Last visit was: 28 Apr 2024, 15:18 It is currently 28 Apr 2024, 15:18

Close
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Close
Request Expert Reply
Confirm Cancel
User avatar
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
Joined: 19 Nov 2007
Posts: 251
Own Kudos [?]: 1007 [1]
Given Kudos: 4
Send PM
User avatar
Manager
Manager
Joined: 26 May 2005
Posts: 99
Own Kudos [?]: 257 [0]
Given Kudos: 1
Send PM
User avatar
Intern
Intern
Joined: 29 Oct 2009
Posts: 20
Own Kudos [?]: 83 [0]
Given Kudos: 14
Concentration: Finance
Schools:Cambridge
Send PM
User avatar
Manager
Manager
Joined: 24 Jul 2009
Posts: 155
Own Kudos [?]: 488 [0]
Given Kudos: 0
Send PM
Re: Jeanette: We must stop the overfishing of the Guantabe [#permalink]
vscid wrote:
Jeanette: We must stop the overfishing of the Guantabe fishing beds off the coast of Ecuador. Unless the overfishing is curtailed, several local species of fish may become extinct.
Sandra: The people who live on the Ecuadoran coast depend on the fish for their survival. To deprive them of this source of food might mean death by starvation.

Which of the following, if true, is the best objection that could be made from Jeanette’s point of view to counter Sandra’s point?


1] There are species of fish in other locations that are quite similar to the fish found in the Guantabe fishing beds.

2] Allowing particular species to breed unchecked can upset the delicate balance of the ecosystem in the entire area.

3] A steady diet of fish can raise the level of PCBs (known carcinogens) in the body of a human to dangerous levels.

4] In a study, it was found that the coastal Ecuadorians would willingly eat other foods when they were available.

5] The vast majority of the fish now taken from the Guantabe fishing beds is taken by commercial fishing ships that sell their catch in other countries.


E for me.
User avatar
Manager
Manager
Joined: 28 Aug 2009
Posts: 75
Own Kudos [?]: 191 [0]
Given Kudos: 1
Send PM
Re: Jeanette: We must stop the overfishing of the Guantabe [#permalink]
Argument talks about NOT CURTAILING FISHING stating that FISH IS SOURCE OF FOOD WHICH ,IF DENIED,MIGHT LEAD TO HUMAN STARVATION

However,if it can be shown that FISHING IS BEING DONE MUCH BEYOND THOSE TO MAINTAIN HHUMAN SURVIVAL LEVELS,it can be used to justfy the curtailing of
FISHING....
only E could be used to counter that SINCE WE ARE ALREADY OVERFISHING..SO MUCH BEYOND THE SURVIVAL LIMITS OVER TO COMMERCIAL EXPORTS...we should
curtail fishing.
User avatar
Manager
Manager
Joined: 25 Feb 2010
Posts: 208
Own Kudos [?]: 320 [0]
Given Kudos: 10
Send PM
Re: Jeanette: We must stop the overfishing of the Guantabe [#permalink]
+ 1 E

Clearly attacks the Sanda's basic premise

OA please?
User avatar
Manager
Manager
Joined: 07 Jan 2010
Posts: 83
Own Kudos [?]: 23 [0]
Given Kudos: 16
Send PM
Re: Jeanette: We must stop the overfishing of the Guantabe [#permalink]
yeah ...E
The counterargument is based on local consumption. E negates that view.
User avatar
Manager
Manager
Joined: 14 Apr 2010
Posts: 99
Own Kudos [?]: 961 [0]
Given Kudos: 1
Send PM
Re: Jeanette: We must stop the overfishing of the Guantabe [#permalink]
I would like to know what is wrong with D?
User avatar
Director
Director
Joined: 17 Feb 2010
Posts: 633
Own Kudos [?]: 3226 [0]
Given Kudos: 6
Send PM
Re: Jeanette: We must stop the overfishing of the Guantabe [#permalink]
E for me.
User avatar
Manager
Manager
Joined: 16 Jun 2010
Posts: 69
Own Kudos [?]: 103 [0]
Given Kudos: 1
 Q48  V36
Send PM
Re: Jeanette: We must stop the overfishing of the Guantabe [#permalink]
Not D because D negates the premise given by Sandra " The people who live on the Ecuadoran coast depend on the fish for their survival. "

Wheras E restects Sandra claim, concidering what she is saying is true and at the same time bring up another claim ( export of fish) to proce her point.

So E
User avatar
Manager
Manager
Joined: 09 Jul 2010
Posts: 57
Own Kudos [?]: 74 [0]
Given Kudos: 3
Send PM
Re: Jeanette: We must stop the overfishing of the Guantabe [#permalink]
rathoreaditya81 wrote:
Well, IMO the answer is E.
E attacks the Sanda's basic premise that the fishing is done by local and if disallowed, it will deprive people their staple food.


E my pick
User avatar
Manager
Manager
Joined: 25 Aug 2008
Posts: 100
Own Kudos [?]: 294 [0]
Given Kudos: 5
Location: India
WE 1: 3.75 IT
WE 2: 1.0 IT
Send PM
Re: Jeanette: We must stop the overfishing of the Guantabe [#permalink]
IMO answer is E
Intern
Intern
Joined: 01 Oct 2010
Posts: 47
Own Kudos [?]: 529 [0]
Given Kudos: 172
Send PM
Re: Jeanette: We must stop the overfishing of the Guantabe [#permalink]
+1 for E.

OA please!
User avatar
Intern
Intern
Joined: 07 Jul 2010
Posts: 36
Own Kudos [?]: 69 [0]
Given Kudos: 18
Location: Hanoi, Vietnam
Send PM
Re: Jeanette: We must stop the overfishing of the Guantabe [#permalink]
vscid wrote:
Jeanette: We must stop the overfishing of the Guantabe fishing beds off the coast of Ecuador. Unless the overfishing is curtailed, several local species of fish may become extinct.
Sandra: The people who live on the Ecuadoran coast depend on the fish for their survival. To deprive them of this source of food might mean death by starvation.

Which of the following, if true, is the best objection that could be made from Jeanette’s point of view to counter Sandra’s point?


1] There are species of fish in other locations that are quite similar to the fish found in the Guantabe fishing beds.

2] Allowing particular species to breed unchecked can upset the delicate balance of the ecosystem in the entire area.

3] A steady diet of fish can raise the level of PCBs (known carcinogens) in the body of a human to dangerous levels.

4] In a study, it was found that the coastal Ecuadorians would willingly eat other foods when they were available.

5] The vast majority of the fish now taken from the Guantabe fishing beds is taken by commercial fishing ships that sell their catch in other countries.


This question's reasoning is quite simple.
Jan: we should stop fishing
san: but it's the most important food.
So for Jan to counter San viewpoint, she must indicate that the majority of the caught fish is not for food => Choice E
User avatar
Manager
Manager
Joined: 03 Sep 2010
Posts: 53
Own Kudos [?]: 77 [0]
Given Kudos: 2
Location: Israel
GMAT 1: 660 Q47 V34
GMAT 2: 670 Q48 V34
GPA: 3.2
WE:Operations (Non-Profit and Government)
Send PM
Re: Jeanette: We must stop the overfishing of the Guantabe [#permalink]
+1 E.
Sandra - No fishing = starvation.
To make Sandra's point wrong we need to prove that the people in Ecuador could survive without fishing. Only E does that.



Archived Topic
Hi there,
This topic has been closed and archived due to inactivity or violation of community quality standards. No more replies are possible here.
Where to now? Join ongoing discussions on thousands of quality questions in our Critical Reasoning (CR) Forum
Still interested in this question? Check out the "Best Topics" block above for a better discussion on this exact question, as well as several more related questions.
Thank you for understanding, and happy exploring!
GMAT Club Bot
Re: Jeanette: We must stop the overfishing of the Guantabe [#permalink]
Moderators:
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
6923 posts
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
238 posts

Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group | Emoji artwork provided by EmojiOne