Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.
Customized for You
we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Track Your Progress
every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance
Practice Pays
we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Thank you for using the timer!
We noticed you are actually not timing your practice. Click the START button first next time you use the timer.
There are many benefits to timing your practice, including:
In this GMAT experience talk show, we talk to Tavishi, a young MBA aspirant from India who recently scored 725 in her latest GMAT Focus exam. It’s a 99.9 percentile score on the new GMAT Focus edition and she achieved this feat in her first GMAT attempt.
The Focus Edition allows barely 2 minutes per question. Hence, rereading portions of passages is not an option. Learn our Involved and Evolved reading strategy, the most efficacious solution to time saving on RC and score high on GMAT Verbal!
Ready to conquer GMAT's toughest Data Insights questions? Unlock the secrets of Graphical Interpretation & Two-Part Analysis with our expert-led webinar! Limited seats!
Register for the GMAT Club Virtual MBA Spotlight fair, the biggest MBA fair of the year. You will have a chance to hear Admissions directors from almost every Top 20 program speak, network with peers, and more.
Magoosh students get into top business schools like MIT Sloan, HBS, Stanford GSB, Wharton and more! See why over 6 million students trust us for exam prep.
A study made by a psychologist shows that spending too much
[#permalink]
03 Sep 2010, 11:43
Show timer
00:00
A
B
C
D
E
Difficulty:
35%
(medium)
Question Stats:
93%
(01:09)
correct
7%
(03:06)
wrong
based on 15
sessions
HideShow
DIFFICULTY AND TIMER STATISTICS
A study made by a psychologist shows that spending too much time in front of a computer causes insomnia. Two groups of adults took part in this study. During the study the first group spent 3 hours or less per day working on a computer; the second group spent 6 hours or more working on a computer. A greater proportion of the second group had trouble falling asleep during the period of the study than members from the first group.
Which of the following, if true of the adults in the study, most challenges the psychologist’s conclusion?
a) Some adults who spent more than 6 hours per day working on a computer had fewer problems falling asleep than others in the same group.
b) Some adults who spent 3 hours per day working on a computer did not have problems falling asleep.
c) Some adults voluntarily stopped spending too much time in front of a computer after the study.
d) Some adults spent time working on the computer without any breaks, while others took frequent breaks.
e) Many of the adults in the second group had problems falling asleep before the study began.
Archived Topic
Hi there,
This topic has been closed and archived due to inactivity or violation of community quality standards. No more replies are possible here.
Still interested in this question? Check out the "Best Topics" block below for a better discussion on this exact question, as well as several more related questions.
Re: A study made by a psychologist shows that spending too much
[#permalink]
04 Sep 2010, 00:16
First, reading the stem we know that this is a weaken type question. So think of some possible ways for the conclusion of this stimulus to be wrong.
Conclusion: >hours in front of computer >insomnia
Premise: People who spent >6 hours had more problems sleeping.
suyashjhawar wrote:
A study made by a psychologist shows that spending too much time in front of a computer causes insomnia. Two groups of adults took part in this study. During the study the first group spent 3 hours or less per day working on a computer; the second group spent 6 hours or more working on a computer. A greater proportion of the second group had trouble falling asleep during the period of the study than members from the first group.
Which of the following, if true of the adults in the study, most challenges the psychologist’s conclusion?
a) Some adults who spent more than 6 hours per day working on a computer had fewer problems falling asleep than others in the same group - This doesn't negate the conclusion. So irrelevant.
b) Some adults who spent 3 hours per day working on a computer did not have problems falling asleep - This somewhat SUPPORTS the conclusion. Incorrect.
c) Some adults voluntarily stopped spending too much time in front of a computer after the study - This just disapproves the whole point of the study. Not correct.
d) Some adults spent time working on the computer without any breaks, while others took frequent breaks - This MIGHT seem like a correct answer, but do we know anything about how breaks affect sleeping tendencies? No. So incorrect.
e) Many of the adults in the second group had problems falling asleep before the study began. This is the only answer choice that directly talks about addressing a weakness in the structure of the argument. A preexisting condition would certainly render the results of the study useless. Hence correct.
Still interested in this question? Check out the "Best Topics" block above for a better discussion on this exact question, as well as several more related questions.
Thank you for understanding, and happy exploring!
gmatclubot
Re: A study made by a psychologist shows that spending too much [#permalink]
➡️ Olga Chumanskaya, (ex Mercedes-Benz and currently Chief of Staff at Khosla Ventures) talks about her MBA experience and the transformation an MBA from Stanford Graduate School of Business brought in her life and career.