Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.

Thank you for using the timer!
We noticed you are actually not timing your practice. Click the START button first next time you use the timer.
There are many benefits to timing your practice, including:

Re: Data Sufficiency [#permalink]
12 Sep 2012, 19:58

1

This post received KUDOS

saurabhsingh24 wrote:

If n and m are integers, and x=3^n, and y=3^m, is the value of x greater than the value of 2y? (1) n=m+1 (2) n=2m

There will be three cases: when M is positive: option 1 is sufficient to answer. and option 2 also give answer When M is negative: Option 1 is sufficient to answer. But option 2 is not sufficient to answer. When M is Zero: option Option 1 is sufficient to answer But Option 2 is not sufficient to answer.

Try with some nos. for these three cases. If you like the post, kindly give me 1 kudos.

Re: If n and m are integers, and x=3^n, and y=3^m, is the value [#permalink]
13 Sep 2012, 00:32

3

This post received KUDOS

saurabhsingh24 wrote:

If n and m are integers, and x=3^n, and y=3^m, is the value of x greater than the value of 2y?

(1) n=m+1 (2) n=2m

The question is in fact "is 3^n>2\cdot{3^m}?"

(1) The given inequality becomes 3^{m+1}>2\cdot{3^m}. Dividing through by 3^m, which is for sure a positive number, we obtain 3 > 2, obviously true. Sufficient.

(2) Now the given inequality becomes 3^{2m}>2\cdot{3^m}. Dividing through again by 3^m, we obtain 3^m>2. This inequality holds only for m>0. Not sufficient.

Answer A. _________________

PhD in Applied Mathematics Love GMAT Quant questions and running.

Re: If n and m are integers, and x=3^n, and y=3^m, is the value [#permalink]
05 Sep 2013, 07:42

saurabhsingh24 wrote:

If n and m are integers, and x=3^n, and y=3^m, is the value of x greater than the value of 2y?

(1) n=m+1 (2) n=2m

Basically the Q asks whether 3^n> 2*3^m

St 1 substituting for n we get

3^(m+1) - 2*3^m > 0 3* 3^m -2 *3^m>0 3^m>0 ------> m can be 0 or 1 or 2 and so one so n= m+1 (1 or 2 or 3 for corresponding values of m) We see that 3^n > 2*3^m

So A is sufficient so ruling out B,C and E

From st 2 we have n= 2m

We get 3^2m -2*3^m>0 9*3^m - 2*3^m> 0 or 7*3^m>0

So m =0, n=0 ---->putting in the above equation we get (3^2m -2*3^m>0) --> 1-2 =-1 not greater than zero But if m=1,n=2 then we get 3^2m -2*3^m>0 ------>9-6>0 3>0 so 2 ans choices possible so D ruled out

Ans is A _________________

“If you can't fly then run, if you can't run then walk, if you can't walk then crawl, but whatever you do you have to keep moving forward.”

Re: If n and m are integers, and x=3^n, and y=3^m, is the value [#permalink]
18 Sep 2013, 17:35

Here is how I solved it, x = 3^n and y =3^m 1. n = m +1; therefore, x = 3^m+1 => 3 * 3^m, now 3^m = y, therefore x = 3y and hence x > 2y Sufficient 2. n =2m; x = 3^2m; x = y^2; now nothing is given about x and y; therefore for y = 0; x =0 and hence the x is not greater than 2y whereas if y =-1, x = 1 again not satisfied, if y = -2, x = 4 ; x = 2y; if y = 3, x = 9; hence NS

Therefore answer is .A.

Please let me know in case my line of reasoning is not correct, especially for the second statement.

gmatclubot

Re: If n and m are integers, and x=3^n, and y=3^m, is the value
[#permalink]
18 Sep 2013, 17:35