Last visit was: 26 Apr 2024, 03:02 It is currently 26 Apr 2024, 03:02

Close
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Close
Request Expert Reply
Confirm Cancel
SORT BY:
Date
Tags:
Show Tags
Hide Tags
User avatar
Manager
Manager
Joined: 07 Dec 2010
Posts: 86
Own Kudos [?]: 267 [14]
Given Kudos: 12
Concentration: Marketing, General Management
Send PM
Most Helpful Reply
SVP
SVP
Joined: 17 Nov 2007
Posts: 2408
Own Kudos [?]: 10036 [8]
Given Kudos: 361
Concentration: Entrepreneurship, Other
Schools: Chicago (Booth) - Class of 2011
GMAT 1: 750 Q50 V40
Send PM
SVP
SVP
Joined: 17 Nov 2007
Posts: 2408
Own Kudos [?]: 10036 [5]
Given Kudos: 361
Concentration: Entrepreneurship, Other
Schools: Chicago (Booth) - Class of 2011
GMAT 1: 750 Q50 V40
Send PM
General Discussion
User avatar
Manager
Manager
Joined: 07 Oct 2010
Posts: 102
Own Kudos [?]: 344 [1]
Given Kudos: 10
Send PM
Re: 650 plus level question [#permalink]
1
Kudos
walker wrote:
Actually you can solve the problem pretty fast by using following approach:

1. one shorter inside strip with width of 20 ft takes 20/2000 = 1% of field
2. There is 2 short strips, 2 long strips (twice as long as shorts ones) and one short but wider strip that equals 30/20 = 1.5 short strips.
3. Approximately we have 2 + 2*2 + 1.5 = 7.5 short strips --> ~ 7.5% or 92.5%
4. As we didn't take into account overlaps between strips it will be slightly higher than 92.5%.

Or you can use calculations but I think it will take more time:

\(%=100%*\frac{2*(1000-2*20)*(1000-20-\frac{30}{2})}{1000*2000} = 0.9264\)


Good method ...fast and quick
User avatar
Manager
Manager
Joined: 07 Dec 2010
Posts: 86
Own Kudos [?]: 267 [0]
Given Kudos: 12
Concentration: Marketing, General Management
Send PM
Re: 650 plus level question [#permalink]
can u please explain the same with the help of diagram..
User avatar
Manager
Manager
Joined: 04 Apr 2010
Posts: 91
Own Kudos [?]: 608 [1]
Given Kudos: 31
Send PM
Re: 650 plus level question [#permalink]
1
Kudos
960*965*2/(1000*2000) = 93.04%
B.
User avatar
Current Student
Joined: 26 May 2005
Posts: 356
Own Kudos [?]: 566 [1]
Given Kudos: 13
Send PM
Re: 650 plus level question [#permalink]
1
Bookmarks
okai .. its C

rectangle of 1000*2000

1000-2*20 = 960
(2000-2*20-30)/2 = 965
2 squares = 2*965*960/(1000*2000) = 93% approx.
User avatar
Retired Moderator
Joined: 20 Dec 2010
Posts: 1114
Own Kudos [?]: 4702 [4]
Given Kudos: 376
Send PM
Re: 650 plus level question [#permalink]
3
Kudos
1
Bookmarks
ruturaj wrote:
A farmer has a field that measures 1000 ft wide by 2000 ft long. There is an untillable strip 20 ft wide on the inside edge of the field, and a 30 ft wide untillable strip bisects the field into two squares (approximate). Approximately what percentage of the field is tillable?

A) 98%

B) 93%

C) 91%

D) 90%

E) 88%


Total Area = 1000*2000
Tillable Square's side horizontally = (2000-20-30-20)/2 = 1930/2 = 965
Tillable Square's side vertically = (1000-20-20) = 960 = 960

Consider it as 960:
\(% = \frac{2*960*960}{1000*2000}*100=\frac{2*0.96*0.96*1}{2}*100=(0.96)^2*100=92.16 \approx 93%\)

Why approximated to 93 and not 91 because we shortened one side from 965 to 960. Thus, in reality the squares are bigger.

Ans: "B"

By the way, I looked up tillable after solving.

tillable: arable, cultivable, cultivatable

Attachment:
tillable_field.PNG
tillable_field.PNG [ 5.2 KiB | Viewed 9066 times ]
User avatar
Manager
Manager
Joined: 08 Jan 2011
Status:==GMAT Ninja==
Posts: 149
Own Kudos [?]: 217 [2]
Given Kudos: 46
Schools:ISB, IIMA ,SP Jain , XLRI
 Q48  V24 GMAT 2: 610  Q48  V27
WE 1: Aditya Birla Group (sales)
WE 2: Saint Gobain Group (sales)
Send PM
Re: 650 plus level question [#permalink]
2
Kudos
fluke wrote:
ruturaj wrote:
A farmer has a field that measures 1000 ft wide by 2000 ft long. There is an untillable strip 20 ft wide on the inside edge of the field, and a 30 ft wide untillable strip bisects the field into two squares (approximate). Approximately what percentage of the field is tillable?

A) 98%

B) 93%

C) 91%

D) 90%

E) 88%


Total Area = 1000*2000
Tillable Square's side horizontally = (2000-20-30-20)/2 = 1930/2 = 965
Tillable Square's side vertically = (1000-20-20) = 960 = 960

Consider it as 960:
\(% = \frac{2*960*960}{1000*2000}*100=\frac{2*0.96*0.96*1}{2}*100=(0.96)^2*100=92.16 \approx 93%\)

Why approximated to 93 and not 91 because we shortened one side from 965 to 960. Thus, in reality the squares are bigger.

Ans: "B"

By the way, I looked up tillable after solving.

tillable: arable, cultivable, cultivatable

Attachment:
tillable_field.PNG


this was quite smart fluke

kudos from me
User avatar
Manager
Manager
Joined: 16 Mar 2011
Posts: 117
Own Kudos [?]: 132 [1]
Given Kudos: 13
Send PM
Re: 650 plus level question [#permalink]
Guys, seriously.. If I would get this question on the actual exam I would seriously start crying or something.. Pfff it took me 30minutes to friggin understand what the question is about... Sigh..
Manager
Manager
Joined: 16 May 2011
Posts: 240
Own Kudos [?]: 308 [0]
Given Kudos: 64
Concentration: Finance, Real Estate
GMAT Date: 12-27-2011
WE:Law (Law)
Send PM
Re: 650 plus level question [#permalink]
i just summed the differences:

20*1000+20*1980+20*980+20*1960 will be the frame. the bisector will be 30* 960 (which can be considered as 20*960 for approximation, remembering that the rounding can cost only 1/2 %)

20*(1980+1960+1000+980+2*960)/2000*1000=the rest is simple and got 7%(+-)which must be substracted from 100

must admit it took me 2 minutes+ to solve
User avatar
Manager
Manager
Joined: 28 Jan 2011
Posts: 63
Own Kudos [?]: 667 [0]
Given Kudos: 76
Location: Tennessee
Concentration: MBA-Entrepreneurship
Schools:Belmont University
 Q25  V25 GMAT 2: 420  Q23  V24
GPA: 3.0
Send PM
Re: 650 plus level question [#permalink]
Shalom!
Please tell me that this type of question is not in the 600 to 700 level question range on the GMAT.
User avatar
Manager
Manager
Joined: 16 Mar 2011
Posts: 117
Own Kudos [?]: 132 [0]
Given Kudos: 13
Send PM
Re: 650 plus level question [#permalink]
Lol, I was REALLY thinking the same thing! I'm afraid it is :(
User avatar
Manager
Manager
Joined: 28 Jan 2011
Posts: 63
Own Kudos [?]: 667 [0]
Given Kudos: 76
Location: Tennessee
Concentration: MBA-Entrepreneurship
Schools:Belmont University
 Q25  V25 GMAT 2: 420  Q23  V24
GPA: 3.0
Send PM
Re: 650 plus level question [#permalink]
Shalom!
I have a question. If I can expect to see this type of question in the 600 to 700 range then how do I prepare to calculate the answer without the use of a calculator?
User avatar
Non-Human User
Joined: 09 Sep 2013
Posts: 32678
Own Kudos [?]: 822 [0]
Given Kudos: 0
Send PM
Re: A farmer has a field that measures 1000 ft wide by 2000 ft l [#permalink]
Hello from the GMAT Club BumpBot!

Thanks to another GMAT Club member, I have just discovered this valuable topic, yet it had no discussion for over a year. I am now bumping it up - doing my job. I think you may find it valuable (esp those replies with Kudos).

Want to see all other topics I dig out? Follow me (click follow button on profile). You will receive a summary of all topics I bump in your profile area as well as via email.
GMAT Club Bot
Re: A farmer has a field that measures 1000 ft wide by 2000 ft l [#permalink]
Moderators:
Math Expert
92929 posts
Senior Moderator - Masters Forum
3137 posts

Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group | Emoji artwork provided by EmojiOne