Find all School-related info fast with the new School-Specific MBA Forum

It is currently 23 May 2013, 21:39
Customize  |  Hide

ds#positive integer

  Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews  
Author Message
TAGS:
SVP
SVP
User avatar
Joined: 28 May 2005
Posts: 1741
Location: Dhaka
Followers: 5

Kudos [?]: 15 [0], given: 0

GMAT Tests User
ds#positive integer [#permalink] New post 30 Sep 2005, 11:14
00:00

Question Stats:

0% (00:00) correct 0% (00:00) wrong based on 0 sessions
OA to be followed....
Attachments

ds_positive integer.JPG
ds_positive integer.JPG [ 13.57 KiB | Viewed 188 times ]


_________________

hey ya......

VP
VP
User avatar
Joined: 22 Aug 2005
Posts: 1133
Location: CA
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 9 [0], given: 0

GMAT Tests User
 [#permalink] New post 30 Sep 2005, 12:08
C.
r = 0
here is partial explanation:

question stem:
(n-1) * (n+1) = r (mod 24) , 0 <= r < 24, or
n^2 - 1 = r (mod 24) or
24 / n^2 -1 -r where 0 <= r < 24

the only thing i remember is that any number of the form (n^2 - 1) is divisible by 24 if n is prime > 3.

(1) and (2) confirms that n is prime and is > 3

when 24/n^2-1, r will be 0

Last edited by duttsit on 30 Sep 2005, 13:30, edited 1 time in total.
Current Student
Joined: 28 Dec 2004
Posts: 3439
Location: New York City
Schools: Wharton'11 HBS'12
Followers: 11

Kudos [?]: 134 [0], given: 2

GMAT Tests User
 [#permalink] New post 30 Sep 2005, 12:10
Ok lets see....

if we have (n-1)n(n+1) well one of them is definetly a multiple of 3....

so (1) says 2 is not a factor of n...

well we know that [(n-1)(n)(n+1)]/24= 1/8 [(n-1)(n+1)] well we know then that (n-1)(n+1) both have at least three factors of 2....so the remainder r =0....

sufficient.

(11)
3 is not a factor of n...well then it means either N-1 or N+1 is a factor of 3...so we have n as a factor of 2...but we dont know anything about n+1 or n vice versa....so insufficient....we cant tell how many factors of 2 are there in n+1....

A it is...
VP
VP
Joined: 27 Dec 2004
Posts: 1089
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 5 [0], given: 0

GMAT Tests User
 [#permalink] New post 30 Sep 2005, 12:59
fresinha12 wrote:
Ok lets see....

if we have (n-1)n(n+1) well one of them is definetly a multiple of 3....

so (1) says 2 is not a factor of n...

well we know that [(n-1)(n)(n+1)]/24= 1/8 [(n-1)(n+1)] well we know then that (n-1)(n+1) both have at least three factors of 2....so the remainder r =0....

sufficient.

(11)
3 is not a factor of n...well then it means either N-1 or N+1 is a factor of 3...so we have n as a factor of 2...but we dont know anything about n+1 or n vice versa....so insufficient....we cant tell how many factors of 2 are there in n+1....

A it is...


Freshina12, the stem says (n+1) (n-1). thus C it is
SVP
SVP
User avatar
Joined: 28 May 2005
Posts: 1741
Location: Dhaka
Followers: 5

Kudos [?]: 15 [0], given: 0

GMAT Tests User
 [#permalink] New post 01 Oct 2005, 13:16
Can you guys explain it little more.....
_________________

hey ya......

Senior Manager
Senior Manager
User avatar
Joined: 30 Oct 2004
Posts: 290
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 3 [0], given: 0

GMAT Tests User
 [#permalink] New post 01 Oct 2005, 13:43
nakib77 wrote:
Can you guys explain it little more.....


I don't know if this is the easiest way to explain .. but from the stem..
For any number n>0 => (n-1)(n+1) has to be a factor of either 2 or 3 or both (plug some random values.. say n =59 => (58)(60) =>2,3,6 factors or say n=26 =>(25)(27) => 3 is a factor)

1) 2 is not a factor of n, out example of 59 shows r will be 0 but [edited: should consider something greater than 24] n=27, (26)(28) r is not zero. Insuff
2) 3 say n=26, (25)(27) divided by 24 will give some remainder r but this value again varies for every even value of n you consider. Insuff.

1&2 ... picking numbers is easy (since it cannot be a multiple of 2,3 or 6) ... say 49.. i.e. (48)(50) => r=0, or n=121 (120)(122) => r=0. So r=0 now for all values on n which is not a multiple of 2,3,6.

May not be the best explanation...But hope that helps.
_________________

-Vikram

Senior Manager
Senior Manager
User avatar
Joined: 30 Oct 2004
Posts: 290
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 3 [0], given: 0

GMAT Tests User
 [#permalink] New post 01 Oct 2005, 17:06
duttsit wrote:
the only thing i remember is that any number of the form (n^2 - 1) is divisible by 24 if n is prime > 3.


That's a real nice tip. Didn't know that.
_________________

-Vikram

Manager
Manager
User avatar
Joined: 03 Aug 2005
Posts: 137
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 2 [0], given: 0

 [#permalink] New post 03 Oct 2005, 05:00
Why is n = 1 excluded?

1 is a positive integer and 2 and 3 are not factors of 1.
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
User avatar
Joined: 15 Apr 2005
Posts: 425
Location: India, Chennai
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 1 [0], given: 0

GMAT Tests User
Re: ds#positive integer [#permalink] New post 04 Oct 2005, 03:15
nakib77 wrote:
OA to be followed....


My answer is A. The equn can be simplified as n^2 -1

From 1, 2 is not a factor of n. which mean n has to be odd.
If n = 3 then n ^2 -1 = 8 when divided by 24 gives the remanider 8.
If n = 5 then n ^ 2 - 1 = 24 gives the remainder 0.
If n = 7 then n ^ 2 - 1 = 48 gives the remainder 0.

So n should be 3.

From 2, 3 is not a factor of n. so either n or n+1 should be a factor of 2. This leaves us with more than one answer to choose. So B is not sufficient.

Hence my answer is A.
Re: ds#positive integer   [#permalink] 04 Oct 2005, 03:15
    Similar topics Author Replies Last post
Similar
Topics:
New posts Integer tzec76 2 07 Dec 2003, 05:50
New posts integers vikasgaba 5 10 Jan 2006, 10:25
New posts Integers nick_sun 2 22 Mar 2007, 01:49
New posts integer nick_sun 4 11 Jun 2007, 06:58
New posts Integers ventivish 1 16 May 2008, 13:19
Display posts from previous: Sort by

ds#positive integer

  Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews  


cron

GMAT Club MBA Forum Home| About| Privacy Policy| Terms and Conditions| GMAT Club Rules| Contact| Sitemap

Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group and phpBB SEO

Kindly note that the GMAT® test is a registered trademark of the Graduate Management Admission Council®, and this site has neither been reviewed nor endorsed by GMAC®.