Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.
Customized for You
we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Track Your Progress
every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance
Practice Pays
we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Thank you for using the timer!
We noticed you are actually not timing your practice. Click the START button first next time you use the timer.
There are many benefits to timing your practice, including:
Ready to conquer GMAT's toughest Data Insights questions? Unlock the secrets of Graphical Interpretation & Two-Part Analysis with our expert-led webinar! Limited seats!
Grab 20% off any Target Test Prep GMAT Focus plan during our Flash Sale. Just enter the coupon code FLASH20 at checkout to save up to $320. The offer ends on Tuesday, April 30.
What do András from Hungary, Pablo from Mexico, Conner from the United States, Giorgio from Italy, Leo from Germany, and Rishab from India have in common? They all earned top scores on the GMAT Focus Edition using the Target Test Prep course!
What do András from Hungary, Conner from the United States, Giorgio from Italy, Leo from Germany, and Saahil from India have in common? They all earned top scores on the GMAT Focus Edition using the Target Test Prep course!
In this webinar, Rajat Sadana, GMAT Club’s #1 rated expert will help you create a personalized study plan so that each one of you can visualize your journey to a top GMAT Focus Score.
Still interested in this question? Check out the "Best Topics" block below for a better discussion on this exact question, as well as several more related questions.
Re: Several financial officers of the company spoke on condition
[#permalink]
21 Jul 2006, 01:11
ps_dahiya wrote:
A
Subjunctive mood. "be" is required. So C,D and E are out.
B is out because of wrong tense. We are talkingabout the past "spoke" and B switches to future tense.
A is using the proper past tense "named" and "be" for subjunctive mood.
I am not able to understand teh tense part here.. the condition still holds good at the moment even though speaking-activity has already happened..
So i am feeling 'will not' is ok here.. can you please explain ?
also, how can B be corrected without using subjunctive..
Schools:Completed at SAID BUSINESS SCHOOL, OXFORD - Class of 2008
Q50 V34
Send PM
Re: Several financial officers of the company spoke on condition
[#permalink]
21 Jul 2006, 07:05
sharadGmat wrote:
ps_dahiya wrote:
A
Subjunctive mood. "be" is required. So C,D and E are out.
B is out because of wrong tense. We are talkingabout the past "spoke" and B switches to future tense.
A is using the proper past tense "named" and "be" for subjunctive mood.
I am not able to understand teh tense part here.. the condition still holds good at the moment even though speaking-activity has already happened.. So i am feeling 'will not' is ok here.. can you please explain ?
also, how can B be corrected without using subjunctive..
When we speak of future in the past then use of "will" is wrong.
As stated in this example:
Several financial officers of the company spoke on condition that they not be named in the press reports.
"Spoke" means the moment has already passed. So we are talking of future in the past. This means its subjunctive mood and we should use "be".
One more example:
I would have scored higher if I had studied harder.
The bold part is a hypothetical situtaion. So its subjunctive mood.
Here use of past perfect (had) suggests use of "would have".
Still interested in this question? Check out the "Best Topics" block above for a better discussion on this exact question, as well as several more related questions.
Thank you for understanding, and happy exploring!
gmatclubot
Re: Several financial officers of the company spoke on condition [#permalink]