|
Author |
Message |
|
TAGS:
|
|
|
Intern
Joined: 29 Mar 2004
Posts: 42
Location: Thailand
Followers: 0
Kudos [?]:
0
[0], given: 0
|
Current motion pictures give children a distorted view of [#permalink]
11 Jun 2004, 09:14
Question Stats:
0% (00:00) correct
0% (00:00) wrong based on 0 sessions
Current motion pictures give children a distorted view of the world. Animated features depict animals as loyal friends, compassionate creatures, and tender souls while “ spaghetti Westernsâ€
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
SVP
Joined: 16 Oct 2003
Posts: 1957
Followers: 2
Kudos [?]:
14
[0], given: 0
|
D is my FA
According to me 1 and 2 are irrelevant and 3 makes us believe that the cooperation between humans and animals ends with a moral which proves that humans can be cooperative, and not cruel, not uncaring et cetera. This is a solid rebututtal.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Director
Joined: 01 Feb 2003
Posts: 897
Location: Hyderabad
Followers: 1
Kudos [?]:
9
[0], given: 0
|
I go with A, that is only I
II is definitely out of question, as it states the intent of the producers which in no way attacks the assumption
III was a good probable, but I dismissed because of the word "usually"
If I were true then the conclusion falls apart
|
|
|
|
|
|
Senior Manager
Joined: 25 Dec 2003
Posts: 363
Location: India
Followers: 1
Kudos [?]:
5
[0], given: 0
|
Hi
My answer to this is C. Both statement 1 and 2 diqualify the authors view. Both the statement, does not provide an opportuinity to the children to view animals as better than humans.
Regards
_________________
Giving another SHOT
|
|
|
|
|
|
GMAT Club Legend
Joined: 15 Dec 2003
Posts: 4441
Followers: 10
Kudos [?]:
81
[0], given: 0
|
I'm with A
1) If children cannot watch spaghetti Westerns (whatever that means!), then how can they be taught to value animals more highly than other human beings? This weakens the argument
2) This is a claim that is not substantiated. It's like saying that apples are red because they are red
3) We are not interested about ancient fables, what we want to know is what current motion pictures teach children
Only 1 weakens the argument
_________________
Best Regards,
Paul
|
|
|
|
|
|
Director
Joined: 01 Feb 2003
Posts: 897
Location: Hyderabad
Followers: 1
Kudos [?]:
9
[0], given: 0
|
OA plz
|
|
|
|
|
|
GMAT Club Legend
Joined: 15 Dec 2003
Posts: 4441
Followers: 10
Kudos [?]:
81
[0], given: 0
|
 Give it some time Vithal. This was posted just 20 minutes ago.
_________________
Best Regards,
Paul
|
|
|
|
|
|
SVP
Joined: 16 Oct 2003
Posts: 1957
Followers: 2
Kudos [?]:
14
[0], given: 0
|
I was lost.....forget my post.
Last edited by Bhai on 11 Jun 2004, 10:08, edited 2 times in total.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Director
Joined: 01 Feb 2003
Posts: 897
Location: Hyderabad
Followers: 1
Kudos [?]:
9
[0], given: 0
|
Yep..will wait
|
|
|
|
|
|
Director
Joined: 05 May 2004
Posts: 602
Location: San Jose, CA
Followers: 1
Kudos [?]:
10
[0], given: 0
|
Re: cr--Current motion pictures [#permalink]
11 Jun 2004, 10:52
Another A voter
|
|
|
|
|
|
SVP
Joined: 30 Oct 2003
Posts: 1963
Location: NewJersey USA
Followers: 3
Kudos [?]:
25
[0], given: 0
|
A should be it.
i) if children are not allowed to watch then definitely the movies are not teching children to treat animals better than human beings
ii) so what, intention has nothing to do with the after effect.
iii) This may weaken because to some extent it conveys that humans are better if we assume that moral gives a good picture about human beings
On the other hand we dont know what moral is being taught so we cannot tell for sure.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Intern
Joined: 29 Mar 2004
Posts: 42
Location: Thailand
Followers: 0
Kudos [?]:
0
[0], given: 0
|
yep
OA is A as many people chose it
thank for trying
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Moderators:
metallicafan, rajeevrks27, souvik101990, PTK, MacFauz, noboru, kissthegmat, carcass, willigetmylifeback, mikemcgarry, doe007, Vercules, Legendaddy, tuanquang269, RaviChandra, Marcab, Narenn
|