Hi! Gave my GMAT today and scored 750 (Q50, V42). I thought this would be the most logical place for me to post experience of my GMAT journey. The reason being that a major part of my GMAT preparation journey has been about Verbal and in Verbal, more specifically about Sentence Correction; this journey could not have reached culmination without SC Nirvana.
It's been more than a year since I started flirting with the idea of appearing in GMAT. I am an Indian male and have twice appeared in CAT, scoring more than 95 percentile in Quant both times. English had always been a weaker area, and so, even before I started my preparation for GMAT, I knew that Verbal would be a challenge. However, I understood the "magnituide" of that challenge only after I got 7 questions in Sentence Correction correct, out of 30 odd questions that I first attempted from
OG. Critical reasoning and reading comprehension were much better (though I did not attempt those under time constraint).
After that, it was pretty much all about Sentence Correction. As a non-native English speaker, I knew I had to work on fundamentals "grounds-up" and was ready to put in the effort. So, my initial few weeks went into looking out for grammar books, only ending in realization that I would never be able to complete the sheer content in those books. I also read an expert comment that reading a grammar book end to end was not the best strategy for GMAT, because GMAT SCs require understanding of only a "subset" of the grammar rules.
So, my strategy changed and I thought that perhaps directly accessing the available GMAT Sentence Correction sources, would work best. This also turned out to be frustrating after few months, because the available material either "assumed" that we were already aware of English fundamentals, or was just too basic to address Sentence Correction thoroughly.
Incidentally, my roommate had joined coaching at EducationAisle then, and through him, I got to know about "Sentence Correction Nirvana". Within few days of my initial read of first few pages of this book, my interest in the book picked up. What initially interested me was the treatment given by the book to the grammar fundamentals: crisp and concise. All the "buzzwords" used by most experts on the GC/BTG forum, such as phrases, clauses, Independent, dependent, run on, relative clauses etc. were wonderfully explained.
Thereafter, the book utilized those grammar fundamentals, to build concepts in each specific topic. What also helped was the numerous pictures; reading the book almost felt as if someone was "teaching"! The deconstruction method of parallelism, the "doer of the verb" methodology in subject verb and the "logical/grammatical bifurcation" in modifiers were so effective. Not that it was a cakewalk ultimately. I had to read the entire book twice; but the thing is that after seeing a marked improvement in my SC skills after reading the book once, I didn't have to "push" myself to read it the second time:). In fact, I read the comparisons and ellipsis chapter thrice, but thereafter, I just mechanically applied their "comparison operator decision tree" and never ever got any comparison and ellipsis question wrong!
Over the last few days, when I was giving mocks, I was consistently scoring 40+ on verbal and am relieved that my performance did not dip in the exam. It's almost a surreal feeling today, as I write this, because after my initial "experience" with sentence correction (7 out of 30 correct!) and my early frustration with the available material, I had almost given up.
Apart from this, I scored a 6 in IR and (obviously) have not received AWA score, though I am quite sure I will score decently, since my CR skills are quite ok.