Last visit was: 26 Apr 2024, 15:41 It is currently 26 Apr 2024, 15:41

Close
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Close
Request Expert Reply
Confirm Cancel
SORT BY:
Date
Tags:
Show Tags
Hide Tags
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
Joined: 08 Dec 2015
Posts: 258
Own Kudos [?]: 117 [0]
Given Kudos: 36
GMAT 1: 600 Q44 V27
Send PM
Magoosh GMAT Instructor
Joined: 28 Dec 2011
Posts: 4452
Own Kudos [?]: 28575 [4]
Given Kudos: 130
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
Joined: 08 Dec 2015
Posts: 258
Own Kudos [?]: 117 [0]
Given Kudos: 36
GMAT 1: 600 Q44 V27
Send PM
Manager
Manager
Joined: 17 May 2015
Posts: 200
Own Kudos [?]: 3019 [0]
Given Kudos: 85
Send PM
Re: Two variables - two equations trap [#permalink]
mikemcgarry wrote:
iliavko wrote:
Hi everyone!

I get confused when it comes to applying the "we need two different equations to solve for a variable" rule.

Can you please give an example when just having one eq with two variables is enough to solve?

Thank you!

Dear iliavko,

I'm happy to respond. :-)

I will distinguish three cases:
Case I: one equation enough to solve
Case II: two equations needed to solve
Case III: two equations not enough to solve for two variables
I point out that Case II is statistically the most common case, and most often tested. That's the rule, but there are exceptions.

Case I only happens when the question is asking not for the value of x or the value of y, but simply for the value of some expression. Here's a very simple example. Suppose the question is "What is the value of y - x?" Suppose we are given the single equation 2y - x = 28 + x. We could rearrange that equation to solve for the desired expression, which equals 14, despite the fact that we cannot find the individual values of the variables.

Case II happens when we have two different equations that represent two lines with different slope. Any two lines in the x-y plane that have different slopes will intersect at exactly one and only one (x, y) point. That determines a unique and unambiguous solution.

Case III happens when the two lines have the same slope. For example:
Equation #1: x - 2y = 5
Equation #2: 4y + 6 = 2x
It's not necessarily obvious at first glance, but if you were to re-write these both in y = mx + b form, you would see that they have the same slope. If you try to solve them, you will get mathematical nonsense. In fact, they are parallel lines, and they never intersect, so there's no solution.
A variant on this case:
Equation #1: 3x + 2y = 5
Equation #2: 4x = 10 - 6y
This what mathematicians call a "degenerate system," because the two equations are really one equation in two different forms. Here, we can't solve, because absolutely every value that works in equation #1 will work in equation #2 as well, because they're the same equation! This has a continuous infinity of possible solutions, which in practice, is equivalent to having no solution.

Does all this make sense?
Mike :-)

Hi,

Thank you very much, Mike, for such a nice explanation.

I would like to add one more variant of Case1:

Case I: one equation enough to solve

In some question, we have inherent integrality condition. In such cases, it may be possible to answer the question with one equation itself.

Please refer the following question:

https://gmatclub.com/forum/max-has-125- ... 40249.html

Thanks.
Intern
Intern
Joined: 26 Dec 2016
Posts: 9
Own Kudos [?]: 8 [1]
Given Kudos: 13
Send PM
Re: Two variables - two equations trap [#permalink]
1
Kudos
mikemcgarry wrote:
iliavko wrote:
Hi everyone!

I get confused when it comes to applying the "we need two different equations to solve for a variable" rule.

Can you please give an example when just having one eq with two variables is enough to solve?

Thank you!

Dear iliavko,

I'm happy to respond. :-)

I will distinguish three cases:
Case I: one equation enough to solve
Case II: two equations needed to solve
Case III: two equations not enough to solve for two variables
I point out that Case II is statistically the most common case, and most often tested. That's the rule, but there are exceptions.

Case I only happens when the question is asking not for the value of x or the value of y, but simply for the value of some expression. Here's a very simple example. Suppose the question is "What is the value of y - x?" Suppose we are given the single equation 2y - x = 28 + x. We could rearrange that equation to solve for the desired expression, which equals 14, despite the fact that we cannot find the individual values of the variables.

Case II happens when we have two different equations that represent two lines with different slope. Any two lines in the x-y plane that have different slopes will intersect at exactly one and only one (x, y) point. That determines a unique and unambiguous solution.

Case III happens when the two lines have the same slope. For example:
Equation #1: x - 2y = 5
Equation #2: 4y + 6 = 2x
It's not necessarily obvious at first glance, but if you were to re-write these both in y = mx + b form, you would see that they have the same slope. If you try to solve them, you will get mathematical nonsense. In fact, they are parallel lines, and they never intersect, so there's no solution.
A variant on this case:
Equation #1: 3x + 2y = 5
Equation #2: 4x = 10 - 6y

This what mathematicians call a "degenerate system," because the two equations are really one equation in two different forms. Here, we can't solve, because absolutely every value that works in equation #1 will work in equation #2 as well, because they're the same equation! This has a continuous infinity of possible solutions, which in practice, is equivalent to having no solution.

Does all this make sense?
Mike :-)


Hi,

thanks for your explanation. I think there is a small typo.
I guess the highlited part should be :
I) 3x + 2y = 5
II) 6x = 10 - 4y
Tutor
Joined: 16 Oct 2010
Posts: 14831
Own Kudos [?]: 64940 [0]
Given Kudos: 427
Location: Pune, India
Send PM
Two variables - two equations trap [#permalink]
Expert Reply
iliavko wrote:
Hi everyone!

I get confused when it comes to applying the "we need two different equations to solve for a variable" rule.

Can you please give an example when just having one eq with two variables is enough to solve?

Thank you!



Check: https://anaprep.com/algebra-integer-sol ... variables/

Originally posted by KarishmaB on 16 Feb 2017, 08:58.
Last edited by KarishmaB on 09 Aug 2023, 03:41, edited 2 times in total.
User avatar
Non-Human User
Joined: 09 Sep 2013
Posts: 32689
Own Kudos [?]: 822 [0]
Given Kudos: 0
Send PM
Re: System of equations, solving for two unknown variables. [#permalink]
Hello from the GMAT Club BumpBot!

Thanks to another GMAT Club member, I have just discovered this valuable topic, yet it had no discussion for over a year. I am now bumping it up - doing my job. I think you may find it valuable (esp those replies with Kudos).

Want to see all other topics I dig out? Follow me (click follow button on profile). You will receive a summary of all topics I bump in your profile area as well as via email.
GMAT Club Bot
Re: System of equations, solving for two unknown variables. [#permalink]
Moderator:
Math Expert
92948 posts

Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group | Emoji artwork provided by EmojiOne