Find all School-related info fast with the new School-Specific MBA Forum

It is currently 23 Nov 2014, 04:26

Close

GMAT Club Daily Prep

Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.

Events & Promotions

Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

Some species of Arctic birds are threatened by recent sharp

  Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  
Author Message
TAGS:
4 KUDOS received
Director
Director
avatar
Joined: 23 Jun 2005
Posts: 847
GMAT 1: 740 Q48 V42
Followers: 5

Kudos [?]: 26 [4] , given: 1

Re: CR17-11 [#permalink] New post 23 Oct 2006, 04:25
4
This post received
KUDOS
Clear B

A.Hunting limits for snow geese were imposed many years ago in response to a sharp decline in the population of snow geese.
- supports the argument

B.It has been many years since the restriction led to the hunting season for snow geese being closed earlier than the scheduled date.
- hunters normally do not hunt more than 5% of the population. So, removing the restriction is not going to increase the number of snow geese hunted during winter. WEAKENS the argument.

C.The number of snow geese taken by hunters each year has grown every year for several years.
- we already know that population is increasing, so number of birds constituting 5% will also have increased. Does not add anything.

D.As their population has increased, snow geese have recolonized wintering grounds that they had not used for several seasons.
- irrelevant.

E.In the snow goose’s winter habitats, the goose faces no significant natural predation.
- irrelevant.
SVP
SVP
User avatar
Joined: 03 Jan 2005
Posts: 2251
Followers: 13

Kudos [?]: 206 [0], given: 0

Re: CR17-11 [#permalink] New post 23 Oct 2006, 09:48
Yes this one doesn't seem to be very straight forward at all ...

jerrywu wrote:
Some species of Arctic birds are threatened by recent sharp increases in the population of snow geese, which breed in the Arctic and are displacing birds of less vigorous species. Although snow geese are a popular quarry for hunters in the southern regions where they winter, the hunting season ends if and when hunting has reduced the population by five percent, according to official estimates. Clearly, dropping this restriction would allow the other species to recover.

Fact: Snow geese has sharp increase in population and thus threaten the other birds.
Fact: Hunting for snow geese will be over if population is reduced by 5%.
Argument: Dropping the restricition will kill more snow geese thus lessen the threat to other birds.

Ask for weaken.

Quote:
A.Hunting limits for snow geese were imposed many years ago in response to a sharp decline in the population of snow geese.

strenthen.
Quote:
B.It has been many years since the restriction led to the hunting season for snow geese being closed earlier than the scheduled date.

Meaning if we drop the restriction more geese will be killed. Strengthen.
Quote:
C.The number of snow geese taken by hunters each year has grown every year for several years.

Meaning they'll kill even more this year, with the drop of the restriction. Not weaken.
Quote:
D.As their population has increased, snow geese have recolonized wintering grounds that they had not used for several seasons.

This might be it. The restriction is only for the southen region. If the geese are somewhere else then dropping the restriction ma not help.
Quote:
E.In the snow goose’s winter habitats, the goose faces no significant natural predation.

That's why we need to drop the restriction and hunt more geese. Strength.

The only one that sounds plausible is D for me.
_________________

Keep on asking, and it will be given you;
keep on seeking, and you will find;
keep on knocking, and it will be opened to you.

Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 29 Jul 2006
Posts: 92
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 0 [0], given: 0

 [#permalink] New post 29 Oct 2006, 12:05
Am going with B, what is the OA?
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
avatar
Joined: 17 Oct 2006
Posts: 439
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 10 [0], given: 0

 [#permalink] New post 29 Oct 2006, 22:42
I will go for D...OA please
Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 04 May 2006
Posts: 173
Location: paris
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 3 [0], given: 0

 [#permalink] New post 01 Nov 2006, 01:33
Reading again, D is clearly the answer...
:wall
_________________

time is not on my side

Manager
Manager
User avatar
Joined: 04 Oct 2006
Posts: 122
Location: Florida, Argentina, UK
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 2 [0], given: 0

 [#permalink] New post 01 Nov 2006, 05:18
isn't time for the OA already?
1 KUDOS received
VP
VP
avatar
Joined: 15 Jul 2004
Posts: 1474
Schools: Wharton (R2 - submitted); HBS (R2 - submitted); IIMA (admitted for 1 year PGPX)
Followers: 16

Kudos [?]: 106 [1] , given: 13

Re: CR17-11 [#permalink] New post 01 Nov 2006, 05:55
1
This post received
KUDOS
HongHu wrote:
Yes this one doesn't seem to be very straight forward at all ...

jerrywu wrote:
Some species of Arctic birds are threatened by recent sharp increases in the population of snow geese, which breed in the Arctic and are displacing birds of less vigorous species. Although snow geese are a popular quarry for hunters in the southern regions where they winter, the hunting season ends if and when hunting has reduced the population by five percent, according to official estimates. Clearly, dropping this restriction would allow the other species to recover.

Fact: Snow geese has sharp increase in population and thus threaten the other birds.
Fact: Hunting for snow geese will be over if population is reduced by 5%.
Argument: Dropping the restricition will kill more snow geese thus lessen the threat to other birds.

Ask for weaken.

Quote:
A.Hunting limits for snow geese were imposed many years ago in response to a sharp decline in the population of snow geese.

strenthen.
Quote:
B.It has been many years since the restriction led to the hunting season for snow geese being closed earlier than the scheduled date.

Meaning if we drop the restriction more geese will be killed. Strengthen.
Quote:
C.The number of snow geese taken by hunters each year has grown every year for several years.

Meaning they'll kill even more this year, with the drop of the restriction. Not weaken.
Quote:
D.As their population has increased, snow geese have recolonized wintering grounds that they had not used for several seasons.

This might be it. The restriction is only for the southen region. If the geese are somewhere else then dropping the restriction ma not help.
Quote:
E.In the snow goose’s winter habitats, the goose faces no significant natural predation.

That's why we need to drop the restriction and hunt more geese. Strength.

The only one that sounds plausible is D for me.


Excellent explanation Hong Hu. You deserve every bit of the cracking you did at the GMAT. Thanks!
Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 16 Oct 2006
Posts: 167
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 27 [0], given: 0

Some species of Arctic birds are threatened by recent sharp [#permalink] New post 02 Nov 2006, 21:25
Some species of Arctic birds are threatened by recent sharp increases in the population of snow geese, which breed in the Arctic and are displacing birds of less vigorous species. Although snow geese are a popular quarry for hunters in the southern regions where they winter, the hunting season ends if and when hunting has reduced the population by five percent, according to official estimates. Clearly, dropping this restriction would allow the other species to recover.

Which of the following, if true, most seriously undermines the argument?

(A) Hunting limits for snow geese were imposed many years ago in response to a sharp decline in the population of snow geese.
(B) It has been many years since the restriction led to the hunting season for snow geese being closed earlier than the scheduled date.
(C) The number of snow geese taken by hunters each year has grown every year for several years.
(D) As their population has increased, snow geese have recolonized wintering grounds that they had not used for several seasons.
(E) In the snow goose’s winter habitats, the goose faces no significant natural predation.
VP
VP
User avatar
Joined: 25 Jun 2006
Posts: 1176
Followers: 2

Kudos [?]: 51 [0], given: 0

 [#permalink] New post 03 Nov 2006, 00:20
just posted days ago. i for D.
any oA for this question?
Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 15 Jun 2007
Posts: 104
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 12 [0], given: 0

CR geese [#permalink] New post 06 Jul 2007, 18:51
Some species of Arctic birds are threatened by recent sharp increases in the population of snow geese, which breed in the Arctic and are displacing birds of less vigorous species. Although snow geese are a popular quarry for hunters in the southern regions where they winter, the hunting season ends if and when hunting has reduced the population by five percent, according to official estimates. Clearly, dropping this restriction would allow the other species to recover.

Which of the following, if true, most seriously undermines the argument?

A. Hunting limits for snow geese were imposed many years ago in response to a sharp decline in the population of snow geese.
B. It has been many years since the restriction led to the hunting season for snow geese being closed earlier than the scheduled date.
C. The number of snow geese taken by hunters each year has grown every year for several years.
D. As their population has increased, snow geese have re-colonized wintering grounds that they had not used for several seasons.
E. In the snow goose’s winter habitats, the goose faces no significant natural predation.


please explain with details

多谢
Director
Director
User avatar
Joined: 26 Feb 2006
Posts: 907
Followers: 4

Kudos [?]: 44 [0], given: 0

Re: CR geese [#permalink] New post 06 Jul 2007, 22:45
stevegt wrote:
Some species of Arctic birds are threatened by recent sharp increases in the population of snow geese, which breed in the Arctic and are displacing birds of less vigorous species. Although snow geese are a popular quarry for hunters in the southern regions where they winter, the hunting season ends if and when hunting has reduced the population by five percent, according to official estimates. Clearly, dropping this restriction would allow the other species to recover.

Which of the following, if true, most seriously undermines the argument?

A. Hunting limits for snow geese were imposed many years ago in response to a sharp decline in the population of snow geese.
B. It has been many years since the restriction led to the hunting season for snow geese being closed earlier than the scheduled date.
C. The number of snow geese taken by hunters each year has grown every year for several years.
D. As their population has increased, snow geese have re-colonized wintering grounds that they had not used for several seasons.
E. In the snow goose’s winter habitats, the goose faces no significant natural predation.


please explain with details

多谢



choose D.
Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 24 Jun 2006
Posts: 130
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 1 [0], given: 0

Reviews Badge
 [#permalink] New post 07 Jul 2007, 02:38
go for D

experience has shown that if goose population increase then they recolonazie wintering grounds they have not used.
we can conclude that if hunting cease then gooses will spread and endanger other species.
Director
Director
avatar
Joined: 29 Jul 2006
Posts: 877
Followers: 3

Kudos [?]: 16 [0], given: 0

 [#permalink] New post 07 Jul 2007, 06:10
D it is.
The argument says that allowing hunters to kill more geese would help the other species but D says that the population of geese has spread into new areas where hunting is less probable.
Director
Director
User avatar
Joined: 14 Jan 2007
Posts: 782
Followers: 2

Kudos [?]: 63 [0], given: 0

 [#permalink] New post 07 Jul 2007, 06:30
It should be 'D'.

We have to prove that removing the limitations on hunting will NOT reduce the population of geese.
D explains best. If geese starts recolonizing the areas, which hunters were not using, less number of geese will be hunted.
6 KUDOS received
Math Forum Moderator
avatar
Joined: 20 Dec 2010
Posts: 2037
Followers: 128

Kudos [?]: 984 [6] , given: 376

Re: Some species of Arctic birds are threatened by recent sharp [#permalink] New post 19 Oct 2011, 06:08
6
This post received
KUDOS
antiant wrote:
Some species of Arctic birds are threatened by recent sharp increases in the population of snow geese, which breed in the Arctic and are displacing birds of less vigorous species. Although snow geese are a popular quarry for hunters in the southern regions where they winter, the hunting season ends if and when hunting has reduced the population by five percent, according to official estimates. Clearly, dropping this restriction would allow the other species to recover.

Which of the following, if true, most seriously undermines the argument?

(A) Hunting limits for snow geese were imposed many years ago in response to a sharp decline in the population of snow geese.
(B) It has been many years since the restriction led to the hunting season for snow geese being closed earlier than the scheduled date.
(C) The number of snow geese taken by hunters each year has grown every year for several years.
(D) As their population has increased, snow geese have recolonized wintering grounds that they had not used for several seasons.
(E) In the snow goose’s winter habitats, the goose faces no significant natural predation.


Good question.

"B" tells us that the hunters are not able to hunt even 5% of the snow geese population before the hunting season. Thus, lowering the restriction, or in other words, increasing the percent decrease to any value greater than 5 won't help at all.

Scenario:
100000- Snow geese available
Hunting restriction says: Can't hunt more than 5% of 100000 i.e. 5000 in the hunting season.
Fact: Hunters are not able to reach 5000 target by the close of the hunting season.

Argument: Increase the maximum number of geese that could be hunted to a value greater than 5%, say 10%. Even if the law allows the hunter to hunt 10,000 geese, it wouldn't do any good. If the hunters are not able to reach 5000 hunting target, they will definitely not reach 10,000 target. Thus, "B" undermines the argument/suggestion.

Ans: "B"
_________________

~fluke

Take a Survey about GMAT Prep - Win Prizes!

Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 17 Oct 2011
Posts: 241
Location: United States
Concentration: Strategy, Marketing
GMAT 1: 720 Q51 V36
Followers: 4

Kudos [?]: 76 [0], given: 36

Re: Some species of Arctic birds are threatened by recent sharp [#permalink] New post 19 Oct 2011, 07:05
antiant wrote:
Some species of Arctic birds are threatened by recent sharp increases in the population of snow geese, which breed in the Arctic and are displacing birds of less vigorous species. Although snow geese are a popular quarry for hunters in the southern regions where they winter, the hunting season ends if and when hunting has reduced the population by five percent, according to official estimates. Clearly, dropping this restriction would allow the other species to recover.

Which of the following, if true, most seriously undermines the argument?

(A) Hunting limits for snow geese were imposed many years ago in response to a sharp decline in the population of snow geese.
(B) It has been many years since the restriction led to the hunting season for snow geese being closed earlier than the scheduled date.
(C) The number of snow geese taken by hunters each year has grown every year for several years.
(D) As their population has increased, snow geese have recolonized wintering grounds that they had not used for several seasons.
(E) In the snow goose’s winter habitats, the goose faces no significant natural predation.



I went with B. Here is my explanation -

The argument is that the 5% restriction needs to be dropped in order for people to be able to hunt more geese, thus reducing their population. If for the last several years that 5% limit has never been reached, that means hunters aren't able to kill enough geese within the full hunting season (because the population now is so large), dropping the restriction would have no effect to the population.

Hope this helps.
_________________

http://sanjuro9.tumblr.com

1 KUDOS received
Current Student
avatar
Joined: 18 Jun 2010
Posts: 150
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 15 [1] , given: 2

Re: Some species of Arctic birds are threatened by recent sharp [#permalink] New post 23 Oct 2011, 03:13
1
This post received
KUDOS
+1 for B. Real good question.

Come to think of it, D at best will strengthen the argument. If new birds have colonized other places than where they usually winter, it should encourage government to lift the restriction on hunting limit to ensure other species' survival rate goes up.
Intern
Intern
avatar
Joined: 13 Jul 2011
Posts: 46
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 0 [0], given: 8

Re: Some species of Arctic birds are threatened by recent sharp [#permalink] New post 23 Oct 2011, 08:30
B
Manager
Manager
avatar
Status: Bell the GMAT!!!
Affiliations: Aidha
Joined: 16 Aug 2011
Posts: 186
Location: Singapore
Concentration: Finance, General Management
GMAT 1: 680 Q46 V37
GMAT 2: 620 Q49 V27
GMAT 3: 700 Q49 V36
WE: Other (Other)
Followers: 5

Kudos [?]: 40 [0], given: 43

Re: Some species of Arctic birds are threatened by recent sharp [#permalink] New post 19 Nov 2011, 13:14
fluke wrote:
antiant wrote:
Some species of Arctic birds are threatened by recent sharp increases in the population of snow geese, which breed in the Arctic and are displacing birds of less vigorous species. Although snow geese are a popular quarry for hunters in the southern regions where they winter, the hunting season ends if and when hunting has reduced the population by five percent, according to official estimates. Clearly, dropping this restriction would allow the other species to recover.

Which of the following, if true, most seriously undermines the argument?

(A) Hunting limits for snow geese were imposed many years ago in response to a sharp decline in the population of snow geese.
(B) It has been many years since the restriction led to the hunting season for snow geese being closed earlier than the scheduled date.
(C) The number of snow geese taken by hunters each year has grown every year for several years.
(D) As their population has increased, snow geese have recolonized wintering grounds that they had not used for several seasons.
(E) In the snow goose’s winter habitats, the goose faces no significant natural predation.


Good question.

"B" tells us that the hunters are not able to hunt even 5% of the snow geese population before the hunting season. Thus, lowering the restriction, or in other words, increasing the percent decrease to any value greater than 5 won't help at all.

Scenario:
100000- Snow geese available
Hunting restriction says: Can't hunt more than 5% of 100000 i.e. 5000 in the hunting season.
Fact: Hunters are not able to reach 5000 target by the close of the hunting season.

Argument: Increase the maximum number of geese that could be hunted to a value greater than 5%, say 10%. Even if the law allows the hunter to hunt 10,000 geese, it wouldn't do any good. If the hunters are not able to reach 5000 hunting target, they will definitely not reach 10,000 target. Thus, "B" undermines the argument/suggestion.

Ans: "B"


In my opinion, B may also infer that hunters are able to hunt till the restricted numbers before the scheduled date. What are your thoughts on the same.
_________________

If my post did a dance in your mind, send me the steps through kudos :)

My MBA journey at http://mbadilemma.wordpress.com/

1 KUDOS received
Intern
Intern
avatar
Joined: 27 Jan 2011
Posts: 28
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 4 [1] , given: 0

Re: Some species of Arctic birds are threatened by recent sharp [#permalink] New post 23 Nov 2011, 12:40
1
This post received
KUDOS
GMATmission wrote:
fluke wrote:
antiant wrote:
Some species of Arctic birds are threatened by recent sharp increases in the population of snow geese, which breed in the Arctic and are displacing birds of less vigorous species. Although snow geese are a popular quarry for hunters in the southern regions where they winter, the hunting season ends if and when hunting has reduced the population by five percent, according to official estimates. Clearly, dropping this restriction would allow the other species to recover.

Which of the following, if true, most seriously undermines the argument?

(A) Hunting limits for snow geese were imposed many years ago in response to a sharp decline in the population of snow geese.
(B) It has been many years since the restriction led to the hunting season for snow geese being closed earlier than the scheduled date.(C) The number of snow geese taken by hunters each year has grown every year for several years.
(D) As their population has increased, snow geese have recolonized wintering grounds that they had not used for several seasons.
(E) In the snow goose’s winter habitats, the goose faces no significant natural predation.


Good question.

"B" tells us that the hunters are not able to hunt even 5% of the snow geese population before the hunting season. Thus, lowering the restriction, or in other words, increasing the percent decrease to any value greater than 5 won't help at all.

Scenario:
100000- Snow geese available
Hunting restriction says: Can't hunt more than 5% of 100000 i.e. 5000 in the hunting season.
Fact: Hunters are not able to reach 5000 target by the close of the hunting season.

Argument: Increase the maximum number of geese that could be hunted to a value greater than 5%, say 10%. Even if the law allows the hunter to hunt 10,000 geese, it wouldn't do any good. If the hunters are not able to reach 5000 hunting target, they will definitely not reach 10,000 target. Thus, "B" undermines the argument/suggestion.

Ans: "B"


In my opinion, B may also infer that hunters are able to hunt till the restricted numbers before the scheduled date. What are your thoughts on the same.



"B" is the right answer because it undermines the argument which states that if more snow geese are hunted, the threat of displacement for the other species is lowered.
Re: Some species of Arctic birds are threatened by recent sharp   [#permalink] 23 Nov 2011, 12:40
    Similar topics Author Replies Last post
Similar
Topics:
The gyrfalcon, an Arctic bird of prey, has survived a close az780 2 17 Feb 2008, 22:20
The gyrfalcon, an Arctic bird of prey, has survived a close GMAThopeful 2 05 Mar 2007, 02:36
The gyrfalcon, an Arctic bird of prey, has survived a close iced_tea 8 23 Jun 2006, 08:55
The gyrfalcon, an Arctic bird of prey, has survived a close willget800 1 02 Apr 2006, 12:26
3 The gyrfalcon, an arctic bird of prey, has survived a close qhoc0010 7 21 Jan 2005, 07:43
Display posts from previous: Sort by

Some species of Arctic birds are threatened by recent sharp

  Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  

Go to page   Previous    1   2   3   4    Next  [ 71 posts ] 



GMAT Club MBA Forum Home| About| Privacy Policy| Terms and Conditions| GMAT Club Rules| Contact| Sitemap

Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group and phpBB SEO

Kindly note that the GMAT® test is a registered trademark of the Graduate Management Admission Council®, and this site has neither been reviewed nor endorsed by GMAC®.