In 1979 lack of rain reduced India's rice production to : GMAT Sentence Correction (SC)
Check GMAT Club Decision Tracker for the Latest School Decision Releases http://gmatclub.com/AppTrack

 It is currently 16 Jan 2017, 22:17

### GMAT Club Daily Prep

#### Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

# Events & Promotions

###### Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

# In 1979 lack of rain reduced India's rice production to

Author Message
TAGS:

### Hide Tags

Manager
Joined: 11 Jul 2012
Posts: 53
Followers: 11

Kudos [?]: 804 [5] , given: 0

In 1979 lack of rain reduced India's rice production to [#permalink]

### Show Tags

08 Aug 2012, 12:43
5
KUDOS
52
This post was
BOOKMARKED
00:00

Difficulty:

15% (low)

Question Stats:

65% (01:40) correct 35% (00:44) wrong based on 3181 sessions

### HideShow timer Statistics

In 1979 lack of rain reduced India's rice production to about 41 million tons, nearly 25 percent less than those of the 1978 harvest.

(A) less than those of the 1978 harvest

(B) less than the 1978 harvest

(C) less than 1978

(D) fewer than 1978

(E) fewer than that of India's 1978 harvest
[Reveal] Spoiler: OA
If you have any questions
New!
Director
Status: Final Countdown
Joined: 17 Mar 2010
Posts: 563
Location: India
GPA: 3.82
WE: Account Management (Retail Banking)
Followers: 17

Kudos [?]: 278 [0], given: 75

Re: In 1979 lack of rain reduced India's rice production to [#permalink]

### Show Tags

08 Aug 2012, 20:26
"production"is non countable so "less than " should be used.
CDE Out
A Vs B
X less than Y
production less than harvest
_________________

" Make more efforts "
Press Kudos if you liked my post

Intern
Joined: 07 Aug 2012
Posts: 4
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 6 [0], given: 0

Re: In 1979 lack of rain reduced India's rice production to [#permalink]

### Show Tags

08 Aug 2012, 20:53
Can some one explain what's wrong with A
Intern
Joined: 29 May 2012
Posts: 11
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 2 [1] , given: 4

Re: In 1979 lack of rain reduced India's rice production to [#permalink]

### Show Tags

08 Aug 2012, 20:57
1
KUDOS
dabangg wrote:
Can some one explain what's wrong with A

A is wrong because those refers to tons . But we need to compare harvest total in one year to harvest total in another year.

Last edited by karthikguptav on 08 Aug 2012, 20:58, edited 1 time in total.
CEO
Status: Nothing comes easy: neither do I want.
Joined: 12 Oct 2009
Posts: 2795
Location: Malaysia
Concentration: Technology, Entrepreneurship
Schools: ISB '15 (M)
GMAT 1: 670 Q49 V31
GMAT 2: 710 Q50 V35
Followers: 226

Kudos [?]: 1619 [4] , given: 235

Re: In 1979 lack of rain reduced India's rice production to [#permalink]

### Show Tags

08 Aug 2012, 20:57
4
KUDOS
dabangg wrote:
Can some one explain what's wrong with A

In 1979 India's rice production was nearly 25 percent less than those of the 1978 harvest.

does it make any sense?

Rice production is singular so you can not use 'THOSE'
_________________

Fight for your dreams :For all those who fear from Verbal- lets give it a fight

Money Saved is the Money Earned

Jo Bole So Nihaal , Sat Shri Akaal

GMAT Club Premium Membership - big benefits and savings

Gmat test review :
http://gmatclub.com/forum/670-to-710-a-long-journey-without-destination-still-happy-141642.html

Manager
Joined: 02 Jun 2011
Posts: 114
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 43 [0], given: 5

Re: In 1979 lack of rain reduced India's rice production to [#permalink]

### Show Tags

08 Aug 2012, 21:43
betterscore wrote:
In 1979 lack of rain reduced India's rice production to about 41 million tons, nearly 25 percent less than those of the 1978 harvest.

(A) less than those of the 1978 harvest

(B) less than the 1978 harvest

(C) less than 1978

(D) fewer than 1978

(E) fewer than that of India's 1978 harvest

Less than in the start of phrase should be there so, D and E are out. however, after less than "that of" is required to make it parallel. "Those of" is wrong as it comes when noun is plural. "C' is also out.
But why "B" is right I dont know.

CEO
Status: Nothing comes easy: neither do I want.
Joined: 12 Oct 2009
Posts: 2795
Location: Malaysia
Concentration: Technology, Entrepreneurship
Schools: ISB '15 (M)
GMAT 1: 670 Q49 V31
GMAT 2: 710 Q50 V35
Followers: 226

Kudos [?]: 1619 [14] , given: 235

Re: In 1979 lack of rain reduced India's rice production to [#permalink]

### Show Tags

08 Aug 2012, 22:06
14
KUDOS
1
This post was
BOOKMARKED
jitgoel wrote:
betterscore wrote:
In 1979 lack of rain reduced India's rice production to about 41 million tons, nearly 25 percent less than those of the 1978 harvest.

(A) less than those of the 1978 harvest

(B) less than the 1978 harvest

(C) less than 1978

(D) fewer than 1978

(E) fewer than that of India's 1978 harvest

Less than in the start of phrase should be there so, D and E are out. however, after less than "that of" is required to make it parallel. "Those of" is wrong as it comes when noun is plural. "C' is also out.
But why "B" is right I dont know.

less than that of 1978 => right
less than that of 1978 harvest => wrong.

My weight is less than that of you => right
My weight is less than your weight => right ( similar to option 2)
My weight is less than that of your weight => wrong ? what is that of your weight?
you can not compare my weight with something which is " that of your weight".
_________________

Fight for your dreams :For all those who fear from Verbal- lets give it a fight

Money Saved is the Money Earned

Jo Bole So Nihaal , Sat Shri Akaal

GMAT Club Premium Membership - big benefits and savings

Gmat test review :
http://gmatclub.com/forum/670-to-710-a-long-journey-without-destination-still-happy-141642.html

Manager
Joined: 02 Jun 2011
Posts: 114
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 43 [0], given: 5

Re: In 1979 lack of rain reduced India's rice production to [#permalink]

### Show Tags

08 Aug 2012, 22:53
gurpreetsingh wrote:
jitgoel wrote:
betterscore wrote:
In 1979 lack of rain reduced India's rice production to about 41 million tons, nearly 25 percent less than those of the 1978 harvest.

(A) less than those of the 1978 harvest

(B) less than the 1978 harvest

(C) less than 1978

(D) fewer than 1978

(E) fewer than that of India's 1978 harvest

Less than in the start of phrase should be there so, D and E are out. however, after less than "that of" is required to make it parallel. "Those of" is wrong as it comes when noun is plural. "C' is also out.
But why "B" is right I dont know.

less than that of 1978 => right
less than that of 1978 harvest => wrong.

My weight is less than that of you => right
My weight is less than your weight => right ( similar to option 2)
My weight is less than that of your weight => wrong ? what is that of your weight?
you can not compare my weight with something which is " that of your weight".

But in 'B' we are comparing production with the harvest, which might not be correct. Production with production will be ok.
CEO
Status: Nothing comes easy: neither do I want.
Joined: 12 Oct 2009
Posts: 2795
Location: Malaysia
Concentration: Technology, Entrepreneurship
Schools: ISB '15 (M)
GMAT 1: 670 Q49 V31
GMAT 2: 710 Q50 V35
Followers: 226

Kudos [?]: 1619 [0], given: 235

Re: In 1979 lack of rain reduced India's rice production to [#permalink]

### Show Tags

08 Aug 2012, 23:39
jitgoel wrote:
But in 'B' we are comparing production with the harvest, which might not be correct. Production with production will be ok.

You don't need the attributes to be similar in terms of exact meaning. The attributes should be logically similar.

PS: production of crops is quite symbolic to harvest !!
_________________

Fight for your dreams :For all those who fear from Verbal- lets give it a fight

Money Saved is the Money Earned

Jo Bole So Nihaal , Sat Shri Akaal

GMAT Club Premium Membership - big benefits and savings

Gmat test review :
http://gmatclub.com/forum/670-to-710-a-long-journey-without-destination-still-happy-141642.html

Intern
Joined: 05 Apr 2012
Posts: 23
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 9 [0], given: 12

Re: In 1979 lack of rain reduced India's rice production to [#permalink]

### Show Tags

11 Aug 2012, 10:02
betterscore wrote:
In 1979 lack of rain reduced India's rice production to about 41 million tons, nearly 25 percent less than those of the 1978 harvest.

(A) less than those of the 1978 harvest

(B) less than the 1978 harvest

(C) less than 1978

(D) fewer than 1978

(E) fewer than that of India's 1978 harvest

It is B. 1979 rice production is compared with 1978 harvest. Hope it helps!
Manager
Status: Bunuel's fan!
Joined: 08 Jul 2011
Posts: 242
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 40 [0], given: 55

Re: In 1979 lack of rain reduced India's rice production to [#permalink]

### Show Tags

21 Dec 2012, 09:48
So if
(E) fewer than that of India's 1978 harvest

was changed to

(e) less than that of...

Will that be a correct choice?

Thanks
Manhattan GMAT Instructor
Joined: 22 Mar 2011
Posts: 945
Followers: 302

Kudos [?]: 823 [11] , given: 25

Re: In 1979 lack of rain reduced India's rice production to [#permalink]

### Show Tags

21 Dec 2012, 12:52
11
KUDOS
Expert's post
9
This post was
BOOKMARKED
We only want to use "that of" or "those of" if we are comparing something *belonging* to something else:

The design of the new tablet is similar to that of its predecessor. (The design of one is similar to the design of the other.)
Jack wanted clothes similar to those of his friends. (He wants his clothes to be similar to his friends' clothes.)

In the above examples, it would be a big problem to get rid of the relative pronoun:

The design of the new tablet is similar to its predecessor. (The design is similar to the predecessor?)
Jack wanted clothes similar to his friends. (He wants his clothes to be similar to his friends?)

In B, we are correctly comparing the production in 1979 to the harvest in 1978. If we go with gmatfighter12's proposed phrasing, "less than that of," we have to ask what "that" stands for. If we say "less than that of the 1978 harvest," then "that" doesn't seem to stand for anything. If we say "less than that of 1978," the antecedent for "that" isn't entirely clear, although "production" seems like the most reasonable choice. E would then be clearer than the other wrong answer choices, but still not as clear as B.

Note that in my examples, it was very clear what "that" and "those" stood for. If we don't know what our pronouns stand for, we should probably replace them. In general, a specific noun is preferable to a vague pronoun (unless that specific noun is clearly wrong!).
_________________

Dmitry Farber | Manhattan GMAT Instructor | New York

Manhattan GMAT Discount | Manhattan GMAT Course Reviews | View Instructor Profile |
Manhattan GMAT Reviews

VP
Joined: 08 Jun 2010
Posts: 1398
Followers: 3

Kudos [?]: 113 [0], given: 812

Re: In 1979 lack of rain reduced India's rice production to [#permalink]

### Show Tags

23 Dec 2012, 06:18
when the number is big, we use "less" not " fewer" , though the number is countable

is that right? I am not clear of this point.
Manhattan GMAT Instructor
Joined: 22 Mar 2011
Posts: 945
Followers: 302

Kudos [?]: 823 [7] , given: 25

Re: In 1979 lack of rain reduced India's rice production to [#permalink]

### Show Tags

23 Dec 2012, 10:53
7
KUDOS
Expert's post
7
This post was
BOOKMARKED
No, size makes no difference. We always use "fewer" for countable and "less" for uncountable. Here, we use "less" rather than "fewer" because we are comparing the overall size of production, rather than the specific number of tons. This generally happens with weights and measures. For instance, I would say "I weigh less than 200 pounds," not fewer, because I am talking about a measurement, not a group of things. I'd also say "I want less than 3 ounces of coffee" or "I have less than 5 feet of rope left." Sure, we can count pounds, ounces, and feet, but we are using them to talk about an amount, not a number. 3 ounces of coffee is a way of saying how much coffee you have, but we're not counting individual coffee beans. Similarly, in the original problem, we're not counting individual grains of rice; rather, we're measuring overall rice production.
_________________

Dmitry Farber | Manhattan GMAT Instructor | New York

Manhattan GMAT Discount | Manhattan GMAT Course Reviews | View Instructor Profile |
Manhattan GMAT Reviews

VP
Joined: 08 Jun 2010
Posts: 1398
Followers: 3

Kudos [?]: 113 [0], given: 812

Re: In 1979 lack of rain reduced India's rice production to [#permalink]

### Show Tags

29 Dec 2012, 23:11
"less" is used for non countable. "few" is used for countable

why "few" in D and E are wrong?
Current Student
Joined: 27 Jun 2012
Posts: 418
Concentration: Strategy, Finance
Followers: 77

Kudos [?]: 778 [1] , given: 184

Re: In 1979 lack of rain reduced India's rice production to [#permalink]

### Show Tags

29 Dec 2012, 23:43
1
KUDOS
thangvietnam, check above for the explanation given by Dmitry Farber from MGMAT. He has explained why use "Less" rather than "Fewer" to compare the measurements or weights.
_________________

Thanks,
Prashant Ponde

Tough 700+ Level RCs: Passage1 | Passage2 | Passage3 | Passage4 | Passage5 | Passage6 | Passage7
VOTE GMAT Practice Tests: Vote Here
PowerScore CR Bible - Official Guide 13 Questions Set Mapped: Click here

Manager
Joined: 13 Oct 2012
Posts: 78
Schools: IE '15 (A)
GMAT 1: 760 Q49 V46
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: -12 [0], given: 0

Re: In 1979 lack of rain reduced India's rice production to [#permalink]

### Show Tags

03 Jan 2013, 16:21
B is correct.
Rice production is correctly compared with harvest while the comparisons in other options are not correct
VP
Joined: 08 Jun 2010
Posts: 1398
Followers: 3

Kudos [?]: 113 [0], given: 812

Re: In 1979 lack of rain reduced India's rice production to [#permalink]

### Show Tags

15 Jan 2013, 03:01
DmitryFarber wrote:
No, size makes no difference. We always use "fewer" for countable and "less" for uncountable. Here, we use "less" rather than "fewer" because we are comparing the overall size of production, rather than the specific number of tons. This generally happens with weights and measures. For instance, I would say "I weigh less than 200 pounds," not fewer, because I am talking about a measurement, not a group of things. I'd also say "I want less than 3 ounces of coffee" or "I have less than 5 feet of rope left." Sure, we can count pounds, ounces, and feet, but we are using them to talk about an amount, not a number. 3 ounces of coffee is a way of saying how much coffee you have, but we're not counting individual coffee beans. Similarly, in the original problem, we're not counting individual grains of rice; rather, we're measuring overall rice production.

great, thank you, manhantan expert.

I am satisfied with oa but

In 1979 lack of rain reduced India's rice production to about 41 million tons, nearly 25 percent //less than those of the 1978 harvest.//

(A) less than those of the 1978 harvest

(B) less than the 1978 harvest

(C) less than 1978

(D) fewer than 1978

(E) fewer than that of India's 1978 harvest

but "less than the 1978 harvest" modify "production" or " 41 million tons" pls, help
Intern
Joined: 18 Jan 2013
Posts: 8
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 5 [0], given: 2

Re: In 1979 lack of rain reduced India's rice production to [#permalink]

### Show Tags

26 Jan 2013, 00:24
dabangg wrote:
Can some one explain what's wrong with A

Here those of is not clear.Where/what exactly it is pointing?. To the harvest?country?.
Remove the word and the sentence becomes clear
VP
Joined: 08 Jun 2010
Posts: 1398
Followers: 3

Kudos [?]: 113 [0], given: 812

Re: In 1979 lack of rain reduced India's rice production to [#permalink]

### Show Tags

01 Feb 2013, 02:52
DmitryFarber wrote:
No, size makes no difference. We always use "fewer" for countable and "less" for uncountable. Here, we use "less" rather than "fewer" because we are comparing the overall size of production, rather than the specific number of tons. This generally happens with weights and measures. For instance, I would say "I weigh less than 200 pounds," not fewer, because I am talking about a measurement, not a group of things. I'd also say "I want less than 3 ounces of coffee" or "I have less than 5 feet of rope left." Sure, we can count pounds, ounces, and feet, but we are using them to talk about an amount, not a number. 3 ounces of coffee is a way of saying how much coffee you have, but we're not counting individual coffee beans. Similarly, in the original problem, we're not counting individual grains of rice; rather, we're measuring overall rice production.

THANK YOU expert,
do you have any tips for "few " and "less" , pls help
Re: In 1979 lack of rain reduced India's rice production to   [#permalink] 01 Feb 2013, 02:52

Go to page    1   2   3    Next  [ 56 posts ]

Similar topics Replies Last post
Similar
Topics:
2 In 2002 lack of resources reduced the agricultural production of the 2 28 Nov 2015, 22:08
6 In 1979 lack of rain reduced India's rice production to 3 15 Aug 2014, 02:22
idiom - lack 0 08 Sep 2012, 10:59
To lack self-discipline is to lack any true commitment to 1 06 Oct 2010, 05:11
The herbicide Oryzalin was still being produced in 1979, 8 16 Apr 2007, 07:49
Display posts from previous: Sort by