Last visit was: 26 Apr 2024, 08:22 It is currently 26 Apr 2024, 08:22

Close
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Close
Request Expert Reply
Confirm Cancel
User avatar
Manager
Manager
Joined: 05 Oct 2008
Posts: 160
Own Kudos [?]: 3546 [0]
Given Kudos: 22
Send PM
User avatar
Director
Director
Joined: 07 Nov 2007
Posts: 718
Own Kudos [?]: 3077 [0]
Given Kudos: 5
Location: New York
Send PM
User avatar
Director
Director
Joined: 17 Jun 2008
Posts: 614
Own Kudos [?]: 444 [0]
Given Kudos: 0
Send PM
User avatar
Director
Director
Joined: 07 Nov 2007
Posts: 718
Own Kudos [?]: 3077 [0]
Given Kudos: 5
Location: New York
Send PM
Re: Those skeptical of the extent of global warming argue that [#permalink]
scthakur wrote:
I will go for A. I think "divided on" is a correct idiom (not sure though). Moreover, past tense "would" is not required as it is in E.


IMO,
"divded on"/"dived over" both are correct idioms.


I chose E because..
whether significant warming will occur and what impact would have -->
conveys the following meaning..
whether siginicant warming will occur or not.? "if occured.. what impact it would have?"

Also in A..
"what impact will it have if it does" --> sounds little akward.

"what impact it will have if it does" --> sound better.

What is OA?
What is Source?
What is OE if available
User avatar
Director
Director
Joined: 17 Jun 2008
Posts: 614
Own Kudos [?]: 444 [0]
Given Kudos: 0
Send PM
Re: Those skeptical of the extent of global warming argue that [#permalink]
I think the conditional statement in option A has the correct structure as below.

"if + present tense + then (optional) + future tense".

past "would" in option E is not required.

Awaiting OA and OE.
User avatar
Director
Director
Joined: 07 Nov 2007
Posts: 718
Own Kudos [?]: 3077 [0]
Given Kudos: 5
Location: New York
Send PM
Re: Those skeptical of the extent of global warming argue that [#permalink]
scthakur wrote:
I think the conditional statement in option A has the correct structure as below.

"if + present tense + then (optional) + future tense".

past "would" in option E is not required.

Awaiting OA and OE.


thats why I had tough time choosing between A and E.

if it has "what impact it will have if it does" --> then definitely I would have gone for A.

If I fly to New York, I will visit Empire State building. --> correct
If I fly to New York, will I visit Empire State building. --> is this sounds good?
are you asking question..

That's the only reason I rejected A..
avatar
Intern
Intern
Joined: 17 Dec 2008
Posts: 13
Own Kudos [?]: 4 [0]
Given Kudos: 0
Send PM
Re: Those skeptical of the extent of global warming argue that [#permalink]
I would say E

Idiom, it is 'divided over' not 'divided on'
User avatar
Director
Director
Joined: 17 Jun 2008
Posts: 614
Own Kudos [?]: 444 [0]
Given Kudos: 0
Send PM
Re: Those skeptical of the extent of global warming argue that [#permalink]
llcooljayce wrote:
I would say E

Idiom, it is 'divided over' not 'divided on'


Thanks for the clarification. I think, this clearly makes E a correct option.
User avatar
Manager
Manager
Joined: 27 May 2008
Posts: 70
Own Kudos [?]: 278 [0]
Given Kudos: 0
Send PM
Re: Those skeptical of the extent of global warming argue that [#permalink]
study wrote:
Those skeptical of the extent of global warming argue that short-term temperature data are an inadequate means of predicting long-term trends and point out that the scientific community remains divided on whether significant warming will occur and what impact will it have if it does.

A. on whether significant warming will occur and what impact will it have if it does.

B. on whether warming that occurs will be significant and the impact it would have.

C. as to whether significant warming will occur or the impact it would have if it did.

D. over whether there will be significant warming or the impact it will have.

E. over whether significant warming will occur and what impact it would have



Agree with E

Agrees with subjunctive, if significant warming will occur then what impact it would have

depends on/over can be used as idiom.

A - has redundancy issue.
(whether significant warming will occur and if it does.)
User avatar
Director
Director
Joined: 07 Nov 2007
Posts: 718
Own Kudos [?]: 3077 [0]
Given Kudos: 5
Location: New York
Send PM
Re: Those skeptical of the extent of global warming argue that [#permalink]
scthakur wrote:
llcooljayce wrote:
I would say E

Idiom, it is 'divided over' not 'divided on'


Thanks for the clarification. I think, this clearly makes E a correct option.



I don't agree with that:
both are correct idioms.

DIVIDED ON: (Below sentences are from NY TIMES)
-----------
In the United States, media specialists are divided on whether the government could or should help the efforts.

Arab leaders remain cripplingly divided on how to respond to the crisis

I made this decision because Jeff and I were really divided on the future of this program and what we wanted from the program

DIVIDED OVER:(Below sentences are from NY TIMES)
-------------
“Republicans are divided over how aggressively to take on Obama.

Opinions will surely be divided over the exotically ornate costumes designed expressly for Ms. Fleming by Christian Lacroix



Below is from Merriam-Webster Dictionary
divided
Function:
adjective
Meaning:
1 [more divided; most divided] : separated by different opinions : in a state of disagreement ▪ Experts are sharply divided on/over the issue. ▪ The issue has created a deeply divided nation.
2 : given to two or more people or things rather than to just one person or thing ▪ She feels like she only gets her mother's divided attention. ▪ He has divided loyalties. [=he is trying to be loyal to opposing groups, ideals, etc.]
User avatar
Manager
Manager
Joined: 02 Nov 2008
Posts: 163
Own Kudos [?]: 463 [0]
Given Kudos: 2
Send PM
Re: Those skeptical of the extent of global warming argue that [#permalink]
x2suresh wrote:
study wrote:
Those skeptical of the extent of global warming argue that short-term temperature data are an inadequate means of predicting long-term trends and point out that the scientific community remains divided on whether significant warming will occur and what impact will it have if it does.

A. on whether significant warming will occur and what impact will it have if it does.

B. on whether warming that occurs will be significant and the impact it would have.

C. as to whether significant warming will occur or the impact it would have if it did.

D. over whether there will be significant warming or the impact it will have.

E. over whether significant warming will occur and what impact it would have


we need "and' instead of "or"
C,D -- out
"whether warming that occurs .." not || "the impact it would have"
B - out

between A and E.
had dificulty choosing between A and E
Finally chose E


A is also a bit wordy and that's why I chose E.
GMAT Tutor
Joined: 24 Jun 2008
Posts: 4128
Own Kudos [?]: 9247 [0]
Given Kudos: 91
 Q51  V47
Send PM
Re: Those skeptical of the extent of global warming argue that [#permalink]
Expert Reply
The answer should be E). A) shouldn't be right:

"on whether significant warming will occur and what impact will it have if it does."

The end of the sentence is phrased as a question, with the verb ('will') before the subject ('it'). For A) to have any chance of being correct, it would need to read "and what impact it will have if it does". A) has other problems as well, but this one is the clincher for me.
User avatar
Manager
Manager
Joined: 05 Oct 2008
Posts: 160
Own Kudos [?]: 3546 [0]
Given Kudos: 22
Send PM
Re: Those skeptical of the extent of global warming argue that [#permalink]
I do not have the OA on this one. Only had the question!
avatar
Intern
Intern
Joined: 17 Dec 2008
Posts: 13
Own Kudos [?]: 4 [0]
Given Kudos: 0
Send PM
Re: Those skeptical of the extent of global warming argue that [#permalink]
Are you freaking kidding me? How does this help ANYONE?
GMAT Tutor
Joined: 24 Jun 2008
Posts: 4128
Own Kudos [?]: 9247 [0]
Given Kudos: 91
 Q51  V47
Send PM
Re: Those skeptical of the extent of global warming argue that [#permalink]
Expert Reply
Google is helpful if you need an OA - just searched, and the OA is E. The question is from GMATPrep.
User avatar
Retired Moderator
Joined: 18 Jul 2008
Posts: 524
Own Kudos [?]: 1850 [0]
Given Kudos: 5
GMAT 2: 670
Send PM
Re: Those skeptical of the extent of global warming argue that [#permalink]
Now now, found a good explanation here:
https://www.manhattangmat.com/forums/th ... t1938.html

The OA is E.


llcooljayce wrote:
Are you freaking kidding me? How does this help ANYONE?




Archived Topic
Hi there,
This topic has been closed and archived due to inactivity or violation of community quality standards. No more replies are possible here.
Where to now? Join ongoing discussions on thousands of quality questions in our Sentence Correction (EA only) Forum
Still interested in this question? Check out the "Best Topics" block above for a better discussion on this exact question, as well as several more related questions.
Thank you for understanding, and happy exploring!
GMAT Club Bot
Re: Those skeptical of the extent of global warming argue that [#permalink]
Moderators:
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
6921 posts
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
238 posts
Current Student
278 posts

Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group | Emoji artwork provided by EmojiOne