Last visit was: 25 Apr 2024, 18:25 It is currently 25 Apr 2024, 18:25

Close
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Close
Request Expert Reply
Confirm Cancel
User avatar
Director
Director
Joined: 04 May 2006
Posts: 866
Own Kudos [?]: 6811 [0]
Given Kudos: 1
Concentration: Finance
Schools:CBS, Kellogg
Send PM
User avatar
Manager
Manager
Joined: 04 Apr 2008
Posts: 126
Own Kudos [?]: 140 [0]
Given Kudos: 3
Location: Pune
Send PM
User avatar
Manager
Manager
Joined: 14 Mar 2007
Posts: 143
Own Kudos [?]: 372 [0]
Given Kudos: 3
Location: Hungary
Send PM
User avatar
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
Joined: 06 Jan 2008
Posts: 297
Own Kudos [?]: 4317 [0]
Given Kudos: 2
Send PM
Re: It is unclear whether chimpanzees are unique among nonhuman [#permalink]
It is unclear whether X or whether Y. So A, B, C out. Also we know 'whether' > 'if'.
I agree 'they' is making mess here. But, D is passive when compared with E.
"similar patterns would be exhibited " in D VS "other animals would exhibit similar patterns" in E.

Moreover, in depth is the right idiom.
"Studying in depth" is much better than "studying with depth"

searched for in depth. I got this https://idioms.thefreedictionary.com/depth
searched for with depth. I got this https://idioms.thefreedictionary.com/with+depth

Because D has 2 faults, E has 1 fault. So with confidence I vote for E.
lesson: Passive < ambiguous noun reference. :P
User avatar
Current Student
Joined: 28 Dec 2004
Posts: 1581
Own Kudos [?]: 642 [0]
Given Kudos: 2
Location: New York City
Concentration: Social Enterprise
Schools:Wharton'11 HBS'12
Send PM
Re: It is unclear whether chimpanzees are unique among nonhuman [#permalink]
"they" in E clearly and logically refers to other animals and as such is correct..

Whether is better usage than IF..
User avatar
Director
Director
Joined: 04 May 2006
Posts: 866
Own Kudos [?]: 6811 [0]
Given Kudos: 1
Concentration: Finance
Schools:CBS, Kellogg
Send PM
Re: It is unclear whether chimpanzees are unique among nonhuman [#permalink]
Thanks fresinha12, zoltan, apurva1985, OA is E

@saravalli, you focus effectively on each the detail, I wonder you are consultant or analysis, right? :-D

I like your explaination.




saravalli wrote:
It is unclear whether X or whether Y. So A, B, C out. Also we know 'whether' > 'if'.
I agree 'they' is making mess here. But, D is passive when compared with E.
"similar patterns would be exhibited " in D VS "other animals would exhibit similar patterns" in E.

Moreover, in depth is the right idiom.
"Studying in depth" is much better than "studying with depth"

searched for in depth. I got this https://idioms.thefreedictionary.com/depth
searched for with depth. I got this https://idioms.thefreedictionary.com/with+depth

Because D has 2 faults, E has 1 fault. So with confidence I vote for E.
lesson: Passive < ambiguous noun reference. :P
User avatar
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
Joined: 20 Sep 2006
Posts: 477
Own Kudos [?]: 299 [0]
Given Kudos: 7
Send PM
Re: It is unclear whether chimpanzees are unique among nonhuman [#permalink]
sondenso wrote:
Thanks fresinha12, zoltan, apurva1985, OA is E

@saravalli, you focus effectively on each the detail, I wonder you are consultant or analysis, right? :-D

I like your explaination.




saravalli wrote:
It is unclear whether X or whether Y. So A, B, C out. Also we know 'whether' > 'if'.
I agree 'they' is making mess here. But, D is passive when compared with E.
"similar patterns would be exhibited " in D VS "other animals would exhibit similar patterns" in E.

Moreover, in depth is the right idiom.
"Studying in depth" is much better than "studying with depth"

searched for in depth. I got this https://idioms.thefreedictionary.com/depth
searched for with depth. I got this https://idioms.thefreedictionary.com/with+depth

Because D has 2 faults, E has 1 fault. So with confidence I vote for E.
lesson: Passive < ambiguous noun reference. :P


my 2cs:

Some thumb rules:

If: is used when there is a if ...then condition.
Whether: used for comparision.

If and would should never come in same clause.

Even if you feel uncomfortable in finding the modifier issue sometimes you can get to the answer choice by elimination.



Archived Topic
Hi there,
This topic has been closed and archived due to inactivity or violation of community quality standards. No more replies are possible here.
Where to now? Join ongoing discussions on thousands of quality questions in our Sentence Correction (EA only) Forum
Still interested in this question? Check out the "Best Topics" block above for a better discussion on this exact question, as well as several more related questions.
Thank you for understanding, and happy exploring!
GMAT Club Bot
Re: It is unclear whether chimpanzees are unique among nonhuman [#permalink]
Moderators:
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
6921 posts
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
238 posts
Current Student
278 posts

Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group | Emoji artwork provided by EmojiOne