Last visit was: 25 Apr 2024, 17:16 It is currently 25 Apr 2024, 17:16

Close
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Close
Request Expert Reply
Confirm Cancel
User avatar
Manager
Manager
Joined: 01 May 2004
Posts: 232
Own Kudos [?]: 310 [0]
Given Kudos: 0
Location: USA
Send PM
User avatar
Director
Director
Joined: 30 Oct 2003
Posts: 899
Own Kudos [?]: 373 [0]
Given Kudos: 0
Location: NewJersey USA
Send PM
User avatar
Manager
Manager
Joined: 21 Jul 2004
Posts: 65
Own Kudos [?]: 20 [0]
Given Kudos: 0
Send PM
User avatar
VP
VP
Joined: 16 Oct 2003
Posts: 1018
Own Kudos [?]: 728 [0]
Given Kudos: 0
Send PM
Re: CR: explain paradox [#permalink]
I would go with E and try to explain with numbers if my answer is correct.
User avatar
Manager
Manager
Joined: 01 May 2004
Posts: 232
Own Kudos [?]: 310 [0]
Given Kudos: 0
Location: USA
Send PM
Re: CR: explain paradox [#permalink]
yes, OA is E.
BTW, my answer was A as Anandk's with similar reasoning. but it's wrong.

So, Bhai please explain your reasoning.
User avatar
Director
Director
Joined: 30 Oct 2003
Posts: 899
Own Kudos [?]: 373 [0]
Given Kudos: 0
Location: NewJersey USA
Send PM
Re: CR: explain paradox [#permalink]
hi Boksana,

I honestly try to apply a principle while solving CR problems but I have failed many times in doing that.

When an argument asks which of the following if TRUE ....

then anything outside the scope of the text of the argument can be applied to either refute or strengthen the argument. However if any of the choices bring in a possibility versus a definitive answer then we can reject it rightout for something that provides definitive answer.

For example in the pradoc CR
(A) and (E) are the contenders. But (A) just brings in a possibility saying more opportunities exist. Does this mean the high income people are making money through these opportunities. We cannot assume that.

(E) gives a definitive answer. Tax is always on a %age basis. More you earn more you pay and it has nothing to do with how hard or easy you work. The same applies to people with low incomes.



Archived Topic
Hi there,
This topic has been closed and archived due to inactivity or violation of community quality standards. No more replies are possible here.
Where to now? Join ongoing discussions on thousands of quality questions in our Critical Reasoning (CR) Forum
Still interested in this question? Check out the "Best Topics" block above for a better discussion on this exact question, as well as several more related questions.
Thank you for understanding, and happy exploring!
GMAT Club Bot
Re: CR: explain paradox [#permalink]
Moderators:
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
6921 posts
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
238 posts

Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group | Emoji artwork provided by EmojiOne