Events & Promotions
|
|
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.
Customized
for You
Track
Your Progress
Practice
Pays
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Nov 1912:30 PM EST
-01:30 PM EST
Learn how Keshav, a Chartered Accountant, scored an impressive 705 on GMAT in just 30 days with GMATWhiz's expert guidance. In this video, he shares preparation tips and strategies that worked for him, including the mock, time management, and more
Nov 2001:30 PM EST
-02:30 PM IST
Learn how Kamakshi achieved a GMAT 675 with an impressive 96th %ile in Data Insights. Discover the unique methods and exam strategies that helped her excel in DI along with other sections for a balanced and high score.
Nov 2211:00 AM IST
-01:00 PM IST
Do RC/MSR passages scare you? e-GMAT is conducting a masterclass to help you learn – Learn effective reading strategies Tackle difficult RC & MSR with confidence Excel in timed test environment- Nov 23
11:00 AM IST
-01:00 PM IST
Attend this free GMAT Algebra Webinar and learn how to master the most challenging Inequalities and Absolute Value problems with ease. 
Nov 2407:00 PM PST
-08:00 PM PST
Full-length FE mock with insightful analytics, weakness diagnosis, and video explanations!
Nov 2510:00 AM EST
-11:00 AM EST
Prefer video-based learning? The Target Test Prep OnDemand course is a one-of-a-kind video masterclass featuring 400 hours of lecture-style teaching by Scott Woodbury-Stewart, founder of Target Test Prep and one of the most accomplished GMAT instructors.
Updated on: 31 Mar 2025, 01:39
Originally posted by purplelemonsoda on 02 Sep 2024, 06:24.
Last edited by Bunuel on 31 Mar 2025, 01:39, edited 7 times in total.
Last edited by Bunuel on 31 Mar 2025, 01:39, edited 7 times in total.
Kudos
Bookmarks
City X needs to increase its population of residents. Our new approach to promoting this goal is to offer incentives specifically targeted to individuals from population sectors in which migration to the city from the surrounding area has been greater than migration from the city to the surrounding area. To further this approach, we plan to provide the following incentives:
- increase the availability of resources for women entrepreneurs
- improve the city’s primary (elementary) schools
- improve services for citizens over 45 years of age
- improve services for low-income earners
- improve the city’s roads to facilitate quicker commutes
- increase the availability of resources for women entrepreneurs
- improve the city’s primary (elementary) schools
- improve services for citizens over 45 years of age
- improve services for low-income earners
- improve the city’s roads to facilitate quicker commutes
Migration to and from places outside of the respective city’s surrounding area
Be sure to select an answer first to save it in the Error Log before revealing the correct answer (OA)!
Difficulty:
25%
(medium)
Question Stats:
75% (03:00) correct
25%
(02:45)
wrong
based on 685
sessions
History
Date
Time
Result
Not Attempted Yet
Each of the following describes a possible contributor to the cities’ goals of population growth and diversity. Which of them is most clearly NOT addressed by either of the cities’ plans?
| Migration to and from the respective city’s surrounding area | |
| Migration to and from places outside of the respective city’s surrounding area | |
| Migration due to opportunities for continuing education | |
| Migration by families with children due to the relative quality of available schools | |
| Migration due to frustration with traffic congestion |
ShowHide Answer
Official Answer
Migration to and from places outside of the respective city’s surrounding area
City Schools: Yes
Residents’ ages: Yes
Income levels: No
Be sure to select an answer first to save it in the Error Log before revealing the correct answer (OA)!
Difficulty:
5%
(low)
Question Stats:
90% (00:48) correct
10%
(01:00)
wrong
based on 674
sessions
History
Date
Time
Result
Not Attempted Yet
For each of the following, select Yes if it describes an aspect to which BOTH the City X plan and City Y plan pay explicit attention. Otherwise, select No.
| Yes | No | |
| City Schools | ||
| Residents’ ages | ||
| Income levels |
ShowHide Answer
Official Answer
City Schools: Yes
Residents’ ages: Yes
Income levels: No
30-34 (age in years): No
Children aged 0-5 in same residence: Yes
Children aged 6-17 in same residence: Yes
Be sure to select an answer first to save it in the Error Log before revealing the correct answer (OA)!
Difficulty:
95%
(hard)
Question Stats:
42% (01:50) correct
58%
(01:48)
wrong
based on 870
sessions
History
Date
Time
Result
Not Attempted Yet
For each of the following factors listed in the Migration Patterns tab, select Yes if the data presented with respect to this factor clearly suggests that City Y’S incentives are appropriately targeted, given the city’s stated approach. Otherwise, select No.
| Yes | No | |
| 30-34 (age in years) | ||
| Children aged 0-5 in same residence | ||
| Children aged 6-17 in same residence |
ShowHide Answer
Official Answer
30-34 (age in years): No
Children aged 0-5 in same residence: Yes
Children aged 6-17 in same residence: Yes
Attachment:
2024-09-02_18-49-04.png [ 119.94 KiB | Viewed 10617 times ]
Attachment:
GMAT-Club-Forum-kw2qvmpy.png [ 74.7 KiB | Viewed 4141 times ]
Attachment:
GMAT-Club-Forum-5kq8jopr.png [ 153.53 KiB | Viewed 4132 times ]
Updated on: 23 Sep 2025, 00:13
Originally posted by Vedant_Wankhede on 03 Sep 2024, 11:57.
Last edited by Bunuel on 23 Sep 2025, 00:13, edited 1 time in total.
Last edited by Bunuel on 23 Sep 2025, 00:13, edited 1 time in total.
Kudos
Bookmarks
Question 3:
Question stem simplification :
For each factor we need to select Yes if the incentives of Y are specifically targeted or else No
How do we know if the incentives of Y are specifically targeted or not refer to Tab2 for this
City Y states the criteria that "incentives are specifically targeted to individuals from population sectors in which migration from the city to the surrounding area has been greater than migration to the city from the surrounding area."
Data in the migrations tab helps us this for each factor individually
30-34 (age in years) : We know (From Y %) is 5% and (to City Y %) is 15%, Hence the population migration from city Y(From Y %)to the surrounding has has been less than the population migration to the city Y (to City Y %) from surrounding
Hence for each factor to be specifcally targeted if (From Y %) > (to City Y %) select "Yes" else "No"
As it can be observed for the rest of the options
Children aged 0-5 in same residence
Children aged 6-17 in same residence
Question stem simplification :
For each factor we need to select Yes if the incentives of Y are specifically targeted or else No
How do we know if the incentives of Y are specifically targeted or not refer to Tab2 for this
City Y states the criteria that "incentives are specifically targeted to individuals from population sectors in which migration from the city to the surrounding area has been greater than migration to the city from the surrounding area."
Data in the migrations tab helps us this for each factor individually
30-34 (age in years) : We know (From Y %) is 5% and (to City Y %) is 15%, Hence the population migration from city Y(From Y %)to the surrounding has has been less than the population migration to the city Y (to City Y %) from surrounding
Hence for each factor to be specifcally targeted if (From Y %) > (to City Y %) select "Yes" else "No"
As it can be observed for the rest of the options
Children aged 0-5 in same residence
Children aged 6-17 in same residence
05 Sep 2024, 19:35
Kudos
Bookmarks
Q3:
The key criterion for selecting "Yes" is whether the percentage of people migrating from City Y (From Y %) is greater than the percentage of people migrating to City Y (To Y %). If the migration from City Y is higher than the migration to City Y, it means that City Y’s incentives are appropriately targeted, as they are designed to focus on population groups where more people are leaving than arriving, to help retain or attract them.
Let’s apply this criterion to each factor:
30-34 (age in years):
From City Y (%): 5%
To City Y (%): 15%
The percentage of people moving to City Y is higher than those moving away from it. Therefore, City Y’s policy is not specifically targeted at this group, since more people are moving in than out.
The answer should be “No.”
Children aged 0-5 in same residence
From City Y (%): 11%
To City Y (%): 3%
The percentage of people moving away from City Y (11%) is greater than the percentage of people moving in (3%). This means City Y has lost more families with children aged 0-5, so their incentives are appropriately targeted at this group.
The answer should be “Yes.”
Children aged 6-17 in same residence
From City Y (%): 9%
To City Y (%): 5%
The percentage of people moving away from City Y (9%) is greater than those moving in (5%), indicating that City Y’s policy is targeted at the right group since more people are leaving.
The answer should be “Yes.”
Final Answers:
30-34 age group: No
Children aged 0-5: Yes
Children aged 6-17: Yes
The key criterion for selecting "Yes" is whether the percentage of people migrating from City Y (From Y %) is greater than the percentage of people migrating to City Y (To Y %). If the migration from City Y is higher than the migration to City Y, it means that City Y’s incentives are appropriately targeted, as they are designed to focus on population groups where more people are leaving than arriving, to help retain or attract them.
Let’s apply this criterion to each factor:
30-34 (age in years):
From City Y (%): 5%
To City Y (%): 15%
The percentage of people moving to City Y is higher than those moving away from it. Therefore, City Y’s policy is not specifically targeted at this group, since more people are moving in than out.
The answer should be “No.”
Children aged 0-5 in same residence
From City Y (%): 11%
To City Y (%): 3%
The percentage of people moving away from City Y (11%) is greater than the percentage of people moving in (3%). This means City Y has lost more families with children aged 0-5, so their incentives are appropriately targeted at this group.
The answer should be “Yes.”
Children aged 6-17 in same residence
From City Y (%): 9%
To City Y (%): 5%
The percentage of people moving away from City Y (9%) is greater than those moving in (5%), indicating that City Y’s policy is targeted at the right group since more people are leaving.
The answer should be “Yes.”
Final Answers:
30-34 age group: No
Children aged 0-5: Yes
Children aged 6-17: Yes
