Last visit was: 20 Nov 2025, 00:45 It is currently 20 Nov 2025, 00:45
Close
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Close
Request Expert Reply
Confirm Cancel
Sub 505 Level|   Word Problems|                                          
User avatar
Bunuel
User avatar
Math Expert
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Last visit: 20 Nov 2025
Posts: 105,408
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 99,987
Products:
Expert
Expert reply
Active GMAT Club Expert! Tag them with @ followed by their username for a faster response.
Posts: 105,408
Kudos: 778,421
 [41]
2
Kudos
Add Kudos
39
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Most Helpful Reply
User avatar
Bunuel
User avatar
Math Expert
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Last visit: 20 Nov 2025
Posts: 105,408
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 99,987
Products:
Expert
Expert reply
Active GMAT Club Expert! Tag them with @ followed by their username for a faster response.
Posts: 105,408
Kudos: 778,421
 [22]
13
Kudos
Add Kudos
8
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
avatar
beatthegmat05
Joined: 13 Feb 2013
Last visit: 21 Sep 2021
Posts: 19
Own Kudos:
35
 [14]
Given Kudos: 3
Location: United States
Concentration: Finance, General Management
Schools: Harvard '24
GMAT Date: 07-28-2014
GPA: 3.75
WE:Consulting (Computer Software)
Schools: Harvard '24
Posts: 19
Kudos: 35
 [14]
9
Kudos
Add Kudos
5
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
General Discussion
User avatar
PrashantPonde
Joined: 27 Jun 2012
Last visit: 29 Jan 2025
Posts: 321
Own Kudos:
2,740
 [6]
Given Kudos: 185
Concentration: Strategy, Finance
Posts: 321
Kudos: 2,740
 [6]
6
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Consider the price per share as 'x'.
Given that, x*n = 12000

(1) If the price per share of the stock had been $1 more, the total price of the n shares would have been $300 more.
SUFFICIENT: this says \((x+1)*n=12000+300\). As we know \(xn=12000\), we can solve this equation to find out x & n. (no need to solve further)

(2) If the price per share of the stock had been $2 less, the total price of the n shares would have been 5 percent less.
SUFFICIENT: this says \((x-2)*n=12000 (1-\frac{5}{100})\). As we know \(xn=12000\), we can solve this equation to find out x & n. (no need to solve further)

Hence choice(D) is the answer.
User avatar
nutshell
Joined: 21 Mar 2011
Last visit: 04 Jul 2019
Posts: 95
Own Kudos:
298
 [1]
Given Kudos: 104
Status:GMATting
Concentration: Strategy, Technology
GMAT 1: 590 Q45 V27
GMAT 1: 590 Q45 V27
Posts: 95
Kudos: 298
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Since the total price of shares is given by no. of shares(n)*Price/share(p), we can make the following statement:
np=12,000;

The idea would be to equate given information with the information obtained from statements.

Statement(1):
n(p+1) = np(Total value) + 300;
np + n = np + 300;
=> n = 300;
From this, Price per share(p) can be determined; Sufficient;

Statement(2):
n(p-2) = np - (0.05)(12,000);
np - 2n = np - 600;
2n = 600;
=> n = 300;
From this, Price per share(p) can be determined; Sufficient;

Ans is (D).

Note: It is not even required to find n; If we understand that p can be determined from the statements alone, it is sufficient;
User avatar
stne
Joined: 27 May 2012
Last visit: 19 Nov 2025
Posts: 1,770
Own Kudos:
1,974
 [2]
Given Kudos: 658
Posts: 1,770
Kudos: 1,974
 [2]
2
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Since there are n shares which cost 12,000, therefore 1 share originally costs \(\frac{12,000}{n}\)

so we need n ( total shares) to get the value per share

(1) If the price per share of the stock had been $1 more, the total price of the n shares would have been $300 more.

\((\frac{12,000}{n}+1)*n\)= 12,300 we can get n , sufficient

(2) If the price per share of the stock had been $2 less, the total price of the n shares would have been 5 percent less.

\((\frac{12,000}{n}-2)*n\)= 11685, we can get n , sufficient

Answer D

( n= 300 therefore price per share is 40 )
avatar
riskietech
Joined: 03 Dec 2013
Last visit: 26 May 2018
Posts: 42
Own Kudos:
238
 [1]
Given Kudos: 35
Posts: 42
Kudos: 238
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
I think you are referring to OG Q review - 2nd Edition.


let share price = f

total share price = f*n

i) Consider st1: we can derive following equation:
(f+1)*n - fn = 300
n = 300
thus f = 12000/300 = 40
Sufficient

ii) Consider st2: we can derive following equation
(f-2)*n = 0.95 * f * n ... (5 % less mean new share equals 95% of old)
thus f = 2/0.05 = 40.
Sufficient.

Answer: D
Hope this helps!
User avatar
dave13
Joined: 09 Mar 2016
Last visit: 12 Aug 2025
Posts: 1,108
Own Kudos:
1,113
 [1]
Given Kudos: 3,851
Posts: 1,108
Kudos: 1,113
 [1]
Kudos
Add Kudos
1
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Bunuel
If the total price of n equally priced shares of a certain stock was $12,000, what was the price per share of the stock?

(1) If the price per share of the stock had been $1 more, the total price of the n shares would have been $300 more.
(2) If the price per share of the stock had been $2 less, the total price of the n shares would have been 5 percent less.

let \(n\) be total number of shares
let \(x\) be price per share

x*n = 12000

first statement :)

\((x+1)n = 12300\)

\(x = \frac{12000}{n}\) price per share original

(\(\frac{12000}{n}\) +1)n = \(12300\)

\(12000+n = 12300\)

\(n = 300\)

second statement :)

\((x-2)n =12000 -0.5xn\)

\(\frac{12000}{n} =x\) price per share (plu in in the first one)


\((\frac{12000}{n} -2)n = 11,400\)

\(12000- 2n = 11400\)

\(600 = 2n\)

\(n = 300\)


DDDDDDD :)­
avatar
gmatconqueror2018
Joined: 01 Nov 2018
Last visit: 13 Sep 2019
Posts: 63
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 8
GMAT 1: 690 Q48 V35
GPA: 3.88
Products:
GMAT 1: 690 Q48 V35
Posts: 63
Kudos: 35
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Hello, please let me know if my logic works for this problem. At first, I had no idea how to set up the probably algebraicly but realized each statement allows you to solve for one variable to determine the answer and hence D. This is what I originally thought:

12,000(Total Value)/X(Price per share)=12,300/X+1
Essentially, this is the change to the original equation which allows you to solve for the share price ($40)
Similarly, 12,000/x=11400/x-2 for statement 2 which again gets you $40 share price (11400>>> 95% of 12,000)
In the future, despite not knowing how to PROPERLY set up algebraic expressions and equations on certain DS questions, as long as I can see that I can solve for a particular variable, I can feel confident the statement will be sufficient?
User avatar
Basshead
Joined: 09 Jan 2020
Last visit: 07 Feb 2024
Posts: 925
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 432
Location: United States
Posts: 925
Kudos: 302
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
If the total price of n equally priced shares of a certain stock was $12,000, what was the price per share of the stock?

(1) If the price per share of the stock had been $1 more, the total price of the n shares would have been $300 more.

This statement directly tells us that there are 300 shares. We can conclude the price per share is $40. SUFFICIENT.

(2) If the price per share of the stock had been $2 less, the total price of the n shares would have been 5 percent less.

If the price had been $2 less, the total price would have been 5% less. This mean 100% = $40. SUFFICIENT.

Answer is D.
User avatar
ScottTargetTestPrep
User avatar
Target Test Prep Representative
Joined: 14 Oct 2015
Last visit: 19 Nov 2025
Posts: 21,717
Own Kudos:
26,998
 [3]
Given Kudos: 300
Status:Founder & CEO
Affiliations: Target Test Prep
Location: United States (CA)
Expert
Expert reply
Active GMAT Club Expert! Tag them with @ followed by their username for a faster response.
Posts: 21,717
Kudos: 26,998
 [3]
3
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Bunuel
The Official Guide For GMAT® Quantitative Review, 2ND Edition

If the total price of n equally priced shares of a certain stock was $12,000, what was the price per share of the stock?

(1) If the price per share of the stock had been $1 more, the total price of the n shares would have been $300 more.
(2) If the price per share of the stock had been $2 less, the total price of the n shares would have been 5 percent less.

Solution:

Question Stem Analysis:


We need to determine the price per share of the stock, given that the total price of n shares of this stock was $12,000. Therefore, the price per share of the stock was 12,000/n dollars. In other words, if we can determine the value of n, then we can determine the price per share of the stock.

Statement One Alone:

We can create the equation:

(12,000/n + 1) * n = 12,000 + 300

12,000 + n = 12,300

n = 300

Since n = 300, the price per share of the stock was 12,000/300 = $40. Statement one alone is sufficient.

Statement Two Alone:

(12,000/n - 2) * n = 12,000 * 0.95

12,000 - 2n = 11,400

600 = 2n

300 = n

Once again, we see the price per share of the stock was $40. Statement two alone is sufficient.

Answer: D
User avatar
piyushnagre99
Joined: 05 Aug 2024
Last visit: 19 Nov 2025
Posts: 29
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 184
Location: India
GPA: 3.2
Posts: 29
Kudos: 1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Hi Bunuel ,

Please help me understand how did you arrive at the following statements?

Quote:
$1 increase per share results in $300 increase of the total price, thus there must be 300 shares.

Quote:
$2 decrease per share results in 0.05*12,000=$600 decrease of the total price, thus there must be 600/2=300 shares.

Thanks,
Piyush
User avatar
Bunuel
User avatar
Math Expert
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Last visit: 20 Nov 2025
Posts: 105,408
Own Kudos:
778,421
 [1]
Given Kudos: 99,987
Products:
Expert
Expert reply
Active GMAT Club Expert! Tag them with @ followed by their username for a faster response.
Posts: 105,408
Kudos: 778,421
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
piyushnagre99
Hi Bunuel ,

Please help me understand how did you arrive at the following statements?





Thanks,
Piyush

Think of it like this:

If each share costs $1 more, then the total cost goes up by $1 for every share. Since the total went up by $300, there must be 300 shares.

If each share costs $2 less, the total goes down by $2 for every share. Since the total went down by $600, that means 600/2 = 300 shares.
Moderators:
Math Expert
105408 posts
496 posts