Last visit was: 25 Apr 2024, 19:50 It is currently 25 Apr 2024, 19:50

Close
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Close
Request Expert Reply
Confirm Cancel
SORT BY:
Date
Tags:
Show Tags
Hide Tags
avatar
Intern
Intern
Joined: 25 Nov 2013
Posts: 14
Own Kudos [?]: 42 [35]
Given Kudos: 6
Location: Italy
GMAT 1: 720 Q49 V38
Send PM
Most Helpful Reply
Math Expert
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Posts: 92915
Own Kudos [?]: 619039 [5]
Given Kudos: 81595
Send PM
General Discussion
Tutor
Joined: 20 Dec 2013
Posts: 104
Own Kudos [?]: 243 [4]
Given Kudos: 1
Send PM
avatar
Intern
Intern
Joined: 25 Nov 2013
Posts: 14
Own Kudos [?]: 42 [1]
Given Kudos: 6
Location: Italy
GMAT 1: 720 Q49 V38
Send PM
Re: What is the ratio x : y: z ? [#permalink]
1
Bookmarks
Bunuel wrote:
Ric123 wrote:
What is the ratio x : y: z ?

(1) x + y = 2 z
(2) 2x + 3y = z

Hi all,

I read here:

https://www.manhattangmat.com/errata-fdp-5ed.cfm

about some mistakes in the guide of Manhattan GMAT FDPs, 5th edition.
I focused my attention on the third one: "The answer to the question as written is (E). The question should stipulate that xyz > 0".
This was the DS exercise:

Solution:
(1) INSUFFICIENT, because if you try to isolate x/y you get a variable expression.
(2) the same
(1)+(2) SUFFICIENT:
x + y = 2z &
2x+ 3y = z so
x+ y = 2(2*+ 3y)
x + y = 4x + 6y and finally you get
x/y = 5/(-3)
You can do the same to get y/z = -3
So you have x : y = -5/3 & y / z =-3/1 -> x : y : z = 5 : -3 : 1

Now, saying x:y = 1:2 or 2:4 is the same.
In the same way, I can say x:y=1:2 or -1:-2.
So, given x : y : z = 5 : -3 : 1 we may have two variables positive and one negative, or two negative and one positive, but that doesn't matter, because we are interested in the ratio (that, if wholly multiplied by -1, doesn't change its meaning).
In the Errata from the link I've posted, Manhattan GMAT team says that we must specify xyz > 0 , that means we must specify that we want the two-variables-positive-and-one-negative case. But I believe is not necessary; in fact we do not care about the single variables, but about their ratio.

In conclusion I think that the answer to this DS is C even without the condition xyz > 0.

Someone can confirm me this?

Thank you.

Ric


We need xyz>0 condition to know that neither of the variables is 0. Notice that x=y=z=0, satisfy both statements and in this case x:y:z is undefined and not 5 : -3 : 1.

Hope it's clear.

P.S. Please read carefully and follow: rules-for-posting-please-read-this-before-posting-133935.html Pay attention to the rules 2, 3, 7, and 10. Thank you.


Thank you, now it is clear.
I read the rules, and I will follow them from now.
avatar
Manager
Manager
Joined: 17 Mar 2014
Posts: 61
Own Kudos [?]: 224 [1]
Given Kudos: 38
Send PM
Re: What is the ratio x : y: z ? [#permalink]
1
Bookmarks
Ric123 wrote:
What is the ratio x : y: z ?

(1) x + y = 2 z
(2) 2x + 3y = z

Hi all,

I read here:

https://www.manhattangmat.com/errata-fdp-5ed.cfm

about some mistakes in the guide of Manhattan GMAT FDPs, 5th edition.
I focused my attention on the third one: "The answer to the question as written is (E). The question should stipulate that xyz > 0".
This was the DS exercise:

Solution:
(1) INSUFFICIENT, because if you try to isolate x/y you get a variable expression.
(2) the same
(1)+(2) SUFFICIENT:
x + y = 2z &
2x+ 3y = z so
x+ y = 2(2*+ 3y)
x + y = 4x + 6y and finally you get
x/y = 5/(-3)
You can do the same to get y/z = -3
So you have x : y = -5/3 & y / z =-3/1 -> x : y : z = 5 : -3 : 1

Now, saying x:y = 1:2 or 2:4 is the same.
In the same way, I can say x:y=1:2 or -1:-2.
So, given x : y : z = 5 : -3 : 1 we may have two variables positive and one negative, or two negative and one positive, but that doesn't matter, because we are interested in the ratio (that, if wholly multiplied by -1, doesn't change its meaning).
In the Errata from the link I've posted, Manhattan GMAT team says that we must specify xyz > 0 , that means we must specify that we want the two-variables-positive-and-one-negative case. But I believe is not necessary; in fact we do not care about the single variables, but about their ratio.

In conclusion I think that the answer to this DS is C even without the condition xyz > 0.

Someone can confirm me this?

Thank you.

Ric


Hey Ric,

Can anyone tell me why MGMAT chose to go with xyz>0 instead of \(xyz\neq0\)
Could \(xyx\neq0\)lead to answer being C or E ?
avatar
Intern
Intern
Joined: 25 Nov 2013
Posts: 14
Own Kudos [?]: 42 [0]
Given Kudos: 6
Location: Italy
GMAT 1: 720 Q49 V38
Send PM
What is the ratio x : y: z ? [#permalink]
qlx wrote:
Ric123 wrote:
What is the ratio x : y: z ?

(1) x + y = 2 z
(2) 2x + 3y = z

Hi all,

I read here:

https://www.manhattangmat.com/errata-fdp-5ed.cfm

about some mistakes in the guide of Manhattan GMAT FDPs, 5th edition.
I focused my attention on the third one: "The answer to the question as written is (E). The question should stipulate that xyz > 0".
This was the DS exercise:

Solution:
(1) INSUFFICIENT, because if you try to isolate x/y you get a variable expression.
(2) the same
(1)+(2) SUFFICIENT:
x + y = 2z &
2x+ 3y = z so
x+ y = 2(2*+ 3y)
x + y = 4x + 6y and finally you get
x/y = 5/(-3)
You can do the same to get y/z = -3
So you have x : y = -5/3 & y / z =-3/1 -> x : y : z = 5 : -3 : 1

Now, saying x:y = 1:2 or 2:4 is the same.
In the same way, I can say x:y=1:2 or -1:-2.
So, given x : y : z = 5 : -3 : 1 we may have two variables positive and one negative, or two negative and one positive, but that doesn't matter, because we are interested in the ratio (that, if wholly multiplied by -1, doesn't change its meaning).
In the Errata from the link I've posted, Manhattan GMAT team says that we must specify xyz > 0 , that means we must specify that we want the two-variables-positive-and-one-negative case. But I believe is not necessary; in fact we do not care about the single variables, but about their ratio.

In conclusion I think that the answer to this DS is C even without the condition xyz > 0.

Someone can confirm me this?

Thank you.

Ric


Hey Ric,

Can anyone tell me why MGMAT chose to go with xyz>0 instead of \(xyz\neq0\)
Could \(xyx\neq0\)lead to answer being C or E ?


Hi qlx,

As I wrote in the original post saying x:y=1:2 or x:y=-1:-2 is the same.
So, stated x : y : z = 5 : -3 : 1, we know that the sign of y is different from the sign of x and z, but we do not know whether we have one positive variable and two negative ones, or the opposite. However, we do not need that information, because it does not impact the value of the ratio.
xyz>0 tells us also that we are in the first case (two negative variables and one positive), but we didn't need to know that information to find the ratio. As Bunuel specified, we need to know only that none of them is zero. Note that xyz<0 would tell us that none of the variables is zero, and that one of them is negative (must be y).
I think that xyz different from zero is enough to define the required ratio, leading to C answer, even if we can't say the signs of the three variables.
Retired Moderator
Joined: 02 Apr 2014
Status:I Declare War!!!
Posts: 218
Own Kudos [?]: 122 [0]
Given Kudos: 546
Location: United States
Concentration: Finance, Economics
GMAT Date: 03-18-2015
WE:Asset Management (Investment Banking)
Send PM
Re: What is the ratio x : y: z ? [#permalink]
Hi,
I straight away went to C Or E.
in ext 5 seconds I sensed that 3 unknown, and two equations
so came to E directly.
Its a fluke that answer was correct.
Please evaluate my approach.
Thanks
Celestial
User avatar
Retired Moderator
Joined: 06 Jul 2014
Posts: 1010
Own Kudos [?]: 6341 [0]
Given Kudos: 178
Location: Ukraine
Concentration: Entrepreneurship, Technology
GMAT 1: 660 Q48 V33
GMAT 2: 740 Q50 V40
Send PM
What is the ratio x : y: z ? [#permalink]
Celestial09 wrote:
Hi,
I straight away went to C Or E.
in ext 5 seconds I sensed that 3 unknown, and two equations
so came to E directly.
Its a fluke that answer was correct.
Please evaluate my approach.
Thanks
Celestial


Hello Celestial09
When you need to find exact values of these unknowns then it definetely E and your approach right.

But in our case you should find only ratios and this is C.
There is possible another trick when task asks about sum of two unknowns and sometimes it's possible to find even when we have three unknowns and two equations.
In this types of tasks your approach is a pitfall.

P.S. as was already said in this case was a typo about signs of this unknowns and this transform answer to the E
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
Joined: 08 Dec 2015
Posts: 258
Own Kudos [?]: 117 [0]
Given Kudos: 36
GMAT 1: 600 Q44 V27
Send PM
Re: What is the ratio x : y: z ? [#permalink]
People, is adding, subtracting the equations the right approach here? Isn't it used to find exact values for variables? Eliminate one var. and discover the other, plug in, solve, fine. But here we don't want exact values, so why are you manipulating the equations like this?..

Do I make myself clear? Thanks!
IIM School Moderator
Joined: 04 Sep 2016
Posts: 1261
Own Kudos [?]: 1239 [0]
Given Kudos: 1207
Location: India
WE:Engineering (Other)
Send PM
Re: What is the ratio x : y: z ? [#permalink]
niks18 gmatbusters pushpitkc amanvermagmat

Quote:
What is the ratio x : y: z ?

(1) x + y = 2 z
(2) 2x + 3y = z


How about this approach?
We have three unique linear equations to solve for x,y and z.
Since we do not have third eq, clearly (E).
Director
Director
Joined: 05 Jan 2020
Status:Admitted to IIM Shillong (PGPEx 2023-24)
Affiliations: CFA Institute; ICAI; BCAS
Posts: 588
Own Kudos [?]: 554 [0]
Given Kudos: 694
Location: India
WE 2: EA to CFO (Consumer Products)
GPA: 3.78
WE:Corporate Finance (Commercial Banking)
Send PM
What is the ratio x : y: z ? [#permalink]
Ric123 wrote:
qlx wrote:
Ric123 wrote:
What is the ratio x : y: z ?

(1) x + y = 2 z
(2) 2x + 3y = z

Hi all,

I read here:

https://www.manhattangmat.com/errata-fdp-5ed.cfm

about some mistakes in the guide of Manhattan GMAT FDPs, 5th edition.
I focused my attention on the third one: "The answer to the question as written is (E). The question should stipulate that xyz > 0".
This was the DS exercise:

Solution:
(1) INSUFFICIENT, because if you try to isolate x/y you get a variable expression.
(2) the same
(1)+(2) SUFFICIENT:
x + y = 2z &
2x+ 3y = z so
x+ y = 2(2*+ 3y)
x + y = 4x + 6y and finally you get
x/y = 5/(-3)
You can do the same to get y/z = -3
So you have x : y = -5/3 & y / z =-3/1 -> x : y : z = 5 : -3 : 1

Now, saying x:y = 1:2 or 2:4 is the same.
In the same way, I can say x:y=1:2 or -1:-2.
So, given x : y : z = 5 : -3 : 1 we may have two variables positive and one negative, or two negative and one positive, but that doesn't matter, because we are interested in the ratio (that, if wholly multiplied by -1, doesn't change its meaning).
In the Errata from the link I've posted, Manhattan GMAT team says that we must specify xyz > 0 , that means we must specify that we want the two-variables-positive-and-one-negative case. But I believe is not necessary; in fact we do not care about the single variables, but about their ratio.

In conclusion I think that the answer to this DS is C even without the condition xyz > 0.

Someone can confirm me this?

Thank you.

Ric


Hey Ric,

Can anyone tell me why MGMAT chose to go with xyz>0 instead of \(xyz\neq0\)
Could \(xyx\neq0\)lead to answer being C or E ?


Hi qlx,

As I wrote in the original post saying x:y=1:2 or x:y=-1:-2 is the same.
So, stated x : y : z = 5 : -3 : 1, we know that the sign of y is different from the sign of x and z, but we do not know whether we have one positive variable and two negative ones, or the opposite. However, we do not need that information, because it does not impact the value of the ratio.
xyz>0 tells us also that we are in the first case (two negative variables and one positive), but we didn't need to know that information to find the ratio. As Bunuel specified, we need to know only that none of them is zero. Note that xyz<0 would tell us that none of the variables is zero, and that one of them is negative (must be y).
I think that xyz different from zero is enough to define the required ratio, leading to C answer, even if we can't say the signs of the three variables.

Bunuel

Can you please confirm that both x : y : z = 5 : -3 : 1 and x : y : z = -5 : 3 : -1 are the same and so the answer would be C if given that \(xyz\neq0\)
GMAT Club Bot
What is the ratio x : y: z ? [#permalink]
Moderator:
Math Expert
92915 posts

Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group | Emoji artwork provided by EmojiOne