|
Author |
Message |
|
TAGS:
|
|
|
Manager
Joined: 11 Jul 2012
Posts: 54
Followers: 6
Kudos [?]:
16
[0], given: 0
|
In 1979 lack of rain reduced India's rice production to [#permalink]
08 Aug 2012, 13:43
Question Stats:
63% (03:26) correct
36% (00:37) wrong based on 21 sessions
In 1979 lack of rain reduced India's rice production to about 41 million tons, nearly 25 percent less than those of the 1978 harvest.(A) less than those of the 1978 harvest (B) less than the 1978 harvest (C) less than 1978 (D) fewer than 1978 (E) fewer than that of India's 1978 harvest
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Director
Status: Final Countdown
Joined: 17 Mar 2010
Posts: 566
Location: India
GPA: 3.82
WE: Account Management (Retail Banking)
Followers: 10
Kudos [?]:
69
[0], given: 75
|
Re: In 1979 lack of rain reduced India's rice production to [#permalink]
08 Aug 2012, 21:26
"production"is non countable so "less than " should be used. CDE Out A Vs B X less than Y production less than harvest
_________________
" Make more efforts " Press Kudos if you liked my post
|
|
|
|
|
|
Intern
Joined: 07 Aug 2012
Posts: 4
Followers: 0
Kudos [?]:
0
[0], given: 0
|
Re: In 1979 lack of rain reduced India's rice production to [#permalink]
08 Aug 2012, 21:53
Can some one explain what's wrong with A
|
|
|
|
|
|
Intern
Joined: 29 May 2012
Posts: 9
Followers: 0
Kudos [?]:
0
[0], given: 4
|
Re: In 1979 lack of rain reduced India's rice production to [#permalink]
08 Aug 2012, 21:57
dabangg wrote: Can some one explain what's wrong with A A is wrong because those refers to tons . But we need to compare harvest total in one year to harvest total in another year.
Last edited by karthikguptav on 08 Aug 2012, 21:58, edited 1 time in total.
|
|
|
|
|
|
CEO
Status: Nothing comes easy: neither do I want.
Joined: 12 Oct 2009
Posts: 2759
Location: Malaysia
Concentration: Marketing, Entrepreneurship
GMAT 1: 670 Q49 V31 GMAT 2: 710 Q50 V35
Followers: 124
Kudos [?]:
637
[0], given: 221
|
Re: In 1979 lack of rain reduced India's rice production to [#permalink]
08 Aug 2012, 21:57
dabangg wrote: Can some one explain what's wrong with A In 1979 India's rice production was nearly 25 percent less than those of the 1978 harvest. does it make any sense? Rice production is singular so you can not use 'THOSE'
_________________
Fight for your dreams :For all those who fear from Verbal- lets give it a fight
Money Saved is the Money Earned 
Jo Bole So Nihaal , Sat Shri Akaal
Support GMAT Club by putting a GMAT Club badge on your blog/Facebook 
Find out what's new at GMAT Club - latest features and updates
Gmat test review : 670-to-710-a-long-journey-without-destination-still-happy-141642.html
|
|
|
|
|
|
Manager
Joined: 02 Jun 2011
Posts: 116
Followers: 0
Kudos [?]:
18
[0], given: 5
|
Re: In 1979 lack of rain reduced India's rice production to [#permalink]
08 Aug 2012, 22:43
betterscore wrote: In 1979 lack of rain reduced India's rice production to about 41 million tons, nearly 25 percent less than those of the 1978 harvest.
(A) less than those of the 1978 harvest
(B) less than the 1978 harvest
(C) less than 1978
(D) fewer than 1978
(E) fewer than that of India's 1978 harvest Less than in the start of phrase should be there so, D and E are out. however, after less than "that of" is required to make it parallel. "Those of" is wrong as it comes when noun is plural. "C' is also out. But why "B" is right I dont know. Anyone, please explain.
|
|
|
|
|
|
CEO
Status: Nothing comes easy: neither do I want.
Joined: 12 Oct 2009
Posts: 2759
Location: Malaysia
Concentration: Marketing, Entrepreneurship
GMAT 1: 670 Q49 V31 GMAT 2: 710 Q50 V35
Followers: 124
Kudos [?]:
637
[2] , given: 221
|
Re: In 1979 lack of rain reduced India's rice production to [#permalink]
08 Aug 2012, 23:06
2
This post received KUDOS
jitgoel wrote: betterscore wrote: In 1979 lack of rain reduced India's rice production to about 41 million tons, nearly 25 percent less than those of the 1978 harvest.
(A) less than those of the 1978 harvest
(B) less than the 1978 harvest
(C) less than 1978
(D) fewer than 1978
(E) fewer than that of India's 1978 harvest Less than in the start of phrase should be there so, D and E are out. however, after less than "that of" is required to make it parallel. "Those of" is wrong as it comes when noun is plural. "C' is also out. But why "B" is right I dont know. Anyone, please explain. less than that of 1978 => right less than that of 1978 harvest => wrong. My weight is less than that of you => right My weight is less than your weight => right ( similar to option 2) My weight is less than that of your weight => wrong ? what is that of your weight? you can not compare my weight with something which is " that of your weight".
_________________
Fight for your dreams :For all those who fear from Verbal- lets give it a fight
Money Saved is the Money Earned 
Jo Bole So Nihaal , Sat Shri Akaal
Support GMAT Club by putting a GMAT Club badge on your blog/Facebook 
Find out what's new at GMAT Club - latest features and updates
Gmat test review : 670-to-710-a-long-journey-without-destination-still-happy-141642.html
|
|
|
|
|
|
Manager
Joined: 02 Jun 2011
Posts: 116
Followers: 0
Kudos [?]:
18
[0], given: 5
|
Re: In 1979 lack of rain reduced India's rice production to [#permalink]
08 Aug 2012, 23:53
gurpreetsingh wrote: jitgoel wrote: betterscore wrote: In 1979 lack of rain reduced India's rice production to about 41 million tons, nearly 25 percent less than those of the 1978 harvest.
(A) less than those of the 1978 harvest
(B) less than the 1978 harvest
(C) less than 1978
(D) fewer than 1978
(E) fewer than that of India's 1978 harvest Less than in the start of phrase should be there so, D and E are out. however, after less than "that of" is required to make it parallel. "Those of" is wrong as it comes when noun is plural. "C' is also out. But why "B" is right I dont know. Anyone, please explain. less than that of 1978 => right less than that of 1978 harvest => wrong. My weight is less than that of you => right My weight is less than your weight => right ( similar to option 2) My weight is less than that of your weight => wrong ? what is that of your weight? you can not compare my weight with something which is " that of your weight". But in 'B' we are comparing production with the harvest, which might not be correct. Production with production will be ok.
|
|
|
|
|
|
CEO
Status: Nothing comes easy: neither do I want.
Joined: 12 Oct 2009
Posts: 2759
Location: Malaysia
Concentration: Marketing, Entrepreneurship
GMAT 1: 670 Q49 V31 GMAT 2: 710 Q50 V35
Followers: 124
Kudos [?]:
637
[0], given: 221
|
Re: In 1979 lack of rain reduced India's rice production to [#permalink]
09 Aug 2012, 00:39
jitgoel wrote: But in 'B' we are comparing production with the harvest, which might not be correct. Production with production will be ok. You don't need the attributes to be similar in terms of exact meaning. The attributes should be logically similar. PS: production of crops is quite symbolic to harvest !!
_________________
Fight for your dreams :For all those who fear from Verbal- lets give it a fight
Money Saved is the Money Earned 
Jo Bole So Nihaal , Sat Shri Akaal
Support GMAT Club by putting a GMAT Club badge on your blog/Facebook 
Find out what's new at GMAT Club - latest features and updates
Gmat test review : 670-to-710-a-long-journey-without-destination-still-happy-141642.html
|
|
|
|
|
|
Intern
Joined: 05 Apr 2012
Posts: 24
Followers: 0
Kudos [?]:
1
[0], given: 12
|
Re: In 1979 lack of rain reduced India's rice production to [#permalink]
11 Aug 2012, 11:02
betterscore wrote: In 1979 lack of rain reduced India's rice production to about 41 million tons, nearly 25 percent less than those of the 1978 harvest.
(A) less than those of the 1978 harvest
(B) less than the 1978 harvest
(C) less than 1978
(D) fewer than 1978
(E) fewer than that of India's 1978 harvest It is B. 1979 rice production is compared with 1978 harvest. Hope it helps!
|
|
|
|
|
|
Manager
Status: Bunuel's fan!
Joined: 08 Jul 2011
Posts: 213
Followers: 0
Kudos [?]:
6
[0], given: 47
|
Re: In 1979 lack of rain reduced India's rice production to [#permalink]
21 Dec 2012, 10:48
So if (E) fewer than that of India's 1978 harvest
was changed to
(e) less than that of...
Will that be a correct choice?
Thanks
|
|
|
|
|
|
Manhattan GMAT Instructor
Joined: 22 Mar 2011
Posts: 233
Followers: 63
Kudos [?]:
105
[1] , given: 6
|
Re: In 1979 lack of rain reduced India's rice production to [#permalink]
21 Dec 2012, 13:52
1
This post received KUDOS
We only want to use "that of" or "those of" if we are comparing something *belonging* to something else: The design of the new tablet is similar to that of its predecessor. (The design of one is similar to the design of the other.) Jack wanted clothes similar to those of his friends. (He wants his clothes to be similar to his friends' clothes.) In the above examples, it would be a big problem to get rid of the relative pronoun: The design of the new tablet is similar to its predecessor. (The design is similar to the predecessor?) Jack wanted clothes similar to his friends. (He wants his clothes to be similar to his friends?) In B, we are correctly comparing the production in 1979 to the harvest in 1978. If we go with gmatfighter12's proposed phrasing, "less than that of," we have to ask what "that" stands for. If we say "less than that of the 1978 harvest," then "that" doesn't seem to stand for anything. If we say "less than that of 1978," the antecedent for "that" isn't entirely clear, although "production" seems like the most reasonable choice. E would then be clearer than the other wrong answer choices, but still not as clear as B. Note that in my examples, it was very clear what "that" and "those" stood for. If we don't know what our pronouns stand for, we should probably replace them. In general, a specific noun is preferable to a vague pronoun (unless that specific noun is clearly wrong!).
_________________
Dmitry Farber | Manhattan GMAT Instructor | New York
Manhattan GMAT Discount | Manhattan GMAT Course Reviews | View Instructor Profile | Manhattan GMAT Reviews
|
|
|
|
|
|
Senior Manager
Joined: 09 Jun 2010
Posts: 456
Followers: 0
Kudos [?]:
14
[0], given: 39
|
Re: In 1979 lack of rain reduced India's rice production to [#permalink]
23 Dec 2012, 07:18
when the number is big, we use "less" not " fewer" , though the number is countable
is that right? I am not clear of this point.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Manhattan GMAT Instructor
Joined: 22 Mar 2011
Posts: 233
Followers: 63
Kudos [?]:
105
[1] , given: 6
|
Re: In 1979 lack of rain reduced India's rice production to [#permalink]
23 Dec 2012, 11:53
1
This post received KUDOS
No, size makes no difference. We always use "fewer" for countable and "less" for uncountable. Here, we use "less" rather than "fewer" because we are comparing the overall size of production, rather than the specific number of tons. This generally happens with weights and measures. For instance, I would say "I weigh less than 200 pounds," not fewer, because I am talking about a measurement, not a group of things. I'd also say "I want less than 3 ounces of coffee" or "I have less than 5 feet of rope left." Sure, we can count pounds, ounces, and feet, but we are using them to talk about an amount, not a number. 3 ounces of coffee is a way of saying how much coffee you have, but we're not counting individual coffee beans. Similarly, in the original problem, we're not counting individual grains of rice; rather, we're measuring overall rice production.
_________________
Dmitry Farber | Manhattan GMAT Instructor | New York
Manhattan GMAT Discount | Manhattan GMAT Course Reviews | View Instructor Profile | Manhattan GMAT Reviews
|
|
|
|
|
|
Senior Manager
Joined: 09 Jun 2010
Posts: 456
Followers: 0
Kudos [?]:
14
[0], given: 39
|
Re: In 1979 lack of rain reduced India's rice production to [#permalink]
30 Dec 2012, 00:11
"less" is used for non countable. "few" is used for countable
why "few" in D and E are wrong?
|
|
|
|
|
|
Senior Manager
Joined: 27 Jun 2012
Posts: 413
Followers: 23
Kudos [?]:
194
[0], given: 171
|
Re: In 1979 lack of rain reduced India's rice production to [#permalink]
30 Dec 2012, 00:43
thangvietnam, check above for the explanation given by Dmitry Farber from MGMAT. He has explained why use "Less" rather than "Fewer" to compare the measurements or weights.
_________________
Thanks, PraPon
VOTE: vote-best-gmat-practice-tests-excluding-gmatprep-144859.html Tough RCs: Passage1 | Passage2 | Passage3 | Passage4 | Passage5 | Passage6 | Passage7
|
|
|
|
|
|
Manager
Joined: 13 Oct 2012
Posts: 79
Concentration: General Management, Leadership
GMAT 1: 760 Q49 V46
Followers: 1
Kudos [?]:
-17
[0], given: 0
|
Re: In 1979 lack of rain reduced India's rice production to [#permalink]
03 Jan 2013, 17:21
B is correct. Rice production is correctly compared with harvest while the comparisons in other options are not correct
|
|
|
|
|
|
Senior Manager
Joined: 09 Jun 2010
Posts: 456
Followers: 0
Kudos [?]:
14
[0], given: 39
|
Re: In 1979 lack of rain reduced India's rice production to [#permalink]
15 Jan 2013, 04:01
DmitryFarber wrote: No, size makes no difference. We always use "fewer" for countable and "less" for uncountable. Here, we use "less" rather than "fewer" because we are comparing the overall size of production, rather than the specific number of tons. This generally happens with weights and measures. For instance, I would say "I weigh less than 200 pounds," not fewer, because I am talking about a measurement, not a group of things. I'd also say "I want less than 3 ounces of coffee" or "I have less than 5 feet of rope left." Sure, we can count pounds, ounces, and feet, but we are using them to talk about an amount, not a number. 3 ounces of coffee is a way of saying how much coffee you have, but we're not counting individual coffee beans. Similarly, in the original problem, we're not counting individual grains of rice; rather, we're measuring overall rice production. great, thank you, manhantan expert. I am satisfied with oa but In 1979 lack of rain reduced India's rice production to about 41 million tons, nearly 25 percent //less than those of the 1978 harvest.// (A) less than those of the 1978 harvest (B) less than the 1978 harvest (C) less than 1978 (D) fewer than 1978 (E) fewer than that of India's 1978 harvest but "less than the 1978 harvest" modify "production" or " 41 million tons" pls, help
|
|
|
|
|
|
Intern
Joined: 18 Jan 2013
Posts: 8
Followers: 0
Kudos [?]:
5
[0], given: 2
|
Re: In 1979 lack of rain reduced India's rice production to [#permalink]
26 Jan 2013, 01:24
dabangg wrote: Can some one explain what's wrong with A Here those of is not clear.Where/what exactly it is pointing?. To the harvest?country?. Remove the word and the sentence becomes clear
|
|
|
|
|
|
Senior Manager
Joined: 09 Jun 2010
Posts: 456
Followers: 0
Kudos [?]:
14
[0], given: 39
|
Re: In 1979 lack of rain reduced India's rice production to [#permalink]
01 Feb 2013, 03:52
DmitryFarber wrote: No, size makes no difference. We always use "fewer" for countable and "less" for uncountable. Here, we use "less" rather than "fewer" because we are comparing the overall size of production, rather than the specific number of tons. This generally happens with weights and measures. For instance, I would say "I weigh less than 200 pounds," not fewer, because I am talking about a measurement, not a group of things. I'd also say "I want less than 3 ounces of coffee" or "I have less than 5 feet of rope left." Sure, we can count pounds, ounces, and feet, but we are using them to talk about an amount, not a number. 3 ounces of coffee is a way of saying how much coffee you have, but we're not counting individual coffee beans. Similarly, in the original problem, we're not counting individual grains of rice; rather, we're measuring overall rice production. THANK YOU expert, do you have any tips for "few " and "less" , pls help
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Re: In 1979 lack of rain reduced India's rice production to
[#permalink]
01 Feb 2013, 03:52
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Moderators:
metallicafan, rajeevrks27, souvik101990, PTK, MacFauz, noboru, kissthegmat, carcass, willigetmylifeback, mikemcgarry, doe007, Vercules, Legendaddy, tuanquang269, Marcab, Narenn, GetThisDone
|