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Most Helpful Reply
User avatar
Bunuel
User avatar
Math Expert
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Last visit: 18 Nov 2025
Posts: 105,355
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 99,964
Products:
Expert
Expert reply
Active GMAT Club Expert! Tag them with @ followed by their username for a faster response.
Posts: 105,355
Kudos: 778,072
 [26]
18
Kudos
Add Kudos
8
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
KarishmaB
Joined: 16 Oct 2010
Last visit: 18 Nov 2025
Posts: 16,265
Own Kudos:
76,982
 [5]
Given Kudos: 482
Location: Pune, India
Expert
Expert reply
Active GMAT Club Expert! Tag them with @ followed by their username for a faster response.
Posts: 16,265
Kudos: 76,982
 [5]
5
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
General Discussion
User avatar
VivekSri
Joined: 01 May 2022
Last visit: 17 Nov 2025
Posts: 468
Own Kudos:
721
 [17]
Given Kudos: 117
Location: India
WE:Engineering (Consulting)
Posts: 468
Kudos: 721
 [17]
14
Kudos
Add Kudos
3
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
edwin.que
If Machine X, working alone at its constant rate, performs half of a certain task and then Machine Y, working alone at its constant rate, performs the rest of the task, the whole task will take a total of 16 hours. How many hours will it take machine X, working alone at its constant rate, to perform the task?

(1) Working together at their respective constant rates, machines X and Y perform the task in 6 hours.

(2) Machine X has a faster rate than machine Y.

A. Statement (1) ALONE is sufficient, but statement (2) alone is not sufficient.
B. Statement (2) ALONE is sufficient, but statement (1) alone is not sufficient.
C. Both statement TOGETHER are sufficient, but NEITHER statement ALONE is sufficient.
D. EACH statement ALONE is sufficient.
E. Statements (1) and (2) TOGETHER are NOT sufficient.

OA IS C

Posted from my mobile device
Attachments

1000057282.jpg
1000057282.jpg [ 2.73 MiB | Viewed 28275 times ]

User avatar
vassivass
Joined: 28 Nov 2023
Last visit: 07 Dec 2023
Posts: 1
Given Kudos: 1
Posts: 1
Kudos: 0
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Hello could someone provide another solution please, I struggle to understand this one. Thank you
User avatar
GMATGuruNY
Joined: 04 Aug 2010
Last visit: 18 Nov 2025
Posts: 1,344
Own Kudos:
3,795
 [4]
Given Kudos: 9
Schools:Dartmouth College
Expert
Expert reply
Posts: 1,344
Kudos: 3,795
 [4]
3
Kudos
Add Kudos
1
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
edwin.que
If Machine X, working alone at its constant rate, performs half of a certain task and then Machine Y, working alone at its constant rate, performs the rest of the task, the whole task will take a total of 16 hours. How many hours will it take machine X, working alone at its constant rate, to perform the task?

(1) Working together at their respective constant rates, machines X and Y perform the task in 6 hours.

(2) Machine X has a faster rate than machine Y.

Statement 2 is clearly INSUFFICIENT.

Let x = X's rate alone and y = Y's rate alone, implying that the combined rate when X and Y work together = x+y

Statement 1:
Case 1: task = 48 units
Working together at their respective constant rates, machines X and Y perform the task in 6 hours.
Combined rate for X and Y to complete the 48-unit task in 6 hours = \(\frac{work}{time} = \frac{48}{6} = 8\) units per hour, implying that \(x+y = 8\)

If Machine X, working alone at its constant rate, performs half of a certain task and then Machine Y, working alone at its constant rate, performs the rest of the task, the whole task will take a total of 16 hours
Time for X to produce half the 48-unit task at rate of x units per hour \(= \frac{24}{x}\)
Time for Y to produce half the 48-unit task at a rate of y units per hour \(= \frac{24}{y}\)
Since the total time is 16 hours, we get:
\(\frac{24}{x} + \frac{24}{y} = 16\)

Since \(\frac{24}{x} + \frac{24}{y} = 16\) and \(x+y=8\), look for two factors of 24 that sum to 8:
2 and 6
4 and 4
Only the first combination satisfies \(\frac{24}{x} + \frac{24}{y} = 16\):
\(\frac{24}{2 }+ \frac{24}{6 }= 12 + 4 = 16\)

If x=2 and y=6. then the time for X to complete the 48-unit job \(= \frac{work}{rate} = \frac{48}{2} = 24\) hours
If x=6 and y=2. then the time for X to complete the 48-unit job \(= \frac{work}{rate} = \frac{48}{6} = 8\) hours
Since the time for X can be different values, INSUFFICIENT.

Statements combined:
In Case 1, attributing the faster rate to X implies that x=6, with the result that X's time = 8 hours

Case 2: task = 96 units
Working together at their respective constant rates, machines X and Y perform the task in 6 hours.
Combined rate for X and Y to complete the 96-unit task in 6 hours = \(\frac{work}{time} = \frac{96}{6} = 16\) units per hour, implying that \(x+y = 16\)

If Machine X, working alone at its constant rate, performs half of a certain task and then Machine Y, working alone at its constant rate, performs the rest of the task, the whole task will take a total of 16 hours
Time for X to produce half the 96-unit task at rate of x units per hour \(= \frac{48}{x}\)
Time for Y to produce half the 96-unit task ar a rate of y units per hour \(= \frac{48}{y}\)
Since the total time is 16 hours, we get:
\(\frac{48}{x} + \frac{48}{y} = 16\)

Since \(\frac{48}{x} + \frac{48}{y} = 16\) and \(x+y=16\), look for two factors of 48 that sum to 16:
4 and 12
8 and 8
Only the first combination satisfies \(\frac{48}{x} + \frac{48}{y} = 16\):
\(\frac{48}{4}+ \frac{48}{12}= 12 + 4 = 16\)

Attributing the faster rate to X implies that x=12, with the result that X's time to complete the 96-unit job \(= \frac{work}{rate} = \frac{96}{12 }= 8\) hours

In each case, X's time is the same: 8 hours
Thus, the two statements combined are SUFFICIENT.

User avatar
Dreamer24
Joined: 05 Mar 2017
Last visit: 16 Nov 2025
Posts: 8
Own Kudos:
7
 [2]
Given Kudos: 315
Location: India
Concentration: General Management, Strategy
GPA: 4
Posts: 8
Kudos: 7
 [2]
2
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
­Assume there is a total 48u of work that need to be completed.
Machine X did 24u and Machine Y did 24u in a total of 16hrs

Statement1:
They took 6 hours to complete the 48u of work. So in 1 hr, they are doing 8u.
If Machine X did 'a' unit of work then Y did '8-a' in 1hr
So we can form the equation now:

24/a +24/8-a =16
Solving this we will get a=2,6

We don't know if Machine X is doing 2 or 6 unit of work in 1 hr


Statement 2:
Clearly Insufficient

Statement 1+2:
machine X rate > Y's rate
So Machine X is doing 6u of work and Y is doing 2u 

Answer: C
 
User avatar
kkannan2
Joined: 20 Feb 2022
Last visit: 12 Aug 2024
Posts: 28
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 10
Location: United States
Posts: 28
Kudos: 9
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Hi GMATGuruNY, how are you just plugging in 48 and 96 units for the values of the total amount of work done by the machines? We don't know enough in this problem to infer a number for the number of units of work completed by the machines. If I were to solve this problem, I wouldn't feel confident plugging in values, especially given that this is a DS problem. Can you explain what is driving that intuition here to just pick two cases for 48 and 96 units and conclude that that is sufficient?

Also, can someone please present a solution for this problem with variables instead of choosing numbers? That would feel much more thorough. I am struggling to understand this one. Devvrata-your solution looks good, but u is still taken as an unknown (you haven't defined u as a specific value; u=1 or 2 or 3, etc.), so I don't understand how you arrived at sufficiency with the statements combined. From my interpretation of your solution, u could be anything. If you could elaborate on your approach, that would be helpful. Thanks in advance!­
User avatar
GMATGuruNY
Joined: 04 Aug 2010
Last visit: 18 Nov 2025
Posts: 1,344
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 9
Schools:Dartmouth College
Expert
Expert reply
Posts: 1,344
Kudos: 3,795
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
 
kkannan2
Hi GMATGuruNY, how are you just plugging in 48 and 96 units for the values of the total amount of work done by the machines? We don't know enough in this problem to infer a number for the number of units of work completed by the machines. If I were to solve this problem, I wouldn't feel confident plugging in values, especially given that this is a DS problem. Can you explain what is driving that intuition here to just pick two cases for 48 and 96 units and conclude that that is sufficient?





 
Here, the question stem asks for a value: the number of hours it takes X to perform the task alone.
If we test two different options for the task and get a certain number of hours for X in the first case but a different number of hours for X in the second case, then we have insufficient information to determine the number of hours for X.
But if the time for X in both cases is the SAME, the implication is that the size of the task is irrelevant: the number of hours for X will remain constant, whether the task is 48 units, 96 units, or 48000 units.

When implementing this approach, we should aim to test values that make the math easy.
For a work/rate problem, it is generally wise to select values divisible by the given rates and/or times.
Here, we are given two times -- 16 hours in the prompt, 6 hours in Statement 1 -- so I first tested a task of 48 units (the LCM of 16 and 6) and then a task of 96 units (the next greatest multiple of 16 and 6).




 ­
User avatar
kkannan2
Joined: 20 Feb 2022
Last visit: 12 Aug 2024
Posts: 28
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 10
Location: United States
Posts: 28
Kudos: 9
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
­Thank you Bunuel for the explanation, it makes more sense now. @GMATGuruNY-makes sense on your approach too with getting two different values for X and concluding it's insufficient, I guess I'm just a bit hesitant to plug in numbers for value-based DS questions in general, and am still not understanding how I'd arrive at sufficiency with your approach when combining the statements together. Regardless, I think Bunuel's explanation cleared up my doubts, thanks!
User avatar
GMATGuruNY
Joined: 04 Aug 2010
Last visit: 18 Nov 2025
Posts: 1,344
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 9
Schools:Dartmouth College
Expert
Expert reply
Posts: 1,344
Kudos: 3,795
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
 
kkannan2
@GMATGuruNY-still not understanding how I'd arrive at sufficiency with your approach when combining the statements together.
­The logic behind the testing-cases approach is as follows:
When the statements are combined, the time for X alone is 8 hours, no matter what value we assign to the task.

In my earlier post, Case 1 (task=48) and Case 2 (task=96) both yielded a time of 8 hours for X alone.

Case 3: task = 240 units

Again, let x = the rate for X and y = the rate for Y, implying that their combined rate = x+y.

Working together at their respective constant rates, machines X and Y perform the task in 6 hours.
Combined rate for X and Y to complete the 240-unit task in 6 hours = \(\frac{work}{time} = \frac{240}{6} = 40\) units per hour, implying that \(x+y = 40\).

If Machine X, working alone at its constant rate, performs half of a certain task and then Machine Y, working alone at its constant rate, performs the rest of the task, the whole task will take a total of 16 hours.
Time for X to produce half the 240-unit task at rate of x units per hour \(= \frac{120}{x}\)
Time for Y to produce half the 240-unit task at a rate of y units per hour \(= \frac{120}{y}\)
Since the total time is 16 hours, we get:
\(\frac{120}{x} + \frac{120}{y} = 16\)

Since \(\frac{120}{x} + \frac{120}{y} = 16\) and \(x+y=40\), look for two factors of 120 that sum to 40:
10 and 30
This combination satisfies both of the equations above.
Since X has the faster rate, x=30 and y=10.
At a rate of 30 units per hour, the time for X alone to complete the entire 240-unit task = \(\frac{work}{rate} = \frac{240}{30} = 8\) hours.

When the statements are combined, the time for X alone is 8 hours, no matter value is assigned to the task.
If the task = 48, X's time alone is 8 hours.
If the task = 96, X's time alone is 8 hours.
If the task = 240, X's time alone is 8 hours.
Since the time is THE SAME in every case, the two statements combined are SUFFICIENT.
Regardless of the size of the task, X's time alone will be 8 hours.


 ­
User avatar
Venu01298
Joined: 17 Sep 2024
Last visit: 11 Apr 2025
Posts: 30
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 9
Location: India
GMAT Focus 1: 695 Q86 V84 DI82
GPA: NA
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Think might have found an easier solution

Q - rephrased

Assume, T is the portion of work completed by machine X and Y separately when they work one after the other. Machine X's rate is x, Y's rate is y

T/x + T/y = 16 (Question)

(Tx + Ty) / (xy) = 16

T(x+y)/xy = 16


Statement 1 - Both machines working together complete it in 6 hours

Total work = T + T = 2T (from above)

2T / (x+y) = 6
T = 3(x+y)

Plugging T = 3(x+y) in above equation from Q

3(x+y)(x+y) / (xy) = 16

3(x+y)^2 / (xy) = 16

(x+y)^2 / (xy) = 16/3

only values that satisfy are 3 and 1. However, this is still not sufficient as we don't know which is which (x could be 3 or 1)

Statement 1 = Not sufficient


Statement 2 - Machine X is faster

This information alone is clearly not sufficient

Statement 2 = Not sufficient

Combining Statement 1 and 2,

x = 3 and y =1. Both statements together are sufficient
User avatar
mbaprepavi
Joined: 20 Jul 2024
Last visit: 18 Apr 2025
Posts: 35
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 108
Location: India
Posts: 35
Kudos: 30
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Let the time taken by MX be x and MY be y
Clearly, both statements individually are insufficient

We are given that x/2 + y/2 = 16 in the question
Which means x+y = 32 - (a)


Using both statements
1. 1/x+1/y = 1/6

Which gives us xy = 192

We also know "rate" of x is > "rate" of y
Which means time taken by x is less than time taken by y
Therefore we establish that x < y

Now, here comes the observation (Which can help and save time, instead of making a quadratic etc)
192 = 2^6 * 3

Possible products
64*3
32*6
12*16
24*8 - Voila => This sums up to 32 hours, and is the only valid solution


Therefore, C and not E
Great question

Cheers.
User avatar
Mannish
Joined: 11 Sep 2022
Last visit: 17 May 2025
Posts: 4
Given Kudos: 40
Posts: 4
Kudos: 0
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Here is a solution without solving the quadratic.

Simplifying the question stem:

1/(2X) + 1/(2Y) = 16
Do not stop, simplify even more, as said by our dearest GMATNinja
1/X + 1/Y = 32 ---- (I)

We need to find 1/X

Simplifying Statement 1:
1/(X+Y) = 6 ------- (II)

It is quite evident that putting (I) and (II) and solving quadratic, we will get the values of X and thus 1/X. But we DO NOT want to solve quadratic and without solving quadratic we will not know if we get only ONE positive value of X or TWO. Many of us will get trapped by our minds and mark A and move on.

Here is the smart way of looking at both the equations (I) & (II) above.
When I look at equation (II), I know the value of X+Y which is 1/6. When I look at equation (I), it looks that I can substitute X+Y into equation (I), it look like

(X+Y)/XY = 32
1/XY = 32*6 - this looks to a bit easy to find X and X without solving. Do not forget our dearest and simplify (do not take the meaning for the word seriously :P) more

1/XY = 32*6 = 8*4*6 = 8*24
(1/X)*(1/Y) = 8*24

1/X = 8 or 24; 1/Y = 24 or 8 ----- INSUFFICIENT

Statement 2: Alone it is non-sense.

Statement 1 + 2: Bingo!
User avatar
Aboyhasnoname
Joined: 19 Jan 2025
Last visit: 18 Nov 2025
Posts: 220
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 57
Products:
Posts: 220
Kudos: 84
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Time taken by X = x hours, so half job done in x/2 hours
Time taken by Y = y hours, so half job done in y/2 hours
Now, x/2 + y/2 = 16.... x+y = 32

Statement 1.
1/x + 1/y = 1/6

Means?......xy/x+y = 6
Now x + y = 32 So, xy/32 = 6
xy = 196...

Now, we'll try substituting y, by (32 - x)..... so x(32-x) = 196

32x - x^2= 196
or
x^2 - 32x + 196 = 0

Solving Quadratic, 24 and 8 ..The Values of X..So.... NS..There are 2 values

Statement 2 alone, is NS

Combine them. ....Out of 24 and 8, we know it will be 8 Since X is faster.


Combined. C Answer.





edwin.que
If Machine X, working alone at its constant rate, performs half of a certain task and then Machine Y, working alone at its constant rate, performs the rest of the task, the whole task will take a total of 16 hours. How many hours will it take machine X, working alone at its constant rate, to perform the task?

(1) Working together at their respective constant rates, machines X and Y perform the task in 6 hours.

(2) Machine X has a faster rate than machine Y.

A. Statement (1) ALONE is sufficient, but statement (2) alone is not sufficient.
B. Statement (2) ALONE is sufficient, but statement (1) alone is not sufficient.
C. Both statement TOGETHER are sufficient, but NEITHER statement ALONE is sufficient.
D. EACH statement ALONE is sufficient.
E. Statements (1) and (2) TOGETHER are NOT sufficient.
User avatar
mimundertaker
Joined: 10 Jun 2025
Last visit: 18 Nov 2025
Posts: 14
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 60
Location: India
Posts: 14
Kudos: 7
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Yes, this is how I tried solving - thanks for putting this solution, big ups!
Venu01298
Think might have found an easier solution

Q - rephrased

Assume, T is the portion of work completed by machine X and Y separately when they work one after the other. Machine X's rate is x, Y's rate is y

T/x + T/y = 16 (Question)

(Tx + Ty) / (xy) = 16

T(x+y)/xy = 16


Statement 1 - Both machines working together complete it in 6 hours

Total work = T + T = 2T (from above)

2T / (x+y) = 6
T = 3(x+y)

Plugging T = 3(x+y) in above equation from Q

3(x+y)(x+y) / (xy) = 16

3(x+y)^2 / (xy) = 16

(x+y)^2 / (xy) = 16/3

only values that satisfy are 3 and 1. However, this is still not sufficient as we don't know which is which (x could be 3 or 1)

Statement 1 = Not sufficient


Statement 2 - Machine X is faster

This information alone is clearly not sufficient

Statement 2 = Not sufficient

Combining Statement 1 and 2,

x = 3 and y =1. Both statements together are sufficient
User avatar
dhruvie
Joined: 07 Sep 2025
Last visit: 01 Nov 2025
Posts: 18
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 33
Products:
Posts: 18
Kudos: 2
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Here's how I approached this; a little less complicated than other solutions IMO:

Machines
Time
Efficiency
Machine Xa hrsb units/hr
Machine Yb hrsa units/hr

Explanation for the above table:

Assume a hrs and b hrs are the times taken by the machines. LCM of a and b is ab, which we assume as the total work. Therefore, the efficiency of Machine X is \(\frac{Total Work}{Work Per Hour Of X}\), which is \(\frac{ab}{a}\), i.e. b units/ hr. Same for Machine Y.

Back to the question:

Equation 1: Individual work


If X is doing half the work, then so is Y for the 16 hour time frame. That means both doing half work takes 16 hours.

Therefore time taken by both to complete the full work is 32 hours (16*2).

Time of X + Time of Y = 32, i.e., a + b = 32

Equation 2: Work done together


Total work is ab. And combined efficiency is (a+b). Hence, as per the question, \(\frac{ab}{(a+b)}=6 hrs\)

We already know a + b = 32, hence ab = 32*6 (No need to calculate it).


Finding the answer:

Solving both equations, we get the following two answers: 24 and 8. But we don't know which is which.

Statement II completes that gap.


Hence, the answer is C.


Why I didn't calculate a*b: 32*6 can be written as 8*4*6, which is 8*24 and 8+24=32 too, so why should you complicate things for yourself?

edwin.que
If Machine X, working alone at its constant rate, performs half of a certain task and then Machine Y, working alone at its constant rate, performs the rest of the task, the whole task will take a total of 16 hours. How many hours will it take machine X, working alone at its constant rate, to perform the task?

(1) Working together at their respective constant rates, machines X and Y perform the task in 6 hours.

(2) Machine X has a faster rate than machine Y.

A. Statement (1) ALONE is sufficient, but statement (2) alone is not sufficient.
B. Statement (2) ALONE is sufficient, but statement (1) alone is not sufficient.
C. Both statement TOGETHER are sufficient, but NEITHER statement ALONE is sufficient.
D. EACH statement ALONE is sufficient.
E. Statements (1) and (2) TOGETHER are NOT sufficient.
Moderators:
Math Expert
105355 posts
496 posts