staind wrote:
bakfed wrote:
Alright folks, now that we're in playoff season and as I'm sure everyone who's an NBA fan has a team that he/she is cheering for, here's my take on it.
As much as I enjoy watching D-Rose tearing it up on the floor against the Pacers, it'll be hard for the Bulls to make it too far in the playoff if the team itself can't step up to the plate. A team requires more than just a one-man show (i.e. Rose right now) puttnig up 39 points a game. It has to be a well-balanced team, with all positions covered. Boozer stepped it up on the second game, but he's got a lot to show still. Overall, I'm liking the Bulls if they're able to conquer their own mentality. the boston-ny games have been quite exciting. Who would've thought that NY could put up such a fight against the champion of the east side from last year. I'm still going for the celtics on this round though. The heat, nothing to say there.
In terms of the west side, I wouldn't worry too much for the lakers. I think lakers will prove it to themselves and to the fans that they're still able to take down another championship ring this season. A lot of games are on tonight and I'm sure there's going to be some upset still, but it's going to be interesting coming down the wire.
Actually a "one-man show" can win the NBA championship.. check out these stats (courtesy a comment from ESPN after Game 2 of the Bulls-Pacers series):
Here are this year's Bulls playoffs scoring statistics for the top 5 scorers:
Rose 37.5
Deng 16.0
Boozer 14.5
Korver 9.0
Noah 7.0
Now, here are the stats for the top five scorers for 3 other title years for the Bulls:
97-98
Jordan 32.4
Pippen 16.8
Kukoc 13.1
Longley 7.9
Harper 6.7
95-96
Jordan 30.7
Pippen 16.9
Kukoc 10.8
Harper 8.8
Longley 8.3
91-92
Jordan 34.5
Pippen 19.5
Grant 11.3
Paxson 7.9
Armstrong 7.3
This is good data; however, it doesn't capture everything completely. Points per game is certainly important, but can be deeply skewed by the number of attempts made (fieldgoal made-attempt, or FGM-A on nba.com). I'm sure that if someone were shoot 100 shots per game, he is bound to make at leaset 20 shots (I hope). The point system will capture only 40 points per game, but not the number of attempts. In looking back to jordan's time, 1991-1992 he made 943 out of 1818 field goals, bringing his shooting percentage to a fascinating .519. In 1995-1996, he shot a .495 percent and in 1997-1998, Jordan .465. This is an overall shooting percentage, including playoffs (too much work to dig up jordan's shooting percentage merely in the playoffs, but I can't imagine it too far stretched away from his overall percentage). If you were to look at Rose's shooting percentage in his current playoff situation (4 games thus far), he shot 88 times and made only 31 of them. That brings his shooting percentage to a mere .352, which is much lower than Jordan's. In fact, if you were to look at a team who can win it all at the end, at least a few of them will be in the .400 and it won't be a surprise to see the star player (such as jordan) inching closer to the 500 mark (or surpassing it in Jordan's 1991-1992 era). D-Rose is a fantastic player, but at his current rate, it'll be hard for the bulls to win it all unless rose and others step it up a notch.