Last visit was: 10 May 2024, 21:37 It is currently 10 May 2024, 21:37

Close
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Close
Request Expert Reply
Confirm Cancel
User avatar
Manager
Manager
Joined: 08 Nov 2008
Posts: 152
Own Kudos [?]: 1140 [0]
Given Kudos: 7
Send PM
User avatar
Manager
Manager
Joined: 30 Mar 2009
Posts: 109
Own Kudos [?]: 886 [0]
Given Kudos: 1
Send PM
User avatar
Manager
Manager
Joined: 08 Nov 2008
Posts: 152
Own Kudos [?]: 1140 [0]
Given Kudos: 7
Send PM
User avatar
Manager
Manager
Joined: 30 Mar 2009
Posts: 109
Own Kudos [?]: 886 [0]
Given Kudos: 1
Send PM
Re: gmatprep SC - were [#permalink]
tenaman10 wrote:
why would is required ...
still not able to understand ...request you to pls explain it further ..
thanks ..

It's a kind of reported speech, the state of an action at any time in the past:

The federal rules ... were established to ensure that patients would be warned ... and that an independent panel would evaluate ... --> here, the author wants to state about the future action: warning the patient, so he should think of will. However, because the context is being put in the past with the main action were established, any consequent or simultaneous action of it (the main action) will be reported by the same tense of it. Therefore, will in the past is would. Similarly, such rule is applied to the second clause
User avatar
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
Joined: 29 Aug 2005
Posts: 487
Own Kudos [?]: 2923 [0]
Given Kudos: 7
Concentration: Finance, Entrepreneurship
 Q50  V40
Send PM
Re: gmatprep SC - were [#permalink]
Sentence part after the underlined portion includes past tense - "were conducted". C and D is not compatible with this part of the sentence. E is best.
User avatar
Intern
Intern
Joined: 29 Sep 2008
Posts: 2
Own Kudos [?]: 4 [0]
Given Kudos: 2
Send PM
Re: gmatprep SC - were [#permalink]
IMO E

Pointers -

1. Parallelism (would)
2. "would" (past tense) goes with "were"



Archived Topic
Hi there,
This topic has been closed and archived due to inactivity or violation of community quality standards. No more replies are possible here.
Where to now? Join ongoing discussions on thousands of quality questions in our Sentence Correction (EA only) Forum
Still interested in this question? Check out the "Best Topics" block above for a better discussion on this exact question, as well as several more related questions.
Thank you for understanding, and happy exploring!
GMAT Club Bot
Re: gmatprep SC - were [#permalink]
Moderators:
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
6925 posts
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
238 posts
Current Student
278 posts

Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group | Emoji artwork provided by EmojiOne