Last visit was: 19 Nov 2025, 01:15 It is currently 19 Nov 2025, 01:15
Close
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Close
Request Expert Reply
Confirm Cancel
805+ Level|   Graphs|   Math Related|         
User avatar
parkhydel
Joined: 03 Jun 2019
Last visit: 27 Mar 2025
Posts: 273
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 60
Posts: 273
Kudos: 20,392
 [118]
6
Kudos
Add Kudos
112
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Most Helpful Reply
User avatar
egmat
User avatar
e-GMAT Representative
Joined: 02 Nov 2011
Last visit: 18 Nov 2025
Posts: 5,108
Own Kudos:
32,884
 [19]
Given Kudos: 700
GMAT Date: 08-19-2020
Expert
Expert reply
Active GMAT Club Expert! Tag them with @ followed by their username for a faster response.
Posts: 5,108
Kudos: 32,884
 [19]
17
Kudos
Add Kudos
2
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
KarishmaB
Joined: 16 Oct 2010
Last visit: 18 Nov 2025
Posts: 16,267
Own Kudos:
76,986
 [10]
Given Kudos: 482
Location: Pune, India
Expert
Expert reply
Active GMAT Club Expert! Tag them with @ followed by their username for a faster response.
Posts: 16,267
Kudos: 76,986
 [10]
5
Kudos
Add Kudos
5
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
chetan2u
User avatar
GMAT Expert
Joined: 02 Aug 2009
Last visit: 15 Nov 2025
Posts: 11,238
Own Kudos:
43,699
 [3]
Given Kudos: 335
Status:Math and DI Expert
Location: India
Concentration: Human Resources, General Management
GMAT Focus 1: 735 Q90 V89 DI81
Products:
Expert
Expert reply
GMAT Focus 1: 735 Q90 V89 DI81
Posts: 11,238
Kudos: 43,699
 [3]
2
Kudos
Add Kudos
1
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
ckavya2691, refer your query on the question

There are 60 employees. Manager - 6; FT - 18 and PT - 36
Let each PT work for x hours, so FT will work for 2x hours.

The ratio = 18*2x:36*x = 1:1

However, this has to be changed to 2:3 by changing the number of employees.
Clearly, number of hours worked increases for PT / decreases for FT, so their PT has to be increased / FTcould be increased/decreased depending on the increase in PT.

Increase in PT:
2: 38, so number of hours = 38x....Ratio \(38x*\frac{2}{3}:38x­\).....NUmber of hours for FT is not an integer and options are in integer.
4: 40, so number of hours = 40x....Ratio \(40x*\frac{2}{3}:40x­\).....NUmber of hours for FT is not an integer and options are in integer.
6: 42, So number of hours = 42x....Ratio \(42x*\frac{2}{3}:42x = 28x:42x = 14*2x:42*x­\).....Thus, increase by 6, 36 to 42, and a simultaneous decrease of 18-14 or 4 would give a ratio 2:3.

Solution
A. Decrease by 4
B. Increase by 6
General Discussion
User avatar
Bisleri
Joined: 22 Dec 2023
Last visit: 04 Oct 2025
Posts: 79
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 35
GMAT Focus 1: 645 Q84 V83 DI79
GMAT Focus 2: 685 Q90 V83 DI79
GMAT Focus 2: 685 Q90 V83 DI79
Posts: 79
Kudos: 42
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
chetan2u
ckavya2691, refer your query on the question

There are 60 employees. Manager - 6; FT - 18 and PT - 36
Let each PT work for x hours, so FT will work for 2x hours.

The ratio = 18*2x:36*x = 1:1

However, this has to be changed to 2:3 by changing the number of employees.
Clearly, number of hours worked increases for PT / decreases for FT, so their PT has to be increased / FTcould be increased/decreased depending on the increase in PT.

Increase in PT:
2: 38, so number of hours = 38x....Ratio \(38x*\frac{2}{3}:38x­\).....NUmber of hours for FT is not an integer and options are in integer.
4: 40, so number of hours = 40x....Ratio \(40x*\frac{2}{3}:40x­\).....NUmber of hours for FT is not an integer and options are in integer.
6: 42, So number of hours = 42x....Ratio \(42x*\frac{2}{3}:42x = 28x:42x = 14*2x:42*x­\).....Thus, increase by 6, 36 to 42, and a simultaneous decrease of 18-14 or 4 would give a ratio 2:3.

Solution
A. Decrease by 4
B. Increase by 6
­As per the Question - "and wants to achieve this ratio without changing the number of managers or the number of hours each manager works per week"

Therefore, the Decrease in the number of FTs should be equal to the increase in no of PTs.

On solving, Decrease and Increase come to 4.5 Each, which is not possible

IMO All options are wrong
User avatar
chetan2u
User avatar
GMAT Expert
Joined: 02 Aug 2009
Last visit: 15 Nov 2025
Posts: 11,238
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 335
Status:Math and DI Expert
Location: India
Concentration: Human Resources, General Management
GMAT Focus 1: 735 Q90 V89 DI81
Products:
Expert
Expert reply
GMAT Focus 1: 735 Q90 V89 DI81
Posts: 11,238
Kudos: 43,699
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
ABHIJITPAL

chetan2u
ckavya2691, refer your query on the question

There are 60 employees. Manager - 6; FT - 18 and PT - 36
Let each PT work for x hours, so FT will work for 2x hours.

The ratio = 18*2x:36*x = 1:1

However, this has to be changed to 2:3 by changing the number of employees.
Clearly, number of hours worked increases for PT / decreases for FT, so their PT has to be increased / FTcould be increased/decreased depending on the increase in PT.

Increase in PT:
2: 38, so number of hours = 38x....Ratio \(38x*\frac{2}{3}:38x­\).....NUmber of hours for FT is not an integer and options are in integer.
4: 40, so number of hours = 40x....Ratio \(40x*\frac{2}{3}:40x­\).....NUmber of hours for FT is not an integer and options are in integer.
6: 42, So number of hours = 42x....Ratio \(42x*\frac{2}{3}:42x = 28x:42x = 14*2x:42*x­\).....Thus, increase by 6, 36 to 42, and a simultaneous decrease of 18-14 or 4 would give a ratio 2:3.

Solution
A. Decrease by 4
B. Increase by 6
­As per the Question - "and wants to achieve this ratio without changing the number of managers or the number of hours each manager works per week"

Therefore, the Decrease in the number of FTs should be equal to the increase in no of PTs.

On solving, Decrease and Increase come to 4.5 Each, which is not possible

IMO All options are wrong
­The question nowhere mentions that the number of employees has to be constant.

It says that the number of hours manager works should not change, and number of hours for FT and PT is related to the number of hours manager works.
You can only change the number of FT and PT to get the ratio.
User avatar
Oppenheimer1945
Joined: 16 Jul 2019
Last visit: 14 Nov 2025
Posts: 784
Own Kudos:
639
 [2]
Given Kudos: 223
Location: India
GMAT Focus 1: 645 Q90 V76 DI80
GPA: 7.81
2
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
ft=18 (2h hrs)
pt=36 (h hrs)

2/3=2(18+x)/(36+y)

(18+x)/(36+y)=1/3

as 18/36 is 1/2 >1/3

lets reduce Num in steps. red by 2 should have denom of 42 (inc by 6)­
User avatar
ruis
Joined: 17 Sep 2023
Last visit: 03 Nov 2024
Posts: 136
Own Kudos:
664
 [5]
Given Kudos: 528
Posts: 136
Kudos: 664
 [5]
4
Kudos
Add Kudos
1
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Official answer:


Does anyone have a different approach to this question? other than the already discussed or the official?­
Attachment:
GMAT-Club-Forum-qfrjtvdv.png
GMAT-Club-Forum-qfrjtvdv.png [ 73.16 KiB | Viewed 3983 times ]
User avatar
chetan2u
User avatar
GMAT Expert
Joined: 02 Aug 2009
Last visit: 15 Nov 2025
Posts: 11,238
Own Kudos:
43,699
 [1]
Given Kudos: 335
Status:Math and DI Expert
Location: India
Concentration: Human Resources, General Management
GMAT Focus 1: 735 Q90 V89 DI81
Products:
Expert
Expert reply
GMAT Focus 1: 735 Q90 V89 DI81
Posts: 11,238
Kudos: 43,699
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
ruis, another logical approach would be

The ratio of working hours that we want FT:PT to be is 2:3
As PT works half time, we require half the number of FT to do same work. Thus, converting the ratio to number of FT people : number of PT people = 2/2 : 3 or 1:3

Knowing this, we now know that earlier ratio of 30%:60% or 1:2 has to be brought down to 1:3.
Clearly FT has to be reduced and PT increased.

Initially, FT people = 30% of 60 or 18 and 60% of 60 or 36
Decrease: by(2,4,6) means (18-2,18-4,18-6) or (16,14,12)…..(I)
Increase: by(2,4,6) means (36+2,36+4,36+6) or (38,40,42)…..(II)

Now find a number in I and II that give you a ratio 1:3 => 14:42 is the answer
User avatar
ruis
Joined: 17 Sep 2023
Last visit: 03 Nov 2024
Posts: 136
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 528
Posts: 136
Kudos: 664
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Are there similar questions (PS, DI or DS) to practice where we go from initial an ratio to a different final ratio? Bunuel
User avatar
colfer
Joined: 16 Mar 2024
Last visit: 03 Jun 2024
Posts: 15
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 1
Posts: 15
Kudos: 6
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
­
Attachment:
GMAT-Club-Forum-kznx5q1x.png
GMAT-Club-Forum-kznx5q1x.png [ 403.07 KiB | Viewed 3961 times ]
User avatar
playthegame
User avatar
Johnson Moderator
Joined: 19 Jan 2024
Last visit: 28 Mar 2025
Posts: 423
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 146
Location: Canada
Concentration: Operations, Leadership
Schools: Johnson '27
Products:
Schools: Johnson '27
Posts: 423
Kudos: 635
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Official Explanation

Apply
Let a represent the change in the number of FT employees, each of whom works x hours per week, and let b represent the change in the number of PT employees, each of whom works ​x over 2​ hours per week. Since 30% of the 60 employees are FT, 18 employees are FT. Since 60% of the 60 employees are PT, 36 employees are PT. The ratio ​total number of hours worked by FT employees over total number of hours worked by PT employees​ needs to be 2:3. It follows that

​open paren 18 plus a close paren times x over open paren 36 plus b close paren times open paren x over 2 close paren​

=
​two thirds​

3(18 + a)(x)

=
2(36 + b) ​open paren x over 2 close paren​

54 + 3a

=
36 + b

18

=
b − 3a

a

=
​the fraction with numerator 18 minus b and denominator negative 3​

In order for a to be an integer, 18 − b must be divisible by 3, from which it follows that b must be divisible by 3. The only number given in the answer choices that is divisible by 3 is 6 so b = 6 and a = ​the fraction with numerator 18 minus 6 and denominator negative 3​ = −4.

RO1: Apply
Since a = −4, the number of FT employees must be decreased by 4.

The correct answer is decrease by 4.

RO2: Apply
Since b = 6, the number of PT employees must be increased by 6.

The correct answer is increase by 6.
User avatar
Gemmie
Joined: 19 Dec 2021
Last visit: 18 Nov 2025
Posts: 491
Own Kudos:
427
 [2]
Given Kudos: 76
Location: Viet Nam
Concentration: Technology, Economics
GMAT Focus 1: 695 Q87 V84 DI83
GPA: 3.55
GMAT Focus 1: 695 Q87 V84 DI83
Posts: 491
Kudos: 427
 [2]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
1
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
­2x: number of hours that a FT person works per week
x: number of hours that a PT person works per week

a: change in number of FT persons
b: change in number of PT persons

From the pie chart => PT = 36; FT = 18

\(\frac{(18 + a) * 2x}{(36 + b) * x} = \frac{2}{3}\)

=> \(\frac{18 + a}{36+b} = \frac{1}{3}\)

=> 54 + 3a = 36 + b
=> 18 + 3a = b
=> 3 (6 + a) = b
=> b is divisible by 3
=> b is either 6 or -6

If b = 6 => 6 + a = 2 => a = -4
If b = -6 => 6 + a = -2 => a = -8

Therefore, a = -4 and b = 6

To achieve the desired ratio, the store could [decrease by 4] the number of full-time salespeople and [increase by 6] the number of part-time salespeople.­­
User avatar
PeachSnapple1
User avatar
Yale and Darden Moderator
Joined: 17 Mar 2021
Last visit: 15 Nov 2025
Posts: 139
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 1
GMAT 1: 740 Q50 V40
GMAT 1: 740 Q50 V40
Posts: 139
Kudos: 97
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Took me a second try because I had assumed the total number of employees stays unchanged.
Moderators:
Math Expert
105379 posts
496 posts