| Author |
Message |
|
deepakdewani
|
Posted: Tue Feb 23, 2010 7:40 am |
|
Joined: Tue Dec 29, 2009 Posts: 42 Location: India
Concentration: Finance, Real Estate Schools: Duke (Fuqua) - Class of 2014 GMAT 1: 770 Q50 V44
GPA: 3.5 WE: General Management (Real Estate) Followers: 2
Kudos (?): 7 (0), given: 1
|
SudiptoGmat wrote: deepakdewani wrote: Please explain: How does angle ABC < 90 deg. lead to the conclusion "AB^2 + BC^2 > AC^2"? Quote: Its rule. Just memorise it. While I agree that eventually remebering this rule for GMAT will be the best bet, I am hoping that you can provide the underlying rationale/logic for this rule. Haven't quite come across this rule in the strategy guides...though i am sure this rule can be quite handy in geometry questions involving some variation of inequalities.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
nvgroshar
|
Posted: Tue Feb 23, 2010 8:30 am |
|
 |
| Intern |
 |
Joined: Sun Nov 15, 2009 Posts: 32 Location: Moscow, Russia Followers: 0
Kudos (?): 3 (0), given: 0
|
|
This rule is called cosine theorem: for any triangle ABC AC^2=AB^2+BC^2-2AB*BC*cos\angle ABC.
|
|
|
|
 |
|
Bunuel
|
Posted: Tue Feb 23, 2010 9:52 am |
|
Joined: Wed Sep 02, 2009 Posts: 7456 Followers: 854
Kudos (?): 4529 (0), given: 213
|
|
|
|
 |
|
themanwithaplan
|
Posted: Mon Mar 01, 2010 5:23 pm |
|
 |
| Intern |
 |
Joined: Tue Oct 06, 2009 Posts: 9 Followers: 0
Kudos (?): 11 (0), given: 0
|
|
hello everyone,
How does angle ABC < 90 deg. lead to the conclusion "AB^2 + BC^2 > AC^2"?
doesn't this appear to be an application of the third side rule of a + b > c but a - b < c so by looking at the graph u can tell how this info was deduced.
|
|
|
|
 |
|
Orange08
|
Posted: Sat Oct 16, 2010 2:07 pm |
|
 |
| Manager |
 |
Joined: Sun Jul 25, 2010 Posts: 157 Followers: 1
Kudos (?): 9 (0), given: 29
|
|
Bunuel, how is it deduced as isosceles triangle?
|
|
|
|
 |
|
MathMind
|
Posted: Thu Dec 02, 2010 12:00 pm |
|
 |
| Intern |
 |
Joined: Sat May 29, 2010 Posts: 2 Followers: 0
Kudos (?): 0 (0), given: 1
|
|
Bunuel,
Great explanation - I am not sure about your conclusion "Hence a>1 is not true as when we decrease angle ABC, a will decrease as well and will become less than 1"
I think this may lead to "As the angle ABC decreases, since ht=a^2 when base = 2a (ht/base ratio = a/2), the base will become broader => a will increase
=> This triangle will have area = 1 for ABC = 90*
=> This triangle will have area > 1 for ABC < 90*
=> This triangle will have area < 1 for ABC > 90* "
Thx, JS
|
|
|
|
 |
|
MathMind
|
Posted: Thu Dec 02, 2010 3:40 pm |
|
 |
| Intern |
 |
Joined: Sat May 29, 2010 Posts: 2 Followers: 0
Kudos (?): 0 (0), given: 1
|
ooops, and my typo 2a in place of 2/a, led to a/2 instead of a^3/2  thank you so much for responding, you are one of the most brilliant minds I've seen in the GMAT math domain and it's always a pleasure to view your problem solving strategies! JS.
|
|
|
|
 |
|
rongali
|
Posted: Fri Feb 25, 2011 8:13 am |
|
 |
| Manager |
 |
Joined: Fri Feb 11, 2011 Posts: 116 Followers: 1
Kudos (?): 0 (0), given: 0
|
|
good question...A is the answer...
|
|
|
|
 |
|
gmat1220
|
Posted: Fri Feb 25, 2011 10:30 am |
|
 |
| Director |
 |
Joined: Thu Feb 03, 2011 Posts: 954 Followers: 9
Kudos (?): 120 (0), given: 121
|
Bunuel Please confirm my understanding - cos(x) when x < 90 is positive and when x > 90 is negative. When x < 90 ab^2 + bc^2 - (something) = ac^2 or ab^2 + bc^2 = (something) + ac^2 Hence ab^2 + bc^2 > ac^2 When x > 90 ab^2 + bc^2 + (something) = ac^2 or ab^2 + bc^2 < ac^2 nvgroshar wrote: This rule is called cosine theorem: for any triangle ABC AC^2=AB^2+BC^2-2AB*BC*cos\angle ABC.
|
|
|
|
 |
|
rajeshaaidu
|
Posted: Sun Feb 27, 2011 10:58 pm |
|
 |
| Manager |
 |
Status: A continuous journey of self-improvement is essential for every person -Socrates Joined: Sun Jan 02, 2011 Posts: 79 Followers: 1
Kudos (?): 1 (0), given: 14
|
|
[quote="deepakdewani"][quote="SudiptoGmat"][quote="deepakdewani"]Please explain:
How does angle ABC < 90 deg. lead to the conclusion "AB^2 + BC^2 > AC^2"?
[quote]Its rule. Just memorise it. While I agree that eventually remebering this rule for GMAT will be the best bet, I am hoping that you can
I think, This can be explained by thinking like this, if ABC is 90 degree then AB^2 + BC^2 = AC^2. Now, since side of the triangle is proprtional to the angle opposite to the side- we know that angle ABC is less than 90, so the side opposite to that will be smaller than the hypotenues of the right angle triangle. By this, we can write that AB^2 + BC^2 > AC^2.
Hope it helps!!!
|
|
|
|
 |
|
bleemgame
|
Posted: Mon May 02, 2011 2:22 pm |
|
 |
| Intern |
 |
Joined: Mon Apr 11, 2011 Posts: 32 Location: London WE 1: 3 yrs f/t manager in aerospace (IT - Commercial - Int'l Mktg) WE 2: 5 yrs freelance consultant to Gov't Followers: 0
Kudos (?): 3 (0), given: 3
|
themanwithaplan wrote: hello everyone,
How does angle ABC < 90 deg. lead to the conclusion "AB^2 + BC^2 > AC^2"?
doesn't this appear to be an application of the third side rule of a + b > c but a - b < c so by looking at the graph u can tell how this info was deduced. (realise this is an old question, but for anyone wondering why....) setting ABC = 90 deg, you get a right angled isos triangle.... pythagoras theorem gives you a^2 + b^2 = c^2 (where c^2 = hypotenuse. and a and b are the other two sides) logically, if the angle is less than 90 degrees and the triangles is isosceles, side C *must* be smaller than a^2 + b^2.... here they've just used 'AB' and 'BC' to indicate sides 'a' and 'b' as they appear in the theorem, and AC would be the hypotenuse if the triangle was a right triangle
_________________ Blogging my way through the applications/study process!! http://mbahorizons.blogspot.com/
|
|
|
|
 |
|
gmat4fun
|
Posted: Mon Jun 06, 2011 8:33 am |
|
 |
| Intern |
 |
Joined: Wed May 12, 2010 Posts: 5 Location: india Schools: Virginia Darden,Duke Fuqua,Michigan Ross Followers: 0
Kudos (?): 0 (0), given: 0
|
|
Case 1: Consider angle ABC=90 , in that case BCA and BAC angles will equal 45 deg.
now applying tan BCA= tan 45 = BO/OC consider O as the origin.
which implies BO/OC = a^3 = 1 or a=1.
Now since its given that angle ABC is less than 90 deg that means angle BAC and BCA can only exceed the value of 45 deg.
And tan of any value in excess of 45 is always more than 1.
That means for angle ABC < 90 we have BO/OC=a^3 > 1 => a > 1 --- sufficient
Case 2: Permiter is > 4/a =>AB+BC+CA > 4/a x+x+ 2/a > 4/a => x > 1/a that is BC or BA > CA which is always the case (hypotnuse is alws greater) .Thsi option does nt tell u whther BCA and BAC angles are greater than 45 degree or not.Hence no way to find whther a > 1 or not. -----insuff
Hence ans-A
|
|
|
|
 |
|
shawndx
|
Posted: Tue Dec 20, 2011 11:33 am |
|
 |
| Intern |
 |
Joined: Thu Oct 13, 2011 Posts: 18 Followers: 0
Kudos (?): 0 (0), given: 16
|
|
can anyone explain how they deduced from the illustration that the triangle was an isosceles? The diagram doesn't indicate that AB and AC are equal, so why couldn't it be a 30-60-90 triangle and the illustration is not to scale? is it because from the origin the distance is 1/a both ways, deducing that from that point reaching a2 indicates that ab and bc must be equal?
|
|
|
|
 |
|
Yekrut
|
Posted: Wed Feb 29, 2012 2:49 pm |
|
 |
| Manager |
 |
Joined: Thu Feb 02, 2012 Posts: 205 Location: United States GPA: 3.08 Followers: 1
Kudos (?): 24 (0), given: 98
|
|
Tough question for me. Don't think I could do it in under 2 minutes.
|
|
|
|
 |
|
yatendragoel
|
Posted: Thu Mar 01, 2012 7:04 am |
|
 |
| Intern |
 |
Joined: Sun Jan 29, 2012 Posts: 2 Schools: Tuck Followers: 0
Kudos (?): 0 (0), given: 2
|
Simplest answer would be: Given that ABC is an equilateral triangle (will tell you why it is an equilateral triangle at the end) with side length of 2/a and altitude of length square(a), so the area will be \frac{1}{2}* \frac{2}{a}*square(a) = a so the question is whether a>1? And we cannot determine this with the information given in the question so let's look at the given 2 statements whether they provide any extra information: stmt1 is redundant information - we already know that all angles of an equilateral triangle are of 60 degree stmt2 is redundant information - length of one side is given (2/a), so perimeter will be (3 * \frac{2}{a}) = 6/a So both the statements are not providing any extra information so we cannot determine whether a>1? Why the given triangle is an equilateral triangle Triangle property: if altitude, median and perpendicular bisector of a triangle are same, then the triangle is an equilateral triangle. amitdgr wrote: On the picture below, is the area of the triangle ABC greater than 1? 1. \angle ABC < 90^\circ 2. Perimeter of the triangle ABC is greater than \frac{4}{a}
|
|
|
|
 |
|
Bunuel
|
Posted: Thu Mar 01, 2012 7:16 am |
|
Joined: Wed Sep 02, 2009 Posts: 7456 Followers: 854
Kudos (?): 4529 (0), given: 213
|
|
|
|
 |
|
gmatdreamer
|
Posted: Sat Mar 03, 2012 8:42 am |
|
 |
| Intern |
 |
Joined: Fri Apr 03, 2009 Posts: 12 Followers: 0
Kudos (?): 0 (0), given: 0
|
|
Tough one. Is there a way by which it can be solved easily
|
|
|
|
 |
|
Get Started:
Two Free Trial Tests
Get All GMATClub Tests


|