Last visit was: 26 Apr 2024, 06:37 It is currently 26 Apr 2024, 06:37

Close
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Close
Request Expert Reply
Confirm Cancel
SORT BY:
Kudos
User avatar
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
Joined: 30 Jul 2007
Posts: 385
Own Kudos [?]: 62 [0]
Given Kudos: 5
Location: Europe
Concentration: General Management
Schools:St. Gallen '09
 Q47  V40
Send PM
User avatar
SVP
SVP
Joined: 17 May 2007
Posts: 2437
Own Kudos [?]: 1682 [0]
Given Kudos: 210
Send PM
User avatar
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
Joined: 30 Jul 2007
Posts: 385
Own Kudos [?]: 62 [0]
Given Kudos: 5
Location: Europe
Concentration: General Management
Schools:St. Gallen '09
 Q47  V40
Send PM
User avatar
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
Joined: 30 Jul 2007
Posts: 385
Own Kudos [?]: 62 [0]
Given Kudos: 5
Location: Europe
Concentration: General Management
Schools:St. Gallen '09
 Q47  V40
Send PM
Re: Financial System is Broken [#permalink]
Recently, my mentor Sinclair was called to weigh in on an article in the New Yorker magazine:

https://www.newyorker.com/talk/2008/02/1 ... paumgarten

How ’Bout Them Economy
by Nick Paumgarten February 11, 2008

Nobody knows anything, although some know-nothings know more than others. The economy is a stalwart, a shambles, or some combination of the two. The pronouncements and analogies fly: we’ve reached the end of a sixty-year cycle, or a twenty-five-year cycle, or a six-year cycle, or the end of nothing. It’s 1929, 1969, 1981, 1990, 1997, or 2001 all over again. The closer you are to the markets, the gloomier you are, although the less likely you may be to suffer the consequences, and the more likely you are to act as though nothing were wrong: first rule of recession is you do not talk about recession. That is, unless you are in Davos, or heavily invested in gold. The preferred terms are “softening,” “crunch,” “correction,” and, best of all, “interesting,” as in “This is an interesting time”—a grudging corollary to the popular and meaningless Wall Streeter declaration “It is what it is.” Yes, and the faster we go the rounder we get.

The debate over whether we’re in (or slipping into) a recession is not purely semantic—a recession, capital “R,” is a term of art—but it recalls the argument over whether the Sunni insurgency in Iraq was actually an insurgency or merely stuff happening. Whatever you call it—“rough patch,” “adjustment process,” “perfect storm”—it’s here. Stuff is happening.

What’s most befuddling is the question of the worthless paper. By worthless paper, the experts don’t mean the one that people no longer read in the morning. They mean the I.O.U.s that stand no chance of being paid—the debt held by the person or institution who or which was foolish enough to buy it from the next-most-foolish person or institution, who or which may in fact have been not so much foolish as conniving (the F.B.I. is on the case). In recent years, the financial industry has concocted an arcane array of structured investment vehicles, in which the debts of individuals are bundled together by banks, stripped into pieces, and sold to investors. Many of these individual debts will not be repaid, and yet, once they’d been bundled and stripped, they were magically reconstituted as investment-grade debt products—worthy paper. Now the alchemy is coming undone; unpaid debts are revealing themselves to be unpayable. The extent of the damage will determine whether 2008 is 2001 or 1929, or something in between.

Although anyone making the case for looking on the bright side or the dark has to be suspected of talking his position, each argument is seductive, in its way. A call the other day to James Sinclair, a well-known gold bug, suggested that by decade’s end we’ll all be living in caves, or, at least, be carting our worthless paper around in wheelbarrows. “The geeks have killed us all,” he said, referring to the math whizzes who devised all the fancy, inscrutable derivatives. “There are more than five hundred trillion dollars’ worth of these things floating around in cyberspace. There’s no money in them.” As for the dollar, he said, citing the Weimar Republic, “How long can you monetize bankruptcy?”

A few minutes later, it was Arthur Gray on the line, from the Virgin Islands. Gray, who is eighty-five and a money manager at a firm called Carret, has been in the game since 1945. Age and experience incline him to the long view. “As Herman Kahn pointed out, two hundred years ago almost everyone was poor,” he said. “Today, somebody on welfare in our country lives better than a maharaja did two hundred years ago. The maharaja had two hundred slaves fanning him; today, you push a button and have air-conditioning. So, as Kahn said, two hundred years from now everybody will be affluent. I think it’s a wonderful world. I can’t call this thing more than a hiccup.” Hold your breath.
GMAT Club Bot
Re: Financial System is Broken [#permalink]

Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group | Emoji artwork provided by EmojiOne