Last visit was: 13 May 2024, 09:20 It is currently 13 May 2024, 09:20

Close
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Close
Request Expert Reply
Confirm Cancel
SORT BY:
Kudos
Tags:
Show Tags
Hide Tags
avatar
Intern
Intern
Joined: 02 Oct 2010
Posts: 2
Own Kudos [?]: [0]
Given Kudos: 0
Send PM
avatar
Manager
Manager
Joined: 25 Feb 2010
Status:I will not stop until i realise my goal which is my dream too
Posts: 105
Own Kudos [?]: 258 [0]
Given Kudos: 16
Schools: Johnson '15
Send PM
avatar
Intern
Intern
Joined: 02 Oct 2010
Posts: 2
Own Kudos [?]: [0]
Given Kudos: 0
Send PM
avatar
Manager
Manager
Joined: 25 Feb 2010
Status:I will not stop until i realise my goal which is my dream too
Posts: 105
Own Kudos [?]: 258 [0]
Given Kudos: 16
Schools: Johnson '15
Send PM
Re: Please rate my response to AWA Argument [#permalink]
well...

First para actually is the introduction para. But here too efficiency is probably not defined properly or rather strongly. Hence the the argument seems to be not strong enough.

the Example about Google and Face-book seems not to go well.may be much stronger example needs to be mentioned to bring out the case strongly.

But from the first para, i tend to believe that you are actually trying to take a mid path saying in some instances single product companies are successful while at the same time saying it is possible for the other companies which are selling more services are successful too. But in the further paras actually try to create more confusion regarding your opinion.

third para is assuming so many things. In fact an example of a successful company which is offering multiple services and an example of successful company which is offering a single product would bring much more emphasis on your argument about the issue.

but in the end you are emphasizing you don't agree with the issue "“Since no business can be all things at once, companies that specialize in one product or service are more efficient than those that offer a diverse product mix.”

well once again, this is my opinion
GMAT Club Bot
Re: Please rate my response to AWA Argument [#permalink]
Moderators:
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
6927 posts
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
238 posts

Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group | Emoji artwork provided by EmojiOne