|
Author |
Message |
|
Intern
Joined: 14 May 2007
Posts: 8
Followers: 0
Kudos [?]:
0
[0], given: 0
|
Curator: The decision to restore the cloak of the central figure in Veronese’s painting from its present red to the green found underneath is fully justified. Reliable x-ray and chemical tests show that the red pigment was applied after the painting had been completed, and that the red paint was not mixed in Veronese’s workshop. Hence it appears likely that an artist other than Veronese tampered with Veronese’s painting after its completion.
The assertion that a later artist tampered with Veronese's painting serves which one of the following functions in the curator's argument?
(A) It is the main point toward which the argument as a whole is directed.
(B) It is a subsidiary conclusion that supports the argument's main conclusion.
(C) It is a clarification of a key term of the argument.
(D) It is a particular instance of the general position to be defended.
(E) It is a reiteration of the main point that is made for the sake of emphasis.
I had tough choice between A and E
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Manager
Joined: 30 Mar 2007
Posts: 222
Followers: 1
Kudos [?]:
2
[0], given: 0
|
I think its B.
I am not sure if it can be between A and E
|
|
|
|
|
|
Intern
Joined: 19 May 2007
Posts: 30
Followers: 0
Kudos [?]:
2
[0], given: 0
|
Shall i stay with B, shall i go for E
Shall i stay with B, shall i go for E
:?
|
|
|
|
|
|
Intern
Joined: 14 May 2007
Posts: 8
Followers: 0
Kudos [?]:
0
[0], given: 0
|
well the OA is E
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Moderators:
metallicafan, rajeevrks27, Zarrolou, souvik101990, PTK, MacFauz, noboru, kissthegmat, carcass, willigetmylifeback, mikemcgarry, doe007, Vercules, Legendaddy, tuanquang269, RaviChandra, Marcab
|
close
