Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.
Customized for You
we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Track Your Progress
every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance
Practice Pays
we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Thank you for using the timer!
We noticed you are actually not timing your practice. Click the START button first next time you use the timer.
There are many benefits to timing your practice, including:
Grab 20% off any Target Test Prep GMAT Focus plan during our Flash Sale. Just enter the coupon code FLASH20 at checkout to save up to $320. The offer ends on Tuesday, April 30.
Ready to conquer GMAT's toughest Data Insights questions? Unlock the secrets of Graphical Interpretation & Two-Part Analysis with our expert-led webinar! Limited seats!
We present a collection of 30 GMAT Focus practice questions covering Problem Solving, Data Sufficiency, Data Insights, and Critical Reasoning. Take this GMAT practice quiz live with peers, analyze your GMAT study progress, and more.
n this GMAT experience talk show, we talk to Tavishi, a young MBA aspirant from India who recently scored 725 in her latest GMAT Focus exam. It’s a 99.9 percentile score on new GMAT Focus edition and she achieved this feat in her first GMAT attempt.
What do András from Hungary, Conner from the United States, Giorgio from Italy, Leo from Germany, and Saahil from India have in common? They all earned top scores on the GMAT Focus Edition using the Target Test Prep course!
In this webinar, Rajat Sadana, GMAT Club’s #1 rated expert will help you create a personalized study plan so that each one of you can visualize your journey to a top GMAT Focus Score.
Jeanette: We must stop the overfishing of the Guantabe
[#permalink]
07 Feb 2010, 16:31
1
Bookmarks
Show timer
00:00
A
B
C
D
E
Difficulty:
(N/A)
Question Stats:
35%
(01:15)
correct
65%
(01:23)
wrong
based on 40
sessions
HideShow
timer Statistics
Jeanette: We must stop the overfishing of the Guantabe fishing beds off the coast of Ecuador. Unless the overfishing is curtailed, several local species of fish may become extinct. Sandra: The people who live on the Ecuadoran coast depend on the fish for their survival. To deprive them of this source of food might mean death by starvation.
Which of the following, if true, is the best objection that could be made from Jeanette’s point of view to counter Sandra’s point?
1] There are species of fish in other locations that are quite similar to the fish found in the Guantabe fishing beds.
2] Allowing particular species to breed unchecked can upset the delicate balance of the ecosystem in the entire area.
3] A steady diet of fish can raise the level of PCBs (known carcinogens) in the body of a human to dangerous levels.
4] In a study, it was found that the coastal Ecuadorians would willingly eat other foods when they were available.
5] The vast majority of the fish now taken from the Guantabe fishing beds is taken by commercial fishing ships that sell their catch in other countries.
Archived Topic
Hi there,
This topic has been closed and archived due to inactivity or violation of community quality standards. No more replies are possible here.
Still interested in this question? Check out the "Best Topics" block below for a better discussion on this exact question, as well as several more related questions.
Re: Jeanette: We must stop the overfishing of the Guantabe
[#permalink]
07 Feb 2010, 21:03
Sandra's point is that the people only eat the fish found there and there is no other way the people will survive. To counter this, if we can say that the people do eat something else if necesary will weaken sandras claim.
Re: Jeanette: We must stop the overfishing of the Guantabe
[#permalink]
08 Feb 2010, 08:06
Well, IMO the answer is E. E attacks the Sanda's basic premise that the fishing is done by local and if disallowed, it will deprive people their staple food.
Re: Jeanette: We must stop the overfishing of the Guantabe
[#permalink]
08 Feb 2010, 08:14
vscid wrote:
Jeanette: We must stop the overfishing of the Guantabe fishing beds off the coast of Ecuador. Unless the overfishing is curtailed, several local species of fish may become extinct. Sandra: The people who live on the Ecuadoran coast depend on the fish for their survival. To deprive them of this source of food might mean death by starvation.
Which of the following, if true, is the best objection that could be made from Jeanette’s point of view to counter Sandra’s point?
1] There are species of fish in other locations that are quite similar to the fish found in the Guantabe fishing beds.
2] Allowing particular species to breed unchecked can upset the delicate balance of the ecosystem in the entire area.
3] A steady diet of fish can raise the level of PCBs (known carcinogens) in the body of a human to dangerous levels.
4] In a study, it was found that the coastal Ecuadorians would willingly eat other foods when they were available.
5] The vast majority of the fish now taken from the Guantabe fishing beds is taken by commercial fishing ships that sell their catch in other countries.
Re: Jeanette: We must stop the overfishing of the Guantabe
[#permalink]
08 Feb 2010, 12:48
Argument talks about NOT CURTAILING FISHING stating that FISH IS SOURCE OF FOOD WHICH ,IF DENIED,MIGHT LEAD TO HUMAN STARVATION
However,if it can be shown that FISHING IS BEING DONE MUCH BEYOND THOSE TO MAINTAIN HHUMAN SURVIVAL LEVELS,it can be used to justfy the curtailing of FISHING.... only E could be used to counter that SINCE WE ARE ALREADY OVERFISHING..SO MUCH BEYOND THE SURVIVAL LIMITS OVER TO COMMERCIAL EXPORTS...we should curtail fishing.
Re: Jeanette: We must stop the overfishing of the Guantabe
[#permalink]
14 Jul 2010, 01:53
Not D because D negates the premise given by Sandra " The people who live on the Ecuadoran coast depend on the fish for their survival. "
Wheras E restects Sandra claim, concidering what she is saying is true and at the same time bring up another claim ( export of fish) to proce her point.
Re: Jeanette: We must stop the overfishing of the Guantabe
[#permalink]
15 Jul 2010, 02:13
rathoreaditya81 wrote:
Well, IMO the answer is E. E attacks the Sanda's basic premise that the fishing is done by local and if disallowed, it will deprive people their staple food.
Re: Jeanette: We must stop the overfishing of the Guantabe
[#permalink]
17 Jan 2011, 08:40
vscid wrote:
Jeanette: We must stop the overfishing of the Guantabe fishing beds off the coast of Ecuador. Unless the overfishing is curtailed, several local species of fish may become extinct. Sandra: The people who live on the Ecuadoran coast depend on the fish for their survival. To deprive them of this source of food might mean death by starvation.
Which of the following, if true, is the best objection that could be made from Jeanette’s point of view to counter Sandra’s point?
1] There are species of fish in other locations that are quite similar to the fish found in the Guantabe fishing beds.
2] Allowing particular species to breed unchecked can upset the delicate balance of the ecosystem in the entire area.
3] A steady diet of fish can raise the level of PCBs (known carcinogens) in the body of a human to dangerous levels.
4] In a study, it was found that the coastal Ecuadorians would willingly eat other foods when they were available.
5] The vast majority of the fish now taken from the Guantabe fishing beds is taken by commercial fishing ships that sell their catch in other countries.
This question's reasoning is quite simple. Jan: we should stop fishing san: but it's the most important food. So for Jan to counter San viewpoint, she must indicate that the majority of the caught fish is not for food => Choice E
Re: Jeanette: We must stop the overfishing of the Guantabe
[#permalink]
17 Jan 2011, 14:26
+1 E. Sandra - No fishing = starvation. To make Sandra's point wrong we need to prove that the people in Ecuador could survive without fishing. Only E does that.
Archived Topic
Hi there,
This topic has been closed and archived due to inactivity or violation of community quality standards. No more replies are possible here.
Still interested in this question? Check out the "Best Topics" block above for a better discussion on this exact question, as well as several more related questions.
Thank you for understanding, and happy exploring!
gmatclubot
Re: Jeanette: We must stop the overfishing of the Guantabe [#permalink]