if m not equal to zero is m^3 > m^2 ?
2) m^2 > m
The question asks if m^3 > m^2. We can safely divide by m^2 on both sides without worrying about whether to reverse the inequality, because m^2 can never be negative. So the question is just asking "Is m > 1?"
Statement 1 is now clearly not sufficient. Statement 2 is true for every negative number, but is also true when m > 1, so is not sufficient. When we combine the statements, we know m is positive from Statement 1, so we can safely divide both sides by m in Statement 2, and we find m > 1, which is what we wanted to prove. So the answer is C.
Nov 2011: After years of development, I am now making my advanced Quant books and high-level problem sets available for sale. Contact me at ianstewartgmat at gmail.com for details.
Private GMAT Tutor based in Toronto