Last visit was: 27 Apr 2024, 08:09 It is currently 27 Apr 2024, 08:09

Close
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Close
Request Expert Reply
Confirm Cancel
SORT BY:
Date
Tags:
Show Tags
Hide Tags
Math Expert
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Posts: 92952
Own Kudos [?]: 619403 [6]
Given Kudos: 81611
Send PM
Intern
Intern
Joined: 09 Dec 2014
Posts: 10
Own Kudos [?]: [0]
Given Kudos: 120
Send PM
Intern
Intern
Joined: 06 Oct 2023
Posts: 36
Own Kudos [?]: 12 [1]
Given Kudos: 61
GMAT 1: 660 Q47 V34
Send PM
GRE Forum Moderator
Joined: 02 Nov 2016
Posts: 13961
Own Kudos [?]: 32974 [1]
Given Kudos: 5780
GPA: 3.62
Send PM
Native Hawaiian temples on the island of Maui may have been built much [#permalink]
1
Kudos
Expert Reply
 
sagarnamo1 wrote:
­Can someone explain the third question ?

­
Explanation


3. Which of the following can most reasonably be inferred from the passage?

Explanation


A. This statement can be reasonably inferred from the passage. The passage mentions that researchers used a radiometric technique to date bits of branch coral collected from living reefs and incorporated ornamentally into the walls of several temples during construction. The technique measures both uranium-238 and thorium-230, into which the uranium decays at a known rate. The passage does not mention any process that would cause the coral to continue taking in thorium-230 after being harvested. Therefore, it is reasonable to infer that once the coral was harvested from the sea and incorporated into the temple walls, it ceased to take in thorium-230.

B. The passage mentions the use of coral branches ornamentally in the construction of temples and how these samples were used for dating purposes. However, there's no indication that the primary purpose of using coral was for structural reinforcement.

C. While the passage mentions that researchers dated bits of branch coral collected from living reefs and incorporated ornamentally into the walls of several temples, it does not specify whether the coral used in the temples was primarily made up of branch tips.

D. While the passage discusses the use of coral from living reefs in temple construction, it does not mention whether researchers identified specific reefs that supplied the coral.

E. While the passage indicates that researchers dated samples from the coral branch tips, it does not explicitly state that only the tips of the branch coral take in uranium-238 from seawater. It simply mentions that the branch coral was used for dating purposes.

Answer: A
­
Manager
Manager
Joined: 12 Oct 2023
Posts: 104
Own Kudos [?]: 46 [0]
Given Kudos: 129
Send PM
Native Hawaiian temples on the island of Maui may have been built much [#permalink]
Summary: The (dating) technique measures both uranium-238 and thorium-230, into which the uranium decays at a known rate. Dates on the samples that best reflect when they were harvested—those from the coral branch tips —ranged from 1608 to 1638, suggesting there was intensive temple building during that time


­3. Which of the following can most reasonably be inferred from the passage?

A. The coral in the temple walls did not take in thorium-230 after being harvested from the sea. - If Th-230 was taken in then it would cause errors in measurement of age ( more Th-230 acummulation mean more decay and even older time frame. We measure the age by Thorium decay, if additional Th-230 is present it would introduce errors )
B. Coral was used in the building of the temples partly to make the temples more structurally sound. - We don't know that
C. The coral incorporated into the temple walls is made up primarily of branch tips. -  We don't know what is the overall composition, we just know tips were used for research
D. Researchers have identified which reefs supplied the coral incorporated into the temples. - Researchers may have identified the reefs or maynot they just needed to take the samples from the coral brach tips used in temple construction, they don't need to extract it from the ocean
E. Only the tips of the branch coral take in uranium-238 from seawater. - We don't know that, scientists only use the tips for the experiment

Of A, C, D only A is Correct
­
Intern
Intern
Joined: 03 May 2023
Posts: 2
Own Kudos [?]: 0 [0]
Given Kudos: 5
Send PM
Re: Native Hawaiian temples on the island of Maui may have been built much [#permalink]
Please explain Q2. Why is answer not A?
GRE Forum Moderator
Joined: 02 Nov 2016
Posts: 13961
Own Kudos [?]: 32974 [0]
Given Kudos: 5780
GPA: 3.62
Send PM
Native Hawaiian temples on the island of Maui may have been built much [#permalink]
Expert Reply
 
butter_chicken wrote:
Please explain Q2. Why is answer not A?

Explanation


­2. Which of the following most accurately expresses the main point of the passage?

Explanation


The passage primarily discusses recent scientific research that supports the oral histories of Native Hawaiians regarding sociopolitical changes on the island of Maui. The researchers utilized an innovative radiometric dating technique involving coral to obtain dates that align with the oral histories, indicating intensive temple building during the early 17th century. This discovery significantly alters scientists’ previous estimates of the pace of sociopolitical change in Pacific Island cultures and improves their understanding of human history in the region. (B) is correct.

A. While the passage does reveal new evidence regarding the timing of sociopolitical changes on Maui, it does not specifically indicate whether these reforms were short-lived or not. The focus is more on aligning the scientific findings with oral histories and improving understanding of historical timelines, rather than assessing the duration of the reforms.

C. The passage does not suggest that oral histories prompted researchers to question previous research. Instead, it highlights how recent scientific research, using an innovative dating technique, corroborates the oral histories, thus supporting them and advancing understanding.

D. While the passage discusses the use of oral histories alongside scientific research, it does not imply that researchers specifically turned to oral histories as their primary source of evidence. The oral histories were used in conjunction with the innovative dating technique to enhance understanding.

E. While the passage does discuss the use of an innovative dating technique, the main point is not simply about the technique itself but rather about how this technique has contributed to improving scientists’ understanding of human history in the region, particularly in relation to sociopolitical changes.

Answer: B
­
Intern
Intern
Joined: 31 Oct 2023
Posts: 16
Own Kudos [?]: 1 [0]
Given Kudos: 128
Send PM
Re: Native Hawaiian temples on the island of Maui may have been built much [#permalink]
Why is option E for question 1 not correct?
GRE Forum Moderator
Joined: 02 Nov 2016
Posts: 13961
Own Kudos [?]: 32974 [1]
Given Kudos: 5780
GPA: 3.62
Send PM
Native Hawaiian temples on the island of Maui may have been built much [#permalink]
1
Kudos
Expert Reply
 
Jayam12 wrote:
Why is option E for question 1 not correct?

Explanation


­1. It is most reasonable to infer that the author uses the phrase "single generation of Hawaiians" in the final sentence of the passage to imply that

Explanation


A. While the dating of coral samples suggests a relatively short period of intensive temple construction, it does not necessarily imply that coral was only used decoratively for a short period. The focus is on the construction period, not specifically on the duration of coral usage.

B. The passage primarily discusses the construction of temples and the sociopolitical changes associated with them, but it does not provide evidence to suggest that temples served only a portion of the population.

C. While the passage mentions the use of a different radiometric dating technique involving uranium-238 and thorium-230, it does not provide an evaluation of the method's commendability. The focus is on how this method helped researchers obtain more precise dates for the temple construction, rather than evaluating the method itself.

D. is correct because the passage explicitly states that the events described in local oral histories align with the new dates obtained from the coral samples. The researchers' study provides tangible archaeological evidence supporting the oral histories regarding Pi'ilani's role in the sociopolitical changes on Maui.

E. While this statement might seem plausible given the context of the passage, it is not explicitly supported by the passage itself. The passage primarily focuses on the specific case of sociopolitical change on Maui related to temple construction and does not make a broader statement about the pace of change within all Pacific Island cultures.

Answer: D
­
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
Joined: 13 Aug 2009
Status: GMAT/GRE/LSAT tutors
Posts: 6923
Own Kudos [?]: 63680 [1]
Given Kudos: 1774
Location: United States (CO)
GMAT 1: 780 Q51 V46
GMAT 2: 800 Q51 V51
GRE 1: Q170 V170

GRE 2: Q170 V170
Send PM
Re: Native Hawaiian temples on the island of Maui may have been built much [#permalink]
1
Kudos
Expert Reply

Question 1


Riya1475828 wrote:
Can someone please explain Q1? GMATNinja? MartyMurray

­Question 1 asks why the author included a particular detail of the passage. To understand this kind of thing, it's important to look at the bigger picture. Why did the author write each paragraph, and the passage as a whole? Answering this will allow you to see the purpose of a smaller detail.

So, why did the author write each paragraph?

In the first paragraph, the author suggests that a longish timeline of temple-building may be wrong, but says that scientists haven't been able to confirm one way or the other. Perhaps the 250-year span of temple building is incorrect, and the actual timeline matches up with oral reports of a big change sometime around 1600. We just don't know.

In the second paragraph, the author provides evidence to confirm the shorter timeline, which matches up with oral reports from the native population. 

With this bigger picture in mind, why did the author use the phrase "single generation of Hawaiians" in the final line? Well, a single generation is a short period of time. So, this language is there to show that the new studies and the oral histories match up well -- both indicate that the changes occurred within a short period of time.

That aligns nicely with (D): "the researchers’ study is consistent with oral histories regarding Pi’ilani."

(D) is the correct answer to question 1.

I hope that helps!
GMAT Club Bot
Re: Native Hawaiian temples on the island of Maui may have been built much [#permalink]
Moderators:
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
6923 posts
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
238 posts
GRE Forum Moderator
13961 posts

Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group | Emoji artwork provided by EmojiOne