|
Author |
Message |
|
TAGS:
|
|
|
Intern
Joined: 31 Jan 2006
Posts: 33
Location: Los Angeles
Followers: 0
Kudos [?]:
0
[0], given: 0
|
CR from ETS code 55 [#permalink]
 12 Feb 2006, 21:47
Question Stats:
100% (03:21) correct
0% (00:00) wrong based on 0 sessions
In theory, Paupua New Guinea could be a substantial exporter of tropical crops. In actuality, it is not. THe reason is that 97% of all land is owned by clans and cannot be bought or sold by individuals, and thus the kinds of realignment of properties that would be necessary to acheive maximum production for export have been impossible to achieve.
The answer to which of the following questions would be most relevant to evaluating the adequacy of the explanation given above?
a) Who owns the 3% of the land in Paupua New Guinea that is not owned by clans?
b) What percentage of Paupua New Guinea's current produciton of tropical crops is consumed within the country?
c) How much longer is land ownership by clans expected to remain the prevailing cultural pattern in Paupua New Guinea?
d) Which of the tropical crops currently grown in Paupua New Guinea could be exported if there were a surplus for export?
e) How does Paupua New Guinea's current production capacity for tropical crops compare with the maximum capacity that property realignment would make possible?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
VP
Joined: 07 Nov 2005
Posts: 1134
Location: India
Followers: 2
Kudos [?]:
22
[0], given: 1
|
Not sure but is it E
|
|
|
|
|
|
Intern
Joined: 31 Jan 2006
Posts: 33
Location: Los Angeles
Followers: 0
Kudos [?]:
0
[0], given: 0
|
I thought it was C, because knowing when that land would be up for sale could start the process of buying/selling/realigning.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Senior Manager
Joined: 22 Nov 2005
Posts: 483
Followers: 1
Kudos [?]:
3
[0], given: 0
|
I think its E.
Rest of the aswers are way out
|
|
|
|
|
|
Senior Manager
Joined: 11 Jan 2006
Posts: 277
Location: Chennai,India
Followers: 1
Kudos [?]:
3
[0], given: 0
|
no it is E , only in E we are evaluating, the usefulness of the property realingment , or atleast talk abt it.
_________________
vazlkaiye porkalam vazltuthan parkanum.... porkalam maralam porkalthan maruma
|
|
|
|
|
|
Director
Joined: 26 Sep 2005
Posts: 588
Location: Munich,Germany
Followers: 1
Kudos [?]:
7
[0], given: 0
|
agree its E. It talks about production capacity, it seeks to answer whether post realignment of land will boost production.
|
|
|
|
|
|
VP
Joined: 20 Sep 2005
Posts: 1023
Followers: 3
Kudos [?]:
23
[0], given: 0
|
E is best.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Director
Joined: 10 Oct 2005
Posts: 732
Location: Madrid
Followers: 3
Kudos [?]:
10
[0], given: 0
|
go E go
_________________
IE IMBA 2010
|
|
|
|
|
|
Manager
Joined: 18 Dec 2005
Posts: 77
Followers: 1
Kudos [?]:
0
[0], given: 0
|
Vote for E.
B is close, but E is way better.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Intern
Joined: 24 Jan 2006
Posts: 15
Followers: 0
Kudos [?]:
0
[0], given: 0
|
I'll go with E .the answer to E will provide the adequate information about the realignment property which was disussed in the passage.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current Student
Joined: 29 Jan 2005
Posts: 5289
Followers: 17
Kudos [?]:
91
[0], given: 0
|
Choose (E) and click confirm.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Manager
Joined: 27 Jan 2006
Posts: 104
Location: Barcelona
Followers: 1
Kudos [?]:
0
[0], given: 0
|
E.
The reasoning in the question stem talks about export of tropical fruits as a function of land holding patterns optimal for maximizing production.
_________________
...................................................................
reloading NEURON JELLY to reach another galaxy.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Moderators:
metallicafan, rajeevrks27, souvik101990, PTK, MacFauz, noboru, kissthegmat, carcass, willigetmylifeback, mikemcgarry, doe007, Vercules, Legendaddy, tuanquang269, RaviChandra, Marcab, Narenn
|
close
