Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.

It appears that you are browsing the GMAT Club forum unregistered!

Signing up is free, quick, and confidential.
Join other 350,000 members and get the full benefits of GMAT Club

Registration gives you:

Tests

Take 11 tests and quizzes from GMAT Club and leading GMAT prep companies such as Manhattan GMAT,
Knewton, and others. All are free for GMAT Club members.

Applicant Stats

View detailed applicant stats such as GPA, GMAT score, work experience, location, application
status, and more

Books/Downloads

Download thousands of study notes,
question collections, GMAT Club’s
Grammar and Math books.
All are free!

Thank you for using the timer!
We noticed you are actually not timing your practice. Click the START button first next time you use the timer.
There are many benefits to timing your practice, including:

Re: If x^2+12x−k=0, is x=4? [#permalink]
05 Jul 2013, 11:54

2

This post received KUDOS

Expert's post

1

This post was BOOKMARKED

If x^2+12x−k=0, is x=4?

(1) (x+16) is a factor of x^2+12x−k=0, where k is a constant, and x is a variable. This implies that we can factor out \(x+16\) from \(x^2+12x-k=0\), so we would have \((x+16)*(something)=0\). Thus x=-16 is one of the roots of the given quadratic equation.

Viete's theorem states that for the roots \(x_1\) and \(x_2\) of a quadratic equation \(ax^2+bx+c=0\):

\(x_1+x_2=\frac{-b}{a}\) AND \(x_1*x_2=\frac{c}{a}\).

Thus according to the above \(x_1+x_2=-16+x_2=\frac{-12}{1}\) --> \(x_2=4\).

So, we have that x is either -16 or 4. Not sufficient.

(2) x≠−16. Clearly insufficient.

(1)+(2) Since (2) says that x is NOT -16, then x=4. Sufficient.

Re: If x^2+12x−k=0, is x=4? [#permalink]
05 Jul 2013, 12:01

Expert's post

Bunuel wrote:

If x^2+12x−k=0, is x=4?

(1) (x+16) is a factor of x^2+12x−k=0, where k is a constant, and x is a variable. This implies that we can factor out \(x+16\) from \(x^2+12x-k=0\), so we would have \((x+16)*(something)=0\). Thus x=-16 is one of the roots of the given quadratic equation.

Viete's theorem states that for the roots \(x_1\) and \(x_2\) of a quadratic equation \(ax^2+bx+c=0\):

\(x_1+x_2=\frac{-b}{a}\) AND \(x_1*x_2=\frac{c}{a}\).

Thus according to the above \(x_1+x_2=-16+x_2=\frac{-12}{1}\) --> \(x_2=4\).

So, we have that x is either -16 or 4. Not sufficient.

(2) x≠−16. Clearly insufficient.

(1)+(2) Since (2) says that x is NOT -16, then x=4. Sufficient.

Answer: C.

Hope it's clear.

(1)+(2)=> 1 says x=-16 and 2 says x is NOT -16...So,isn't it contradicting hence Insufficient..?

I'm having confusion at this point...Please help me understand! _________________

Re: If x^2+12x−k=0, is x=4? [#permalink]
05 Jul 2013, 12:04

Expert's post

debayan222 wrote:

Bunuel wrote:

If x^2+12x−k=0, is x=4?

(1) (x+16) is a factor of x^2+12x−k=0, where k is a constant, and x is a variable. This implies that we can factor out \(x+16\) from \(x^2+12x-k=0\), so we would have \((x+16)*(something)=0\). Thus x=-16 is one of the roots of the given quadratic equation.

Viete's theorem states that for the roots \(x_1\) and \(x_2\) of a quadratic equation \(ax^2+bx+c=0\):

\(x_1+x_2=\frac{-b}{a}\) AND \(x_1*x_2=\frac{c}{a}\).

Thus according to the above \(x_1+x_2=-16+x_2=\frac{-12}{1}\) --> \(x_2=4\).

So, we have that x is either -16 or 4. Not sufficient.

(2) x≠−16. Clearly insufficient.

(1)+(2) Since (2) says that x is NOT -16, then x=4. Sufficient.

Answer: C.

Hope it's clear.

(1)+(2)=> 1 says x=-16 and 2 says x is NOT -16...So,isn't it contradicting hence Insufficient..?

I'm having confusion at this point...Please help me understand!

(1) says that x=-16 OR x=4. The equation is \(x^2+12x-64=0\) (k=64) --> x=-16 OR x=4. _________________

Re: If x^2+12x−k=0, is x=4? [#permalink]
22 Aug 2013, 07:37

Bunuel wrote:

If x^2+12x−k=0, is x=4?

(1) (x+16) is a factor of x^2+12x−k=0, where k is a constant, and x is a variable. This implies that we can factor out \(x+16\) from \(x^2+12x-k=0\), so we would have \((x+16)*(something)=0\). Thus x=-16 is one of the roots of the given quadratic equation.

Viete's theorem states that for the roots \(x_1\) and \(x_2\) of a quadratic equation \(ax^2+bx+c=0\):

\(x_1+x_2=\frac{-b}{a}\) AND \(x_1*x_2=\frac{c}{a}\).

Thus according to the above \(x_1+x_2=-16+x_2=\frac{-12}{1}\) --> \(x_2=4\).

So, we have that x is either -16 or 4. Not sufficient.

(2) x≠−16. Clearly insufficient.

(1)+(2) Since (2) says that x is NOT -16, then x=4. Sufficient.

Answer: C.

Hope it's clear.

Why A is not sufficient? X cannot be -16, as in this case X+16 =0. As I know 0 cannot be a factor or the integer. Pls. explan

Re: If x^2+12x−k=0, is x=4? [#permalink]
22 Aug 2013, 08:46

Expert's post

Dmitriy wrote:

Bunuel wrote:

If x^2+12x−k=0, is x=4?

(1) (x+16) is a factor of x^2+12x−k=0, where k is a constant, and x is a variable. This implies that we can factor out \(x+16\) from \(x^2+12x-k=0\), so we would have \((x+16)*(something)=0\). Thus x=-16 is one of the roots of the given quadratic equation.

Viete's theorem states that for the roots \(x_1\) and \(x_2\) of a quadratic equation \(ax^2+bx+c=0\):

\(x_1+x_2=\frac{-b}{a}\) AND \(x_1*x_2=\frac{c}{a}\).

Thus according to the above \(x_1+x_2=-16+x_2=\frac{-12}{1}\) --> \(x_2=4\).

So, we have that x is either -16 or 4. Not sufficient.

(2) x≠−16. Clearly insufficient.

(1)+(2) Since (2) says that x is NOT -16, then x=4. Sufficient.

Answer: C.

Hope it's clear.

Why A is not sufficient? X cannot be -16, as in this case X+16 =0. As I know 0 cannot be a factor or the integer. Pls. explan

Factor of a number and factor of an expression are two different things. For example, both (x+16) and (x-4) are factors of x^2+12x−64=0 --> (x+16)(x-4)=0.

Re: If x^2+12x−k=0, is x=4? [#permalink]
28 Aug 2013, 21:40

Bunuel wrote:

Dmitriy wrote:

Bunuel wrote:

If x^2+12x−k=0, is x=4?

(1) (x+16) is a factor of x^2+12x−k=0, where k is a constant, and x is a variable. This implies that we can factor out \(x+16\) from \(x^2+12x-k=0\), so we would have \((x+16)*(something)=0\). Thus x=-16 is one of the roots of the given quadratic equation.

Viete's theorem states that for the roots \(x_1\) and \(x_2\) of a quadratic equation \(ax^2+bx+c=0\):

\(x_1+x_2=\frac{-b}{a}\) AND \(x_1*x_2=\frac{c}{a}\).

Thus according to the above \(x_1+x_2=-16+x_2=\frac{-12}{1}\) --> \(x_2=4\).

So, we have that x is either -16 or 4. Not sufficient.

(2) x≠−16. Clearly insufficient.

(1)+(2) Since (2) says that x is NOT -16, then x=4. Sufficient.

Answer: C.

Hope it's clear.

Why A is not sufficient? X cannot be -16, as in this case X+16 =0. As I know 0 cannot be a factor or the integer. Pls. explan

Factor of a number and factor of an expression are two different things. For example, both (x+16) and (x-4) are factors of x^2+12x−64=0 --> (x+16)(x-4)=0.

Hope this helps.

Thanks. I didnt know about factors of an expression.

Re: If x^2+12x−k=0, is x=4? [#permalink]
09 Sep 2014, 06:28

Hello from the GMAT Club BumpBot!

Thanks to another GMAT Club member, I have just discovered this valuable topic, yet it had no discussion for over a year. I am now bumping it up - doing my job. I think you may find it valuable (esp those replies with Kudos).

Want to see all other topics I dig out? Follow me (click follow button on profile). You will receive a summary of all topics I bump in your profile area as well as via email. _________________

Type of Visa: You will be applying for a Non-Immigrant F-1 (Student) US Visa. Applying for a Visa: Create an account on: https://cgifederal.secure.force.com/?language=Englishcountry=India Complete...

I started running back in 2005. I finally conquered what seemed impossible. Not sure when I would be able to do full marathon, but this will do for now...