jallenmorris wrote:
How do the Cracking the GMAT CAT's compare to the real thing? If there is a prior post discussing this, just let me know.
Hi JAllen,
[edit: it seems that I am not talking about the same CAT, but what i say still stands,, don't look too much into it. Even KevinCan got a low score on that test]
------------------------------------------------------------------------
i did the free PR test ages ago (in January). It was about a month before my actual GMAT and I scored 690 in the test (from memory it was a Q45 V41 split). Now there interesting thing was that I only got 4-5 wrong in the quant, which i felt was way too easy, which indicates that their scoring algorithm is flawed to say the least.
I have heard from other clubbers that its a good test to gauge verbal ability (but again their scoring will be flawed) since verbal questions (especially SC) are more inline with what we are used to.
I read your earlier post regaring your experience. If I were you, I'd disregard that score and continue as you are. You seem to be posting some good stuff that indicates you are on the right track!
Use these CATS to get used to 4 hours in that g-chair and pacing etc, but don't dwell too much on scores.
-buff