Last visit was: 26 Apr 2024, 08:05 It is currently 26 Apr 2024, 08:05

Close
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Close
Request Expert Reply
Confirm Cancel
SORT BY:
Date
Tags:
Show Tags
Hide Tags
Math Expert
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Posts: 92940
Own Kudos [?]: 619180 [6]
Given Kudos: 81609
Send PM
Intern
Intern
Joined: 05 Jul 2018
Posts: 34
Own Kudos [?]: 9 [1]
Given Kudos: 23
Location: India
Schools: ISB '21 (A)
GMAT 1: 710 Q49 V37
GPA: 3.47
Send PM
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
Joined: 05 Jan 2019
Posts: 474
Own Kudos [?]: 342 [0]
Given Kudos: 28
Send PM
Current Student
Joined: 24 Nov 2021
Posts: 39
Own Kudos [?]: 15 [0]
Given Kudos: 92
Location: Argentina
Schools: ESADE (A)
Send PM
Re: Studies of the reliability of eyewitness identifications show little [#permalink]
jaisonsunny77 wrote:
Type: Find the assumption

Conclusion: police officers are advised to disallow suspect lineups in which witnesses can hear one another identifying suspects.


Supporting premises: A change in the witnesses' confidence has little or no correlation with the accuracy of the eyewitness account.

In other words, we need to find a reason why the police officers were given that piece of advice.

A. The confidence people have in what they remember having seen is affected by their awareness of what other people claim to have seen. - what (A) essentially implies is that ''external influence'' affects the confidence of the witnesses over the ''accuracy'' of their own accounts. This helps explain why the officers were advised to discontinue suspect lineups in which eye witnesses could hear one another (i.e. expose themselves to ''external influence'') as they identified a suspect. Therefore, (A) is the right answer choice.
B. Unless an eyewitness is confronted with more than one suspect at a time, the accuracy of his or her statements cannot be trusted.
- out of scope.
C. If several eyewitnesses all identify the same suspect in a lineup, it is more likely that the suspect committed the crime than if only one eyewitness identifies the suspect.
- out of scope.
D. Police officers are more interested in the confidence witnesses have when testifying than in the accuracy of that testimony.
- this is not implied in the passage in any way. Besides, (D) does not help us establish why one should regard the conclusion as true.
E. The accuracy of an eyewitness account is doubtful if the eyewitness contradicts what other eyewitnesses claim to have seen. - ''contradiction'' of statements is not considered (out of scope) in this passage.



Hi jaisonsunny77, Bunuel, I'm not clear why A is the correct answer choice.

The statement says "Certain factors can increase or undermine a witness's confidence without altering the accuracy of the identification". Isn't this supporting the fact that "external influence" does not have any relevance as it wouldn't compromise the accuracy of the outcome when eyewitnessing?

Thanks!
GMAT Club Bot
Re: Studies of the reliability of eyewitness identifications show little [#permalink]
Moderators:
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
6921 posts
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
238 posts
CR Forum Moderator
832 posts

Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group | Emoji artwork provided by EmojiOne