Find all School-related info fast with the new School-Specific MBA Forum

It is currently 23 Jul 2014, 05:01

Close

GMAT Club Daily Prep

Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.

Events & Promotions

Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

Some scientists believe that 65 million years ago an

  Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  
Author Message
TAGS:
SVP
SVP
avatar
Joined: 16 Jul 2009
Posts: 1634
Schools: CBS
WE 1: 4 years (Consulting)
Followers: 30

Kudos [?]: 205 [0], given: 2

GMAT Tests User
Some scientists believe that 65 million years ago an [#permalink] New post 27 Sep 2009, 10:14
2
This post was
BOOKMARKED
00:00
A
B
C
D
E

Difficulty:

  5% (low)

Question Stats:

62% (02:40) correct 38% (01:51) wrong based on 82 sessions
Some scientists believe that 65 million years ago an asteroid struck what is now the Yucatan Peninsula, thereby causing extinction of the dinosaurs. These scientists have established that such a strike could have hurled enough debris into the atmosphere to block sunlight and cool the atmosphere. Without adequate sunlight, food sources for herbivorous dinosaurs would have disappeared, and no dinosaurs could have survived a prolonged period of low temperatures. These same scientists, however, have also established that most debris launched by the asteroid would have settled to the ground within six months, too soon for the plants to disappear or the dinosaurs to freeze.
Which one of the following, if true, most helps to resolve the apparent discrepancy between the scientists’ beliefs and the scientists’ results, as described above?
(A) Loss of the herbivorous dinosaurs would have deprived the carnivorous dinosaurs of their food source.
(B) Dinosaurs inhabited most landmasses on the planet but were not especially abundant in the area of the asteroid strike.
(C) A cloud of debris capable of diminishing sunlight by 20 percent would have cooled the earth’s surface by 7 to 10 degrees Celsius.
(D) The asteroid was at least 9.6 km in diameter, large enough for many dinosaurs to be killed by the strike itself and by subsequent tidal waves.
(E) Dinosaurs were susceptible to fatal respiratory problems cause by contamination of the air by asteroid debris.

_________________

The sky is the limit
800 is the limit


Get the best GMAT Prep Resources with GMAT Club Premium Membership

Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 01 Jul 2009
Posts: 193
GMAT 1: 720 Q50 V35
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 11 [0], given: 25

Re: dinosaurs [#permalink] New post 27 Sep 2009, 10:22
noboru wrote:
Some scientists believe that 65 million years ago an asteroid struck what is now the Yucatan Peninsula, thereby causing extinction of the dinosaurs. These scientists have established that such a strike could have hurled enough debris into the atmosphere to block sunlight and cool the atmosphere. Without adequate sunlight, food sources for herbivorous dinosaurs would have disappeared, and no dinosaurs could have survived a prolonged period of low temperatures. These same scientists, however, have also established that most debris launched by the asteroid would have settled to the ground within six months, too soon for the plants to disappear or the dinosaurs to freeze.
Which one of the following, if true, most helps to resolve the apparent discrepancy between the scientists’ beliefs and the scientists’ results, as described above?
(A) Loss of the herbivorous dinosaurs would have deprived the carnivorous dinosaurs of their food source.
(B) Dinosaurs inhabited most landmasses on the planet but were not especially abundant in the area of the asteroid strike.
(C) A cloud of debris capable of diminishing sunlight by 20 percent would have cooled the earth’s surface by 7 to 10 degrees Celsius.
(D) The asteroid was at least 9.6 km in diameter, large enough for many dinosaurs to be killed by the strike itself and by subsequent tidal waves.
(E) Dinosaurs were susceptible to fatal respiratory problems cause by contamination of the air by asteroid debris.


I think A, B, and D are irrelevant.

Since the passage claims that 6 months was enough to freeze the dinosaurs and kill plants I drop C as well. E seems the right answer, since dinosaurs with respiratory problems could've easily died of contamination. And maybe the CO2 levels in the atmosphere were affected as well, killing the plants on the earth. (This last one is an assumption though.)

So, IMO E.

_________________

Believe in yourself.

SVP
SVP
avatar
Joined: 16 Jul 2009
Posts: 1634
Schools: CBS
WE 1: 4 years (Consulting)
Followers: 30

Kudos [?]: 205 [0], given: 2

GMAT Tests User
Re: dinosaurs [#permalink] New post 27 Sep 2009, 10:36
arammug wrote:
noboru wrote:
Some scientists believe that 65 million years ago an asteroid struck what is now the Yucatan Peninsula, thereby causing extinction of the dinosaurs. These scientists have established that such a strike could have hurled enough debris into the atmosphere to block sunlight and cool the atmosphere. Without adequate sunlight, food sources for herbivorous dinosaurs would have disappeared, and no dinosaurs could have survived a prolonged period of low temperatures. These same scientists, however, have also established that most debris launched by the asteroid would have settled to the ground within six months, too soon for the plants to disappear or the dinosaurs to freeze.
Which one of the following, if true, most helps to resolve the apparent discrepancy between the scientists’ beliefs and the scientists’ results, as described above?
(A) Loss of the herbivorous dinosaurs would have deprived the carnivorous dinosaurs of their food source.
(B) Dinosaurs inhabited most landmasses on the planet but were not especially abundant in the area of the asteroid strike.
(C) A cloud of debris capable of diminishing sunlight by 20 percent would have cooled the earth’s surface by 7 to 10 degrees Celsius.
(D) The asteroid was at least 9.6 km in diameter, large enough for many dinosaurs to be killed by the strike itself and by subsequent tidal waves.
(E) Dinosaurs were susceptible to fatal respiratory problems cause by contamination of the air by asteroid debris.


I think A, B, and D are irrelevant.

Since the passage claims that 6 months was enough to freeze the dinosaurs and kill plants I drop C as well. E seems the right answer, since dinosaurs with respiratory problems could've easily died of contamination. And maybe the CO2 levels in the atmosphere were affected as well, killing the plants on the earth. (This last one is an assumption though.)

So, IMO E.


Could u explain bit further why you see D irrelevant?
Thanks

_________________

The sky is the limit
800 is the limit


Get the best GMAT Prep Resources with GMAT Club Premium Membership

Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 14 Dec 2008
Posts: 171
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 14 [0], given: 39

GMAT Tests User
Re: dinosaurs [#permalink] New post 27 Sep 2009, 10:38
my ans = D
Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 24 Sep 2009
Posts: 111
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 3 [0], given: 2

Re: dinosaurs [#permalink] New post 27 Sep 2009, 19:40
Very confused between A and E, but I'll go with A because this is the only one resolve the paradox.
Even though the dinosaurs didn't die due to freeze (because debris settled down soon), but herbivorous dinosaurs all died because lack of sunlight lead to lack of food sources, according to A, loss of the herbivorous dinosaurs would affect the food source of the carnivorous dinosaurs.

_________________

http://www.online-stopwatch.com/
http://gmatsentencecorrection.blogspot.com/

Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 08 Nov 2005
Posts: 182
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 13 [0], given: 10

GMAT Tests User
Re: dinosaurs [#permalink] New post 27 Sep 2009, 21:17
IMO D
Whats OA?
Intern
Intern
avatar
Joined: 26 Jul 2009
Posts: 17
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 5 [0], given: 8

Re: dinosaurs [#permalink] New post 28 Sep 2009, 01:44
noboru wrote:
arammug wrote:
noboru wrote:
Some scientists believe that 65 million years ago an asteroid struck what is now the Yucatan Peninsula, thereby causing extinction of the dinosaurs. These scientists have established that such a strike could have hurled enough debris into the atmosphere to block sunlight and cool the atmosphere. Without adequate sunlight, food sources for herbivorous dinosaurs would have disappeared, and no dinosaurs could have survived a prolonged period of low temperatures. These same scientists, however, have also established that most debris launched by the asteroid would have settled to the ground within six months, too soon for the plants to disappear or the dinosaurs to freeze.
Which one of the following, if true, most helps to resolve the apparent discrepancy between the scientists’ beliefs and the scientists’ results, as described above?
(A) Loss of the herbivorous dinosaurs would have deprived the carnivorous dinosaurs of their food source.
(B) Dinosaurs inhabited most landmasses on the planet but were not especially abundant in the area of the asteroid strike.
(C) A cloud of debris capable of diminishing sunlight by 20 percent would have cooled the earth’s surface by 7 to 10 degrees Celsius.
(D) The asteroid was at least 9.6 km in diameter, large enough for many dinosaurs to be killed by the strike itself and by subsequent tidal waves.
(E) Dinosaurs were susceptible to fatal respiratory problems cause by contamination of the air by asteroid debris.


I think A, B, and D are irrelevant.

Since the passage claims that 6 months was enough to freeze the dinosaurs and kill plants I drop C as well. E seems the right answer, since dinosaurs with respiratory problems could've easily died of contamination. And maybe the CO2 levels in the atmosphere were affected as well, killing the plants on the earth. (This last one is an assumption though.)

So, IMO E.


Could u explain bit further why you see D irrelevant?
Thanks



A is irrelevant because no where it is mentioned that food resources were diminished after the strike..
D is irrelevant becoz ....it only talks about many not all dinosaurs ...
E resolves the discrepancy very well...
Manager
Manager
User avatar
Joined: 28 Jul 2009
Posts: 156
Followers: 3

Kudos [?]: 26 [0], given: 4

Re: dinosaurs [#permalink] New post 28 Sep 2009, 03:00
One more for E.

After event in D some could survive breed.
E clearly explaines the paradox.
Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 31 Aug 2009
Posts: 58
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 5 [0], given: 0

Re: dinosaurs [#permalink] New post 28 Sep 2009, 03:24
C or D.

I go with C. I think D offers an alternative reason to extinction, why extinction occurred despite debris settling quickly. I think the correct answer should link the debris with the process of extinction. C does so. That's my GUESS.
Intern
Intern
avatar
Joined: 01 Sep 2009
Posts: 34
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 2 [0], given: 4

Re: dinosaurs [#permalink] New post 28 Sep 2009, 05:52
E... it gives a reason why the dinosaurs could have been killed off without depending on temperature or starvation. But also explains this would have been caused by the asteroid.. supporting the original claim
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
avatar
Joined: 17 Jul 2009
Posts: 301
Concentration: Nonprofit, Strategy
GPA: 3.42
WE: Engineering (Computer Hardware)
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 28 [0], given: 9

GMAT Tests User
Re: dinosaurs [#permalink] New post 28 Sep 2009, 16:55
agree with E, D talks about most but not all dinosaurs...most dinosaur dying does not equal to extinction..
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
avatar
Status: Yeah well whatever.
Joined: 18 Sep 2009
Posts: 347
Location: United States
GMAT 1: 660 Q42 V39
GMAT 2: 730 Q48 V42
GPA: 3.49
WE: Analyst (Insurance)
Followers: 5

Kudos [?]: 47 [0], given: 17

GMAT Tests User
Re: dinosaurs [#permalink] New post 28 Sep 2009, 18:47
E.... It's the only one that provides an alternative consequence of the asteroid that would have killed off all the dinosaurs in the short time (you can't hold your breath that long).

_________________

He that is in me > he that is in the world. - source 1 John 4:4

Manager
Manager
User avatar
Joined: 21 May 2009
Posts: 136
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 4 [0], given: 47

CAT Tests
Re: dinosaurs [#permalink] New post 28 Sep 2009, 21:23
Even i would go with E
E is convincing than the rest of them
Manager
Manager
User avatar
Joined: 10 Jul 2009
Posts: 131
Location: Ukraine, Kyiv
Followers: 2

Kudos [?]: 27 [0], given: 60

Re: dinosaurs [#permalink] New post 27 Oct 2009, 12:24
noboru wrote:
Some scientists believe that 65 million years ago an asteroid struck what is now the Yucatan Peninsula, thereby causing extinction of the dinosaurs. These scientists have established that such a strike could have hurled enough debris into the atmosphere to block sunlight and cool the atmosphere. Without adequate sunlight, food sources for herbivorous dinosaurs would have disappeared, and no dinosaurs could have survived a prolonged period of low temperatures. These same scientists, however, have also established that most debris launched by the asteroid would have settled to the ground within six months, too soon for the plants to disappear or the dinosaurs to freeze.
Which one of the following, if true, most helps to resolve the apparent discrepancy between the scientists’ beliefs and the scientists’ results, as described above?
(A) Loss of the herbivorous dinosaurs would have deprived the carnivorous dinosaurs of their food source.
We are talking here about fast cause of extinction. I believe there must be a longer period of time (>6months) in order all carnivorous dinos to kill herbivorous ones.
(B) Dinosaurs inhabited most landmasses on the planet but were not especially abundant in the area of the asteroid strike.completely irrelevant.
(C) A cloud of debris capable of diminishing sunlight by 20 percent would have cooled the earth’s surface by 7 to 10 degrees Celsius.this choice states concrete facts about the freezing processes. we do not need that.
(D) The asteroid was at least 9.6 km in diameter, large enough for many dinosaurs to be killed by the strike itself and by subsequent tidal waves.ok, D. very popular choice here. However, it presents an evidence about the size of the asteroid and its consequences. In the argument there is an information about debris and/or freezing, not tidal waves or the size of an asteroid. In addition, it is stated that 6 months is a short period for plants to disappear. If there were waves - where were the plants then?
(E) Dinosaurs were susceptible to fatal respiratory problems cause by contamination of the air by asteroid debris. best choice. in the scope of the argument and provides an alternative reason why plants survived and dinos did not.


E.

critics welcomed.

_________________

Never, never, never give up

Senior Manager
Senior Manager
avatar
Joined: 16 Apr 2009
Posts: 341
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 45 [0], given: 14

GMAT Tests User
Re: dinosaurs [#permalink] New post 27 Oct 2009, 16:58
E clearly resolves the paradox . explanations already provided in greater length

_________________

Always tag your question

Intern
Intern
avatar
Joined: 04 Oct 2009
Posts: 2
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 0 [0], given: 0

Re: dinosaurs [#permalink] New post 27 Oct 2009, 18:23
IMO E,

This option properly resolve the paradox
Manager
Manager
User avatar
Joined: 08 Oct 2009
Posts: 71
Location: Denmark, Europe
Schools: Darden Class of 2012
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 12 [0], given: 6

Re: dinosaurs [#permalink] New post 27 Oct 2009, 22:02
noboru wrote:
Some scientists believe that 65 million years ago an asteroid struck what is now the Yucatan Peninsula, thereby causing extinction of the dinosaurs. These scientists have established that such a strike could have hurled enough debris into the atmosphere to block sunlight and cool the atmosphere. Without adequate sunlight, food sources for herbivorous dinosaurs would have disappeared, and no dinosaurs could have survived a prolonged period of low temperatures. These same scientists, however, have also established that most debris launched by the asteroid would have settled to the ground within six months, too soon for the plants to disappear or the dinosaurs to freeze.
Which one of the following, if true, most helps to resolve the apparent discrepancy between the scientists’ beliefs and the scientists’ results, as described above?
(A) Loss of the herbivorous dinosaurs would have deprived the carnivorous dinosaurs of their food source.
(B) Dinosaurs inhabited most landmasses on the planet but were not especially abundant in the area of the asteroid strike.
(C) A cloud of debris capable of diminishing sunlight by 20 percent would have cooled the earth’s surface by 7 to 10 degrees Celsius.
(D) The asteroid was at least 9.6 km in diameter, large enough for many dinosaurs to be killed by the strike itself and by subsequent tidal waves.
(E) Dinosaurs were susceptible to fatal respiratory problems cause by contamination of the air by asteroid debris.


Its E.

A assumes that the herbivorous dinosaurs became extinct. Yet we are told in the Q that the debris settled before plants died an thus there is no basis for concluding that the herbivorous dinosaurs became extinct.

B is completely irrelevant as is C.

D as others have mentioned the key-word here is many. The death of many dinosaurs is NOT equal to the extinction of dinosaurs.

E:This sentence explains why dinosaurs died from the impact even though the plants did not die and it wasn't cold enough for them to freeze to death. Therefore it solves the paradox.
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
avatar
Joined: 12 Oct 2009
Posts: 272
Schools: Columbia, INSEAD, RSM, LBS
Followers: 2

Kudos [?]: 29 [0], given: 4

GMAT Tests User
Re: dinosaurs [#permalink] New post 27 Oct 2009, 22:23
IMO E
"Many" is a keyword to negate option D
Intern
Intern
avatar
Joined: 20 Oct 2009
Posts: 11
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 0 [0], given: 0

Re: dinosaurs [#permalink] New post 28 Oct 2009, 06:19
Seems to be clearly E.

I've been wrong before tho
Intern
Intern
avatar
Joined: 29 Jul 2009
Posts: 16
Schools: Stanford, HBS, INSEAD
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 5 [0], given: 0

Re: dinosaurs [#permalink] New post 02 Nov 2009, 22:35
I'd go with E too!
Re: dinosaurs   [#permalink] 02 Nov 2009, 22:35
    Similar topics Author Replies Last post
Similar
Topics:
13 Experts publish their posts in the topic Sixty-five million years ago, according to some scientists, elevinty 29 22 May 2010, 22:27
Sixty Five Millions Years Ago,according to some nitindas 7 17 Aug 2009, 00:11
Sixty-five million years ago, according to some scientists, quiet888 3 04 May 2008, 17:21
1 Sixty-five million years ago, according to some scientists, tarek99 5 26 Jan 2008, 09:10
Sixty-five million years ago, according to some scientists, misterJJ2u 2 03 Jul 2007, 08:31
Display posts from previous: Sort by

Some scientists believe that 65 million years ago an

  Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  

Go to page    1   2    Next  [ 28 posts ] 



cron

GMAT Club MBA Forum Home| About| Privacy Policy| Terms and Conditions| GMAT Club Rules| Contact| Sitemap

Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group and phpBB SEO

Kindly note that the GMAT® test is a registered trademark of the Graduate Management Admission Council®, and this site has neither been reviewed nor endorsed by GMAC®.