Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.
Customized for You
we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Track Your Progress
every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance
Practice Pays
we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Thank you for using the timer!
We noticed you are actually not timing your practice. Click the START button first next time you use the timer.
There are many benefits to timing your practice, including:
Ready to conquer GMAT's toughest Data Insights questions? Unlock the secrets of Graphical Interpretation & Two-Part Analysis with our expert-led webinar! Limited seats!
Grab 20% off any Target Test Prep GMAT Focus plan during our Flash Sale. Just enter the coupon code FLASH20 at checkout to save up to $320. The offer ends on Tuesday, April 30.
What do András from Hungary, Pablo from Mexico, Conner from the United States, Giorgio from Italy, Leo from Germany, and Rishab from India have in common? They all earned top scores on the GMAT Focus Edition using the Target Test Prep course!
What do András from Hungary, Conner from the United States, Giorgio from Italy, Leo from Germany, and Saahil from India have in common? They all earned top scores on the GMAT Focus Edition using the Target Test Prep course!
In this webinar, Rajat Sadana, GMAT Club’s #1 rated expert will help you create a personalized study plan so that each one of you can visualize your journey to a top GMAT Focus Score.
Last year, 1,200 Smithtown residents who work in hospitals
[#permalink]
28 Feb 2007, 10:18
1
Bookmarks
Show timer
00:00
A
B
C
D
E
Difficulty:
(N/A)
Question Stats:
0%
(00:00)
correct
0%
(00:00)
wrong
based on 6
sessions
HideShow
timer Statistics
Last year, 1,200 Smithtown residents who work in hospitals and doctors’ offices contracted the flu, and 1,100 Smithtown residents who are not employed in medical facilities contracted the flu. On the basis of these numbers, it is safe to conclude that the likelihood of contracting the flu was not much different for those who were employed in medical facilities than it was for those who were not.
Which of the following would reveal most clearly the irrationality of the conclusion above?
A) Counting cases of the flu among home health care workers as well as cases among workers at medical facilities
B) Expressing the difference between the numbers of flu cases among medical facility workers and others as a percentage of the total number of flu cases
C) Counting flu cases contracted by medical facility workers while at work separately from those contracted by medical facility workers while not at work
D) Comparing flu cases per hundred members of each group, rather than comparing total numbers of flu cases in each group
E) Comparing flu cases contracted in medical facilities by people who do not work in those facilities to flu cases contracted in medical facilities by people who do work in them
Archived Topic
Hi there,
This topic has been closed and archived due to inactivity or violation of community quality standards. No more replies are possible here.
Still interested in this question? Check out the "Best Topics" block below for a better discussion on this exact question, as well as several more related questions.
Re: Last year, 1,200 Smithtown residents who work in hospitals
[#permalink]
28 Feb 2007, 11:23
[quote="rdg"]Last year, 1,200 Smithtown residents who work in hospitals and doctors’ offices contracted the flu, and 1,100 Smithtown residents who are not employed in medical facilities contracted the flu. On the basis of these numbers, it is safe to conclude that the likelihood of contracting the flu was not much different for those who were employed in medical facilities than it was for those who were not.
Which of the following would reveal most clearly the irrationality of the conclusion above?
A) Counting cases of the flu among home health care workers as well as cases among workers at medical facilities
B) Expressing the difference between the numbers of flu cases among medical facility workers and others as a percentage of the total number of flu cases
C) Counting flu cases contracted by medical facility workers while at work separately from those contracted by medical facility workers while not at work
D) Comparing flu cases per hundred members of each group, rather than comparing total numbers of flu cases in each group
E) Comparing flu cases contracted in medical facilities by people who do not work in those facilities to flu cases contracted in medical facilities by people who do work in them[/quote]
C.
Argument doesnt take in account that workers at medical facilities may have contacted flu from people who came for checkups/medicines
Re: Last year, 1,200 Smithtown residents who work in hospitals
[#permalink]
28 Feb 2007, 11:33
Why not D? D could prove that percentage of sick hospital workers is higher than percentage of sick people outside the hospital. Therefore the likelihood of contracting the flu was different (higher) for those who were employed in medical facilities than it was for those who were not.
Re: Last year, 1,200 Smithtown residents who work in hospitals
[#permalink]
28 Feb 2007, 11:40
[quote="nervousgmat"]Why not D? D could prove that percentage of sick hospital workers is higher than percentage of sick people outside the hospital. Therefore the likelihood of contracting the flu was different (higher) for those who were employed in medical facilities than it was for those who were not.[/quote]
Re: Last year, 1,200 Smithtown residents who work in hospitals
[#permalink]
28 Feb 2007, 15:42
D
since hospital workers are a much smaller group, if they have the same number of cases as the reg population, the percentage in the hospital is a lot more
disproving that it's just as easy to contract in hospital, as it is outside
Re: Last year, 1,200 Smithtown residents who work in hospitals
[#permalink]
28 Feb 2007, 22:26
shrish123 wrote:
rdg wrote:
Last year, 1,200 Smithtown residents who work in hospitals and doctors’ offices contracted the flu, and 1,100 Smithtown residents who are not employed in medical facilities contracted the flu. On the basis of these numbers, it is safe to conclude that the likelihood of contracting the flu was not much different for those who were employed in medical facilities than it was for those who were not.
Which of the following would reveal most clearly the irrationality of the conclusion above?
A) Counting cases of the flu among home health care workers as well as cases among workers at medical facilities B) Expressing the difference between the numbers of flu cases among medical facility workers and others as a percentage of the total number of flu cases C) Counting flu cases contracted by medical facility workers while at work separately from those contracted by medical facility workers while not at work D) Comparing flu cases per hundred members of each group, rather than comparing total numbers of flu cases in each group E) Comparing flu cases contracted in medical facilities by people who do not work in those facilities to flu cases contracted in medical facilities by people who do work in them
C.
Argument doesnt take in account that workers at medical facilities may have contacted flu from people who came for checkups/medicines
I understand that you are trying to be sure that medical staff who contacted flu represent the medical staff. But that thing is taken for granted in the argument I guess.
The conclusion is focusing on staff and non staff. Hence, D seems to be the answer.
Archived Topic
Hi there,
This topic has been closed and archived due to inactivity or violation of community quality standards. No more replies are possible here.
Still interested in this question? Check out the "Best Topics" block above for a better discussion on this exact question, as well as several more related questions.
Thank you for understanding, and happy exploring!
gmatclubot
Re: Last year, 1,200 Smithtown residents who work in hospitals [#permalink]