m01#9 : Retired Discussions [Locked]
Check GMAT Club Decision Tracker for the Latest School Decision Releases http://gmatclub.com/AppTrack

 It is currently 24 Jan 2017, 05:41

### GMAT Club Daily Prep

#### Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

# Events & Promotions

###### Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

# m01#9

Author Message
Manager
Status: GMAT in 4 weeks
Joined: 28 Mar 2010
Posts: 184
GPA: 3.89
Followers: 2

Kudos [?]: 141 [0], given: 25

### Show Tags

21 Jul 2011, 03:48
The population of Linterhast was 3,600 people in 1990 and 4,800 people in 1993. If the population growth rate per thousand is constant, then what will be the population in 1996?

6,000
6,400
7,200
8,000
9,600

Official solution:
This is a set rate problem. If the population grew by 1,200 people in the past three years, then it grew by 33 percent:
$$\frac{4800-3600}{3600} = \frac{1200}{3600} = \frac{1}{3} \approx 33%$$

Therefore in the next three years the population will grow at the same rate of 33% because the growth rate has been constant.

$$4,800 + \frac{1}{3}*4,800 = 4,800 + 1,600 = 6,400$$

Another approach is to backsolve by comparing the ratio of each answer to 4,800. For example, the ratio of 7,200 to 4,800 is not the same as the ratio of 4,800 to 3,600.
_________________

If you liked my post, please consider a Kudos for me. Thanks!

Manager
Status: GMAT in 4 weeks
Joined: 28 Mar 2010
Posts: 184
GPA: 3.89
Followers: 2

Kudos [?]: 141 [0], given: 25

### Show Tags

21 Jul 2011, 03:51
Problem with the solution is that it is assuming that rate is constant per 3 years... i.e. 33 % over a period o where mentioned in the question....
If assumed that increase rate is constant over the period of 1 year then problem is very diff.
_________________

If you liked my post, please consider a Kudos for me. Thanks!

Senior Manager
Status: mba here i come!
Joined: 07 Aug 2011
Posts: 270
Followers: 43

Kudos [?]: 1058 [1] , given: 48

### Show Tags

27 Aug 2011, 00:14
1
KUDOS
a much faster way would be:
growth rate = 4800/3600 = 4/3

pop in '96 = 4800*4/3 = 6400
_________________

press +1 Kudos to appreciate posts

Manager
Affiliations: University of Tehran
Joined: 06 Feb 2011
Posts: 203
Location: Iran (Islamic Republic of)
Concentration: Marketing
Schools: Wharton
GMAT 1: 680 Q45 V38
GPA: 4
WE: Marketing (Retail)
Followers: 8

Kudos [?]: 37 [0], given: 57

### Show Tags

20 Oct 2011, 00:50
Why can't we add the average yearly increase (400) to following three years (1994, 95 and 96) to get 6000?
_________________

Ambition, Motivation and Determination: the three "tion"s that lead to PERFECTION.

World! Respect Iran and Iranians as they respect you! Leave the governments with their own.

Manager
Joined: 21 Aug 2010
Posts: 189
Location: United States
GMAT 1: 700 Q49 V35
Followers: 2

Kudos [?]: 98 [0], given: 141

### Show Tags

21 Oct 2011, 12:52
saeedt wrote:
Why can't we add the average yearly increase (400) to following three years (1994, 95 and 96) to get 6000?

Because the question says "If the population growth rate per thousand is constant, then what will be the population in 1996?"

If it is mentioned anything like "if the population increased each year at constant number" then your method is correct
_________________

-------------------------------------

Re: m01#9   [#permalink] 21 Oct 2011, 12:52
Display posts from previous: Sort by

# m01#9

Moderator: Bunuel

 Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group and phpBB SEO Kindly note that the GMAT® test is a registered trademark of the Graduate Management Admission Council®, and this site has neither been reviewed nor endorsed by GMAC®.