Last visit was: 14 May 2024, 13:17 It is currently 14 May 2024, 13:17

Close
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Close
Request Expert Reply
Confirm Cancel
User avatar
Manager
Manager
Joined: 31 Dec 2003
Posts: 171
Own Kudos [?]: 302 [0]
Given Kudos: 0
Location: US
Send PM
User avatar
CEO
CEO
Joined: 15 Dec 2003
Posts: 2709
Own Kudos [?]: 1542 [0]
Given Kudos: 0
Send PM
User avatar
Director
Director
Joined: 16 Jun 2004
Posts: 510
Own Kudos [?]: 159 [0]
Given Kudos: 0
Send PM
User avatar
Manager
Manager
Joined: 31 Dec 2003
Posts: 171
Own Kudos [?]: 302 [0]
Given Kudos: 0
Location: US
Send PM
Re: Although severely damaged by the collision and already [#permalink]
C is the OA.
Can anyone explain why in option B -
Although it had been severely damaged by the collision and was already sinking,the coast guard arrived at the freighter in time to save the crew.
the pronoun 'it ' is a pronoun reference error. Doesn't hte 'it' clearly refer to the freighter.
User avatar
CEO
CEO
Joined: 15 Dec 2003
Posts: 2709
Own Kudos [?]: 1542 [0]
Given Kudos: 0
Send PM
Re: Although severely damaged by the collision and already [#permalink]
Although it had been severely damaged by the collision and was already sinking, the coast guard [...]
"it" does not properly refers to freighter. The first half is an introductory modifier and modifies the noun that immediately follows the comma.
User avatar
Manager
Manager
Joined: 31 Dec 2003
Posts: 171
Own Kudos [?]: 302 [0]
Given Kudos: 0
Location: US
Send PM
Re: Although severely damaged by the collision and already [#permalink]
Paul,
This is my understanding of misplaced modifiers.
When a sentence begins with a phrase, that phrase is supposed to modify the noun or the pronoun that immediately follows the phrase. Otherwise its a misplaced modifier.
There are two ways to correct this.
1. Place the noun or pronoun immediately after the phrase.
2. Change the phrase to a clause by introducing a subject so that it is no longer necessary for the first half of the sentence to modify the noun following it.

Eg from Princeton Review -
Although it is not quite as liquid an investment as a money-market account, financial experts recommend a certificate of deposit for its high yield.
In the above sentence, 'it' clearly refers to the certificate of deposit and not to the financial experts.

So why then do we say that the 'it' in our example doesn't have a clear referrent.
Thanks.
User avatar
CEO
CEO
Joined: 15 Dec 2003
Posts: 2709
Own Kudos [?]: 1542 [0]
Given Kudos: 0
Send PM
Re: Although severely damaged by the collision and already [#permalink]
In your given example, "it" refers to certificate of deposit because it is the only singular noun following the introductory modifier. However, I do not like that sentence since the modifier does not immediately modifies the noun following the clause.
User avatar
Manager
Manager
Joined: 28 Jul 2004
Posts: 111
Own Kudos [?]: 132 [0]
Given Kudos: 0
Send PM
Re: Although severely damaged by the collision and already [#permalink]
My choice is B
Correct me if my understanding is not right.

'Damaged by' seems to be a better usage when stating the cause of damage. 'Damage in' seems to fit well when the time factor comes into play.
User avatar
Director
Director
Joined: 13 Nov 2003
Posts: 558
Own Kudos [?]: 988 [0]
Given Kudos: 0
Location: Florida
Send PM
Re: Although severely damaged by the collision and already [#permalink]
krish wrote:
My choice is B
Correct me if my understanding is not right.
'Damaged by' seems to be a better usage when stating the cause of damage. 'Damage in' seems to fit well when the time factor comes into play.


Both are right, but differs in context they should be used.

it all depends on the subect in question. when two or more elements are mutually involved in something, we use "damaged in".
--> Iraqi Islamic shrine damaged in attack.
--> Nuclear missile damaged in submarine base mishap.

and when the subject itself is causing the action (one sided) then we use "damaged by"
--> shops damaged by the vandals.
--> a mind damaged by addiction.
--> Notes on Emergency Drying of Coated Papers Damaged by Water
User avatar
SVP
SVP
Joined: 07 Jul 2004
Posts: 2003
Own Kudos [?]: 1903 [0]
Given Kudos: 0
Location: Singapore
Send PM
Re: Although severely damaged by the collision and already [#permalink]
(C) it is ! The sentence should begin with naming the freighter as the pronoun 'it' could has no antecedent noun. (D) is out as it was also already sinking is unescessary.



Archived Topic
Hi there,
This topic has been closed and archived due to inactivity or violation of community quality standards. No more replies are possible here.
Where to now? Join ongoing discussions on thousands of quality questions in our Sentence Correction (EA only) Forum
Still interested in this question? Check out the "Best Topics" block above for a better discussion on this exact question, as well as several more related questions.
Thank you for understanding, and happy exploring!
GMAT Club Bot
Re: Although severely damaged by the collision and already [#permalink]
Moderators:
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
6927 posts
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
238 posts
Current Student
278 posts

Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group | Emoji artwork provided by EmojiOne