The excessive number of safety regulations that the federal : GMAT Critical Reasoning (CR)
Check GMAT Club Decision Tracker for the Latest School Decision Releases http://gmatclub.com/AppTrack

 It is currently 19 Jan 2017, 05:39

# LIVE NOW:

Chat with Admission Manager and Current Student of NUS SIngapore - Join Chat Room to Participate.

### GMAT Club Daily Prep

#### Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

# Events & Promotions

###### Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

# The excessive number of safety regulations that the federal

Author Message
TAGS:

### Hide Tags

Manager
Joined: 22 Apr 2003
Posts: 179
Followers: 2

Kudos [?]: 43 [0], given: 0

The excessive number of safety regulations that the federal [#permalink]

### Show Tags

21 May 2003, 01:40
00:00

Difficulty:

(N/A)

Question Stats:

100% (02:37) correct 0% (00:00) wrong based on 0 sessions

### HideShow timer Statistics

The excessive number of safety regulations that the federal government has placed on industry poses more serious hardships for big businesses than for small ones. Since large commpanies do everything on a more massive scale, they must alter more cpmplex operations and spend much more money to meet governmental requirements.

whihc of the following, if true, would most weaken the argument above?

A. Small companies are less likely than large companies to have the capital reserves for improvements
B.The operations of small companies frequently rely on the same technonlgies as the operations of large companies.
C. Safety regulation codes are uniform, established without reference to size of company.
D. Large companies typically have more of their profits invested in other businesses than do small companies.
E.Large companies are in general more likely than small companies to diversily their markets and products.
If you have any questions
New!
SVP
Joined: 03 Feb 2003
Posts: 1603
Followers: 8

Kudos [?]: 245 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

21 May 2003, 03:04
Manager
Joined: 22 Apr 2003
Posts: 179
Followers: 2

Kudos [?]: 43 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

21 May 2003, 03:19
brstorewala wrote:
I would go with A

Bingo!
But, I don't understand why it is A?
I like to choose C.
From this question, could you cite the assumption and evidence to
solving this question about "weaken" problem?
Manager
Joined: 28 Feb 2003
Posts: 100
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 8 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

21 May 2003, 04:56
poses more serious hardships for big businesses than for small ones

spend much more money to meet governmental requirements.

We have to concentrate on that choice which weakens the argument above. Choice A tell us that because small companies have limited capital at their disposal, and therefore even they would face hardships and it is not necessary that the big companies will face more hardships.
SVP
Joined: 03 Feb 2003
Posts: 1603
Followers: 8

Kudos [?]: 245 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

21 May 2003, 05:02
IMHO: B seems to be not bad as well. If small companies use the same technologies (scale does not matter!) as do big ones, then it is reasonable to suppose that both have the same expences.

But... A is stronger, I have to agree.
Manager
Joined: 22 Apr 2003
Posts: 179
Followers: 2

Kudos [?]: 43 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

21 May 2003, 06:00
brstorewala wrote:
poses more serious hardships for big businesses than for small ones

spend much more money to meet governmental requirements.

We have to concentrate on that choice which weakens the argument above. Choice A tell us that because small companies have limited capital at their disposal, and therefore even they would face hardships and it is not necessary that the big companies will face more hardships.

Aha.....
Thank you, brstorewala.

Chihao
Manager
Joined: 01 Sep 2003
Posts: 73
Location: NYC
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 1 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

13 Dec 2003, 08:42
The way I see it, the "harships" are the finanical/economic upgrades. Thus since the small companies do not have the money/ reserve of the upgrades, they are probably in a worse position than the bigger companies.
Senior Manager
Joined: 12 Oct 2003
Posts: 261
Location: sydney
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 20 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

13 Dec 2003, 15:45
see the conclusion here is

Colclusion = "The excessive number of safety regulations that the federal government has placed on industry poses more serious hardships for big businesses than for small ones" ,

Primise = second sentence.

right??? so u have to weaken the conclusion. A only talks abt small companies. but B talks abt both small and big companies.
do why not B?
_________________

When u r about to make ends meet, someone moves the ends.

Intern
Joined: 05 Aug 2014
Posts: 10
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 0 [0], given: 0

Re: The excessive number of safety regulations that the federal [#permalink]

### Show Tags

14 Apr 2016, 03:26
I'm leaning more towards A, but i'm not sure.
Re: The excessive number of safety regulations that the federal   [#permalink] 14 Apr 2016, 03:26
Similar topics Replies Last post
Similar
Topics:
37 The excessive number of safety regulations that the federal 19 29 Feb 2012, 14:15
Federal regulations require that corporations use separate 13 02 Aug 2009, 11:19
Federal regulations require that corporations use separate 10 19 Nov 2008, 10:45
43 Federal regulations require that corporations use separate 51 16 Aug 2008, 06:10
The excessive number of safety regulations that the federal 8 15 Aug 2007, 16:43
Display posts from previous: Sort by