Last visit was: 26 Apr 2024, 18:00 It is currently 26 Apr 2024, 18:00

Close
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Close
Request Expert Reply
Confirm Cancel
User avatar
Director
Director
Joined: 17 Jun 2008
Posts: 617
Own Kudos [?]: 2902 [0]
Given Kudos: 0
Send PM
User avatar
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
Joined: 20 Sep 2006
Posts: 477
Own Kudos [?]: 299 [0]
Given Kudos: 7
Send PM
User avatar
Director
Director
Joined: 17 Jun 2008
Posts: 617
Own Kudos [?]: 2902 [0]
Given Kudos: 0
Send PM
User avatar
Director
Director
Joined: 17 Jun 2008
Posts: 617
Own Kudos [?]: 2902 [0]
Given Kudos: 0
Send PM
Re: At a time when narrowly won presidential elections seem more [#permalink]
spriya wrote:
rao_1857 wrote:
spriya wrote:
At a time when narrowly won presidential elections seem more the rule than the exception, the proliferation of small third parties would have a bargaining power that few of them have ever enjoyed before.
(A) the proliferation of small third parties would have
(B) the number of small third parties would have
(C) the existence of small third parties has
(D) the proliferation of small third parties has
(E) small third parties have <-- This is the only choice with plural subject and correct verb!!!


"Few ot them" in the non underlined part suggests that we need a plural subject. Only ANS choice E has a plural subject.



Good explanation!!!

i just marked B,
the number is singular .Missed this point!!

Yes OA is E


One query ,usage of would have seemed correct to me here than HAVE.kindly any suggestions!!
User avatar
Director
Director
Joined: 17 Jun 2008
Posts: 614
Own Kudos [?]: 444 [0]
Given Kudos: 0
Send PM
Re: At a time when narrowly won presidential elections seem more [#permalink]
[quote="spriyaOne query ,usage of would have seemed correct to me here than HAVE.kindly any suggestions!![/quote]


"would have" is used in the main clause and this does not seem right.
User avatar
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
Joined: 20 Sep 2006
Posts: 477
Own Kudos [?]: 299 [0]
Given Kudos: 7
Send PM
Re: At a time when narrowly won presidential elections seem more [#permalink]
spriya wrote:
spriya wrote:
rao_1857 wrote:
At a time when narrowly won presidential elections seem more the rule than the exception, the proliferation of small third parties would have a bargaining power that few of them have ever enjoyed before.
(A) the proliferation of small third parties would have
(B) the number of small third parties would have
(C) the existence of small third parties has
(D) the proliferation of small third parties has
(E) small third parties have <-- This is the only choice with plural subject and correct verb!!!


"Few ot them" in the non underlined part suggests that we need a plural subject. Only ANS choice E has a plural subject.



Good explanation!!!

i just marked B,
the number is singular .Missed this point!!

Yes OA is E

One query ,usage of would have seemed correct to me here than HAVE.kindly any suggestions!!


Yeupp I agree with you.... "would have" is better ...but the thing is its the singular subject that is the problem in this cohice. It the ans choice whould have been like this: "A number of small third parties would have" then I would have difinetely gone with this one!

A number of --> Plural
The number of --> Singular
User avatar
Director
Director
Joined: 17 Jun 2008
Posts: 617
Own Kudos [?]: 2902 [0]
Given Kudos: 0
Send PM
Re: At a time when narrowly won presidential elections seem more [#permalink]
spriya wrote:
spriya wrote:
rao_1857 wrote:
At a time when narrowly won presidential elections seem more the rule than the exception, the proliferation of small third parties would have a bargaining power that few of them have ever enjoyed before.
(A) the proliferation of small third parties would have
(B) the number of small third parties would have
(C) the existence of small third parties has
(D) the proliferation of small third parties has
(E) small third parties have Plural
The number of --> Singular

This is apt .Actually plural is required because of few of them
Thanks



Archived Topic
Hi there,
This topic has been closed and archived due to inactivity or violation of community quality standards. No more replies are possible here.
Where to now? Join ongoing discussions on thousands of quality questions in our Sentence Correction (EA only) Forum
Still interested in this question? Check out the "Best Topics" block above for a better discussion on this exact question, as well as several more related questions.
Thank you for understanding, and happy exploring!
GMAT Club Bot
Re: At a time when narrowly won presidential elections seem more [#permalink]
Moderators:
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
6923 posts
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
238 posts
Current Student
278 posts

Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group | Emoji artwork provided by EmojiOne