Find all School-related info fast with the new School-Specific MBA Forum

It is currently 21 Aug 2014, 16:03

Close

GMAT Club Daily Prep

Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.

Events & Promotions

Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

Please rate my essay. Feedback would be greatly appreciated.

  Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  
Author Message
Intern
Intern
avatar
Joined: 04 Nov 2012
Posts: 9
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 1 [0], given: 7

GMAT ToolKit User
Please rate my essay. Feedback would be greatly appreciated. [#permalink] New post 08 Feb 2013, 00:02
ESSAY QUESTION:
The following appeared in the personal finance section of a popular magazine:

“The average price of an acre of land in the United States is now 50 times what it was in 1970, and nearly 200 times what it was in 1920. The nation’s population is projected to keep increasing, even as the amount of land remains constant. Therefore, people who are approaching retirement should invest heavily in real estate in order to ensure their financial security.”


MY RESPONSE:
The argument claims that the average price of an acre of land in the United States is now 50 times what it was in 1970, and nearly 200 times what it was in 1920. The nation’s population is projected to keep increasing, even as the amount of land remains constant. Therefore, people who are approaching retirement should invest heavily in real estate in order to ensure their financial security. Stated in this way the argument fails to mention several key factors, on the basis of which it could be evaluated. The conclusion relies on assumptions, for which there is no clear evidence. Therefore, the argument is rather weak, unconvincing, and has several flaws.

First, the argument readily assumes that when individuals are approaching retirement, these individuals are getting "old". As such, there is a need to "ensure their financial security." However, "retirement" could be rather misleading, as someone much younger could "retire" due to financial freedom. For instance, Ray Lewis, a famous American football player, is retiring from his job at the age of 37. With a net worth of approximately $50 million and at the age of 37, protecting financial security through real estate investment, although sounds like one possible idea, may not sound like the best approach for Ray Lewis. Instead, he can leverage his wealth and relative youth and look into riskier investments, such as the stock market. The argument would have been much clearer if it explicitly stated the age and the financial situation of the population.

Second, the argument claims that a heavy investment in real estate will provide "financial security" for older individuals who are approaching retirement. Now, assuming the average age of retirement in the United States is 65 years old. Around that age, having the financial liquidity is very important, as it is natural for people to get sick as they age. Even if real estate represents a sound investment concept, it is ultimately not a "liquid" investment, as it takes months, if not years, to sell the real estate properties. As a result, being heavily invested in real estate would not be a good idea for older individuals, since their investment would be "tied up" - and they can't readily convert a real estate property to cash if medical emergency hits.

Finally, the argument suggests that investing in real estate represents a "secure" investment. This is again a very weak and unsupported claim as the argument does not consider the housing bubble the United States has been in. In fact, the real estate investment has been anything but secure over the past five years. There are a lot of inherit risks the argument failed to consider, including subprime mortgage crisis, credit defaults, etc. If the individuals nearing retirement were savvy with the stock market, it can be argued that investing in blue-chip stocks would represent a better investment strategy than locking in the money in real estate properties.

In summary, the argument is flawed and therefore unconvincing. It could be considerably strengthened if the author clearly mentioned all the relevant facts. In order to assess the merits of a certain situation, it is essential to have full knowledge of all contributing factors.
Please rate my essay. Feedback would be greatly appreciated.   [#permalink] 08 Feb 2013, 00:02
    Similar topics Author Replies Last post
Similar
Topics:
Would you give some feedbacks on my Toefl essay please? indirka 0 21 Aug 2012, 01:37
Experts publish their posts in the topic Any input would be greatly appreciated! barn423 3 09 May 2012, 18:11
Experts publish their posts in the topic Please give feedback and a rating on my AWA Argument essay rishabhsingla 9 14 Sep 2010, 08:41
would appreciate a rating of my essays and your thoughts cooljay68 0 09 Nov 2009, 07:49
Evaluation of my profile would be greatly appreciated buckkitty 5 19 Sep 2006, 10:41
Display posts from previous: Sort by

Please rate my essay. Feedback would be greatly appreciated.

  Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  


cron

GMAT Club MBA Forum Home| About| Privacy Policy| Terms and Conditions| GMAT Club Rules| Contact| Sitemap

Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group and phpBB SEO

Kindly note that the GMAT® test is a registered trademark of the Graduate Management Admission Council®, and this site has neither been reviewed nor endorsed by GMAC®.