Last visit was: 18 Nov 2025, 18:30 It is currently 18 Nov 2025, 18:30
Close
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Close
Request Expert Reply
Confirm Cancel
User avatar
GMATCoachBen
Joined: 21 Mar 2017
Last visit: 18 Nov 2025
Posts: 465
Own Kudos:
2,719
 [91]
Given Kudos: 210
Status:Professional GMAT Trainer
Affiliations: GMAT Coach
Location: United States (WA)
GMAT Focus 1: 775 Q87 V90 DI88 (Online)
GMAT 1: 760 Q50 V44
GMAT 2: 770 Q51 V44
GMAT 3: 770 Q50 V44
GMAT 4: 770 Q50 V45 (Online)
GMAT 5: 780 Q51 V48
Expert
Expert reply
GMAT Focus 1: 775 Q87 V90 DI88 (Online)
GMAT 5: 780 Q51 V48
Posts: 465
Kudos: 2,719
 [91]
11
Kudos
Add Kudos
80
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Most Helpful Reply
avatar
MT1302
Joined: 10 Jan 2023
Last visit: 05 Dec 2024
Posts: 95
Own Kudos:
719
 [15]
Given Kudos: 36
Location: India
Posts: 95
Kudos: 719
 [15]
10
Kudos
Add Kudos
5
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
Rebaz
Joined: 14 Feb 2014
Last visit: 31 Oct 2025
Posts: 143
Own Kudos:
35
 [9]
Given Kudos: 4,773
Posts: 143
Kudos: 35
 [9]
9
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
General Discussion
User avatar
GMATCoachBen
Joined: 21 Mar 2017
Last visit: 18 Nov 2025
Posts: 465
Own Kudos:
2,719
 [8]
Given Kudos: 210
Status:Professional GMAT Trainer
Affiliations: GMAT Coach
Location: United States (WA)
GMAT Focus 1: 775 Q87 V90 DI88 (Online)
GMAT 1: 760 Q50 V44
GMAT 2: 770 Q51 V44
GMAT 3: 770 Q50 V44
GMAT 4: 770 Q50 V45 (Online)
GMAT 5: 780 Q51 V48
Expert
Expert reply
GMAT Focus 1: 775 Q87 V90 DI88 (Online)
GMAT 5: 780 Q51 V48
Posts: 465
Kudos: 2,719
 [8]
7
Kudos
Add Kudos
1
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Video solution here:





 ­
User avatar
ShilpiAgnihotrii
Joined: 27 Dec 2022
Last visit: 18 Nov 2025
Posts: 84
Own Kudos:
68
 [2]
Given Kudos: 359
Location: India
Schools: ESSEC Kellogg IIM
Schools: ESSEC Kellogg IIM
Posts: 84
Kudos: 68
 [2]
2
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
 
Rebaz
I didnot know that higher proportion of chicory meant lower proportion of coffee=lower costs.

Maybe this has to do with my knowledge about coffee and i thought this is a DS question, so a iam not allowed to make assumptions.

Apparently it is common knowledge that higher proportion of chicory means lower proportion of coffee, which translates to lower costs. In this case then indeed the correct answer is C
­Hey Rebaz, its given in the question statement "greater the proportion of coffee, the more expensive the blend" so it obviously means that higher the chicory lower the cost because the blend has only Coffee + chicory. No assumptions required. 

 
User avatar
CWC
Joined: 03 Dec 2023
Last visit: 25 Aug 2024
Posts: 5
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 158
Posts: 5
Kudos: 21
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
ShilpiAgnihotrii

Rebaz
I didnot know that higher proportion of chicory meant lower proportion of coffee=lower costs.

Maybe this has to do with my knowledge about coffee and i thought this is a DS question, so a iam not allowed to make assumptions.

Apparently it is common knowledge that higher proportion of chicory means lower proportion of coffee, which translates to lower costs. In this case then indeed the correct answer is C
­Hey Rebaz, its given in the question statement "greater the proportion of coffee, the more expensive the blend" so it obviously means that higher the chicory lower the cost because the blend has only Coffee + chicory. No assumptions required. 


 
­It also helped me to think about it outside of coffee... for instance, imagine if the problem was talking about red-white piant blends to make pink paint and it told you that red paint cost more than white. You would be able to infer (without assumption) that the the more of a red hue the pink had, the more that paint would cost to make. Hope this helps. I konw it is frustrating when a question seems difficult due to the conceptual workding and not the "math of it"
User avatar
egmat
User avatar
e-GMAT Representative
Joined: 02 Nov 2011
Last visit: 18 Nov 2025
Posts: 5,108
Own Kudos:
32,883
 [5]
Given Kudos: 700
GMAT Date: 08-19-2020
Expert
Expert reply
Active GMAT Club Expert! Tag them with @ followed by their username for a faster response.
Posts: 5,108
Kudos: 32,883
 [5]
5
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
­Here is a detailed video solution for this interesting question.
See how this question can be solved in the test environment using "Owning the Dataset" approach.



Let us know if you have any questions.­
User avatar
Gemmie
Joined: 19 Dec 2021
Last visit: 18 Nov 2025
Posts: 491
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 76
Location: Viet Nam
Concentration: Technology, Economics
GMAT Focus 1: 695 Q87 V84 DI83
GPA: 3.55
GMAT Focus 1: 695 Q87 V84 DI83
Posts: 491
Kudos: 426
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Statement (1):

Blend L has a higher proportion of coffee than the other blends except for Blend M.

In terms of proportion of coffee, M > L

==> In terms of price, M > L
==> Do not know about the 3rd position (can be K, N, J)
==> NOT sufficient


Statement (2):

Blend K and Blend N both have a stronger flavor than Blend J.

Since the greater the proportion of chicory, the stronger the flavor, we can infer:

==> Blend J has a lower proportion of chicory than both Blend K and Blend N.
==> Blend J has a higher proportion of coffee​​​​​​ than both Blend K and Blend N
==> In terms of price, J > both K & N.
==> J can be 1st, 2nd or 3rd position
==> NOT sufficient


Combining Statements (1) and (2): J is the 3rd most expensive
==> Sufficient

 ­
User avatar
GMATBusters
User avatar
GMAT Tutor
Joined: 27 Oct 2017
Last visit: 14 Nov 2025
Posts: 1,924
Own Kudos:
6,646
 [2]
Given Kudos: 241
WE:General Management (Education)
Expert
Expert reply
Posts: 1,924
Kudos: 6,646
 [2]
2
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Rebaz
I didnot know that higher proportion of chicory meant lower proportion of coffee=lower costs.

Maybe this has to do with my knowledge about coffee and i thought this is a DS question, so a iam not allowed to make assumptions.

Apparently it is common knowledge that higher proportion of chicory means lower proportion of coffee, which translates to lower costs. In this case then indeed the correct answer is C
There is no need to know about coffee to say " higher proportion of chicory meant a lower proportion of coffee"

Whenever we have a mixture of 2 components, a higher proportion of one means a lower composition of other.

let's the mixture is composed of x and y

proportion of x in the mixture = x/(x+y)

proportion of y in the mixture = y/(x+y)

if x> y , proportion of x is more which is same as proportion of y is less and vice versa
User avatar
goaltop30mba
Joined: 04 Dec 2015
Last visit: 18 Oct 2025
Posts: 188
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 407
Posts: 188
Kudos: 68
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
From the question stem, we have below information:


Each of the 5 blends is a combination of Coffee and Chicory. So, what does that mean? It means that some Coffee to Chicory ratio exists, in terms of weight, in each of the 5 blends.


Coffee proportion = k1 * price of the blend


Chicory proportion = k2 * strength of flavor


Now, pause for a moment, and think whether there is something we can infer from all the information given to us in the question stem.

Notice: Greater the strength of flavor, greater the proportion of Chicory in a blend - Greater the proportion of Chicory in a blend, lesser the proportion of Coffee in a blend - Lesser the proportion of coffee in a blend, lesser the price of a blend. So, clearly, there is an inverse logical relationship between the Coffee proportion and strength of flavor and direct logical relationship between Coffee proportion and price.


So, we have "Coffee proportion = K * (1/strength of flavor) * (price)"


OR


Coffee proportion = K * (price/strength of flavor)


Statement 1:


So, we have, as per this statement.


_ < _ <_ < L< M


Notice that we don't have any information on J, K, and N - either of the 3 can be in the middle at the 3rd spot. Hence, statement 1 is not sufficient.


Statement 2:


From the combined logical relationship we have inferred from the question stem, which is "Coffee proportion = K * (price/strength of flavor)", we can clearly see that J is greater in terms of price than both K and N because it is the least in terms of strength of flavor out of J, K and N, which means least Chicory proportion, which means most Coffee proportion out of J, K, and N, which means "most" price when compared to both K and N.


So, one possibility is this: K < N < J < L < M


Another possibility is this : M < L < K < N < J


So, we have one possibility where J is the middle term, and we have another possibility where J is not the middle term or K is the middle term. Also, there are multiple other arrangements possible. Hence, statement 2 is not sufficient as well.


Now, what do we finally have from question stem, statement 1, and statement 2?


"K < N < J < L < M" OR "K < N < J < L < M"


Either way, J will always be the middle term as per all the information we have from question stem, statement 1, and statement 2.


Final answer: C
Moderators:
Math Expert
105355 posts
496 posts