CR- MASS TRANSIT : GMAT Critical Reasoning (CR)
Check GMAT Club App Tracker for the Latest School Decision Releases http://gmatclub.com/AppTrack

It is currently 10 Dec 2016, 08:19
GMAT Club Tests

Close

GMAT Club Daily Prep

Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.

Close

Request Expert Reply

Events & Promotions

Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

CR- MASS TRANSIT

  new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  
Author Message
TAGS:

Hide Tags

Senior Manager
Senior Manager
avatar
Joined: 11 Nov 2003
Posts: 357
Location: Illinois
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 5 [0], given: 0

CR- MASS TRANSIT [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 06 Aug 2004, 06:37
00:00
A
B
C
D
E

Difficulty:

(N/A)

Question Stats:

0% (00:00) correct 0% (00:00) wrong based on 0 sessions

HideShow timer Statistics

Please explain
Attachments

crimg.jpg
crimg.jpg [ 97.25 KiB | Viewed 987 times ]

Request Expert Reply
If you have any questions
you can ask an expert
New!
GMAT Club Legend
GMAT Club Legend
avatar
Joined: 15 Dec 2003
Posts: 4302
Followers: 39

Kudos [?]: 418 [0], given: 0

 [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 06 Aug 2004, 07:23
It's b/w A and C but I'll go with C
B directly contradicts the statement
D and E just cannot be inferred
C is most conservative answer. Stem says "because the price of gasoline is still not prohibitive, the number of passengers using PT has fallen". This means that at a certain treshold, when gasoline prices are prohibitive, PT passengers will automatically rise. A assumes a directly proportional increase in PT passengers while the function might be one that starts increasing after a certain treshold as said by the stem.
_________________

Best Regards,

Paul

Senior Manager
Senior Manager
avatar
Joined: 11 Nov 2003
Posts: 357
Location: Illinois
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 5 [0], given: 0

 [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 06 Aug 2004, 08:32
Paul wrote:
It's b/w A and C but I'll go with C
B directly contradicts the statement
D and E just cannot be inferred
C is most conservative answer. Stem says "because the price of gasoline is still not prohibitive, the number of passengers using PT has fallen". This means that at a certain treshold, when gasoline prices are prohibitive, PT passengers will automatically rise. A assumes a directly proportional increase in PT passengers while the function might be one that starts increasing after a certain treshold as said by the stem.



But if even if the price of gasoline becomes prohibitive, how can we say for sure that the number of passangers on train will rise? It may be possible that because of the further deterioration in other services on train, the ridership may further decline or it may remain constant. How can we make the price of the gasiline the sole criteria for increase or decrease in the ridership?
GMAT Club Legend
GMAT Club Legend
avatar
Joined: 15 Dec 2003
Posts: 4302
Followers: 39

Kudos [?]: 418 [0], given: 0

 [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 06 Aug 2004, 08:58
It is not the sole criterion which will increase ridership. However, it will be one of them. Hence, if it is one of the factors, holding all other factors constant, it then must increase ridership.

The stem says that, compounded to other reasons, since gas prices did not reach that prohibitive level, ridership has fallen. I believe that we can safely say that if gas prices reach that level, people should switch to public transports and increase its ridership.
_________________

Best Regards,

Paul

SVP
SVP
User avatar
Joined: 16 Oct 2003
Posts: 1810
Followers: 4

Kudos [?]: 132 [0], given: 0

 [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 09 Aug 2004, 08:13
Yes Got C. I had a bad weekend with lots of CR's getting :oops: wrong so I am taking little more time to get back my confidence.
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
avatar
Joined: 25 Jul 2004
Posts: 273
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 10 [0], given: 0

 [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 09 Aug 2004, 12:29
since gas prices have not reached prohibitive levels, mass transport decreasing

MTD -> NOT Gas Reached prohibitive levels

Contrapositive is:

Gas Reaches Prohibitive levels -> NOT MTD (C)
Director
Director
User avatar
Joined: 13 Nov 2003
Posts: 964
Location: Florida
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 118 [0], given: 0

 [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 09 Aug 2004, 17:19
the whole paragraph is based on the fact that:
gas price below prohibitive level --> people will switch to their own transport.

C my choice.
  [#permalink] 09 Aug 2004, 17:19
    Similar topics Author Replies Last post
Similar
Topics:
4 Experts publish their posts in the topic CR ASSUMPTION SERIES: 3) Groverton Mass Transit Authority EMPOWERgmatMax 11 17 Feb 2016, 17:37
5 The public is aware of the possibility of biases in the mass Legendaddy 5 11 Sep 2012, 20:37
2 Banning cigarette advertisements in the mass media will not noboru 21 02 Sep 2009, 13:54
The Transit Authority s proposal to increase fares by 40 marcodonzelli 3 14 Mar 2008, 05:59
3 Sharks have a higher ratio of cartilage mass to body mass ham1231 7 20 Jul 2007, 22:52
Display posts from previous: Sort by

CR- MASS TRANSIT

  new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  


cron

GMAT Club MBA Forum Home| About| Terms and Conditions| GMAT Club Rules| Contact| Sitemap

Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group and phpBB SEO

Kindly note that the GMAT® test is a registered trademark of the Graduate Management Admission Council®, and this site has neither been reviewed nor endorsed by GMAC®.