Bakewey wrote:
sp00ked wrote:
Anyone have any thoughts on the disproportionate number of part-time students to full-time? From my research and personal experience, most part-time students are admitted without an interview and their GMAT stats are much lower than for the full-time program. Speaking to people even here in Minnesota, that really dilutes the Carlson brand since no one really knows if you are from the Full time or part-time program. I believe Carlson has 200 full-time students and more than a 1000 part-time. I have a friend who got 550 on his GMAT and was accepted to Carlson part-time w/o an interview.
I have discussed this point with a few current and former full time students. Here is what I've heard...
1. Is your friend currently working for a company that has a lot of involvement with Carlson? Is his/her MBA being paid for? Supposedly there is a little bit of "if you scratch my back, I'll scratch yours" with Carlson. In essence, Carlson enrolls part-time student from brand name companies, which leads to increased internship/employment opportunities for full-time students. This is at least according to current/past students.
2. For what it's worth, part time and full time programs have limited interaction. Part Time programs also do not play into rankings.
3. From what I've also been told, the disproportionate number of part time students also increases the scholarship opportunities for full time students. So yay for that?
Any other Round 2 applicants? I wonder when decisions will come out.
Living in Minneapolis, I have many friends who are alumni, current students or just employers who have a strong opinion of Carlson graduates. While it does have a strong brand name here, I've spoken even to alumni who have not had great things to say about Carlson.
The main issue for me is that there is no distinction between part-time and full-time graduates, with most prospective employers not asking or not even knowing that there is a difference between the 2 programs in terms of student quality.
While this is true for more programs, even prestigious ones like Kellogg, the fact that Carlson has such a disproportionately large number of part-time students who are able to gain entry into the program with much lower stats bring down the reputation of Carlson graduates more than they do at other MBA programs.
I do like Carlson in terms of the set up and diversity of students, and also the fact that I will not have to move which is a big factor for me. But this is the most significant drawback by far for me and I just hope that people are aware of it.
My guess is that they are trying to game the system in a way by keeping the enrollment small in the full-time program to raise their stats and move up the rankings since all the rankings are based on the full-time stats. But on the flipside, they are enrolling many more people into the part-time program, probably for financial and social reasons.