Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.

It appears that you are browsing the GMAT Club forum unregistered!

Signing up is free, quick, and confidential.
Join other 500,000 members and get the full benefits of GMAT Club

Registration gives you:

Tests

Take 11 tests and quizzes from GMAT Club and leading GMAT prep companies such as Manhattan GMAT,
Knewton, and others. All are free for GMAT Club members.

Applicant Stats

View detailed applicant stats such as GPA, GMAT score, work experience, location, application
status, and more

Books/Downloads

Download thousands of study notes,
question collections, GMAT Club’s
Grammar and Math books.
All are free!

Thank you for using the timer!
We noticed you are actually not timing your practice. Click the START button first next time you use the timer.
There are many benefits to timing your practice, including:

Two squares, each of side lengths 1 unit and having their [#permalink]

Show Tags

14 Sep 2010, 07:27

3

This post received KUDOS

9

This post was BOOKMARKED

00:00

A

B

C

D

E

Difficulty:

95% (hard)

Question Stats:

46% (04:31) correct
54% (03:03) wrong based on 120 sessions

HideShow timer Statistics

Two squares, each of side lengths 1 unit and having their centres at O, are rotated with respect to each other to generate octagon ABCDEFGH, as shown in the figure above. If AB = 43/99, find the area of the octagon.

Two squares, each of side lengths 1 unit and having their centres at O, are rotated with respect to each other to generate octagon ABCDEFGH, as shown in the figure above. If AB = 43/99, find the area of the octagon.

Attachment:

G86.PNG

a. 73/99 b. 86/99 c. 1287/9801 d. 76/99

First note that all the triangles will have the same dimensions. Let the legs of these triangles be \(x\) and \(y\), also we know that the hypotenuse equals to \(\frac{43}{99}\), so \(x^2+y^2=(\frac{43}{99})^2\).

If we take one side of a square we'll see that \(x+y+\frac{43}{99}=1\) --> \(x+y=\frac{56}{99}\) --> square it --> \(x^2+2xy+y^2=(\frac{56}{99})^2\), as from above \(x^2+y^2=(\frac{43}{99})^2\), then: \((\frac{43}{99})^2+2xy=(\frac{56}{99})^2\) --> \(2xy=(\frac{56}{99})^2-(\frac{43}{99})^2=(\frac{56}{99}-\frac{43}{99})(\frac{56}{99}+\frac{43}{99})=\frac{13}{99}*1=\frac{13}{99}\);

Now, the are of the octagon will be area of a square minus area of 4 triangles --> \(area=1-4*(\frac{1}{2}*xy)=1-2xy=1-\frac{13}{99}=\frac{86}{99}\).

EASY WAY is as shown below AREA = .5*base*hiegt = 0.5*43/99 * 1/2 note: i/2 is the hieght as the length of a side of the given square is 1 and half of that is what is the hieght

This doesnt looks like a straight line i dont think i can be 0.5

EASY WAY is as shown below AREA = .5*base*hiegt = 0.5*43/99 * 1/2 note: i/2 is the hieght as the length of a side of the given square is 1 and half of that is what is the hieght

This doesnt looks like a straight line i dont think i can be 0.5

Attachment:

G86.PNG

It is the length of the perpendicular from the center of the square to its side AB. It has to be half the length of the side, hence 1/2. _________________

I dont understand why the solutions remove the area of the four triangles outside the stationary square? Should not the area of octagon add the area of those four triangles rather than subtract? Bunuel ,Shrouded?

Re: Two squares, each of side lengths 1 unit and having their [#permalink]

Show Tags

29 Nov 2013, 06:39

Hello from the GMAT Club BumpBot!

Thanks to another GMAT Club member, I have just discovered this valuable topic, yet it had no discussion for over a year. I am now bumping it up - doing my job. I think you may find it valuable (esp those replies with Kudos).

Want to see all other topics I dig out? Follow me (click follow button on profile). You will receive a summary of all topics I bump in your profile area as well as via email. _________________

Two squares, each of side lengths 1 unit and having their centres at O, are rotated with respect to each other to generate octagon ABCDEFGH, as shown in the figure above. If AB = 43/99, find the area of the octagon.

Attachment:

G86.PNG

a. 73/99 b. 86/99 c. 1287/9801 d. 76/99

First note that all the triangles will have the same dimensions. Let the legs of these triangles be \(x\) and \(y\), also we know that the hypotenuse equals to \(\frac{43}{99}\), so \(x^2+y^2=(\frac{43}{99})^2\).

If we take one side of a square we'll see that \(x+y+\frac{43}{99}=1\) --> \(x+y=\frac{56}{99}\) --> square it --> \(x^2+2xy+y^2=(\frac{56}{99})^2\), as from above \(x^2+y^2=(\frac{43}{99})^2\), then: \((\frac{43}{99})^2+2xy=(\frac{56}{99})^2\) --> \(2xy=(\frac{56}{99})^2-(\frac{43}{99})^2=(\frac{56}{99}-\frac{43}{99})(\frac{56}{99}+\frac{43}{99})=\frac{13}{99}*1=\frac{13}{99}\);

Now, the are of the octagon will be area of a square minus area of 4 triangles --> \(area=1-4*(\frac{1}{2}*xy)=1-2xy=1-\frac{13}{99}=\frac{86}{99}\).

Answer: B.

Is the above question follow the pattern of word problems in GMAT?

Re: Two squares, each of side lengths 1 unit and having their [#permalink]

Show Tags

12 Dec 2013, 12:28

Basically, we have to find the area of the square and the eight triangles that border it.

We are told that measure AB = 43/99. Therefore, we know that measure XA +BZ (see attached diagram) = 56/99. We also know that each triangle formed is a right triangle so we can use the Pythagorean theorem: a^2 + b^2 = c^2 or in this case, a^2 + b^2 = (43/99)^2. Also, keep in mind that the lengths XA + BA are also the leg lengths of the two right triangles.

What we know:

a+b = 56/99 a^2 + b^2 = (43/99)^2

From the first equation, we could isolate a variable to get a=(56/99) - b then plug it into the Pythagorean theorem but that might get messy. Instead, we notice that in both equations we have an a + b: we can square a and b in the first equation to make it easier to substitute into the second equation.

a+b = 56/99 (a+b)^2 = (56/99)^2 a^2 + 2ab + b^2 = (56/99)^2 a^2 + b^2 + 2ab = (56/99)^2 Now we have an equation that can easily plug into the Pythagorean theorem

Clearly I made a mistake here. If I were to square both sides I would get 169/9801 which is much smaller than 13/99. If I were to square (56/99)^2 and (43/99)^2 then reduce, I would get 13/99 but this is far too time consuming for the test. Where did I go wrong with my equation?

Furthermore, why would the area of this square be the square MINUS the area of the triangles? Wouldn't it be the area of the square PLUS the area of the triangles?

Thanks!

Attachments

EXAMPLE SEVEN.png [ 18.91 KiB | Viewed 1907 times ]

Two squares, each of side lengths 1 unit and having their centres at O, are rotated with respect to each other to generate octagon ABCDEFGH, as shown in the figure above. If AB = 43/99, find the area of the octagon.

Attachment:

G86.PNG

a. 73/99 b. 86/99 c. 1287/9801 d. 76/99

First note that all the triangles will have the same dimensions. Let the legs of these triangles be \(x\) and \(y\), also we know that the hypotenuse equals to \(\frac{43}{99}\), so \(x^2+y^2=(\frac{43}{99})^2\).

If we take one side of a square we'll see that \(x+y+\frac{43}{99}=1\) --> \(x+y=\frac{56}{99}\) --> square it --> \(x^2+2xy+y^2=(\frac{56}{99})^2\), as from above \(x^2+y^2=(\frac{43}{99})^2\), then: \((\frac{43}{99})^2+2xy=(\frac{56}{99})^2\) --> \(2xy=(\frac{56}{99})^2-(\frac{43}{99})^2=(\frac{56}{99}-\frac{43}{99})(\frac{56}{99}+\frac{43}{99})=\frac{13}{99}*1=\frac{13}{99}\);

Now, the are of the octagon will be area of a square minus area of 4 triangles --> \(area=1-4*(\frac{1}{2}*xy)=1-2xy=1-\frac{13}{99}=\frac{86}{99}\).

Answer: B.

hi Banuel. I can't understand why I should subtract the four triangles when it seems that I should add them to the area of the square. Please explain. Thanks.

Two squares, each of side lengths 1 unit and having their centres at O, are rotated with respect to each other to generate octagon ABCDEFGH, as shown in the figure above. If AB = 43/99, find the area of the octagon.

Attachment:

The attachment G86.PNG is no longer available

a. 73/99 b. 86/99 c. 1287/9801 d. 76/99

First note that all the triangles will have the same dimensions. Let the legs of these triangles be \(x\) and \(y\), also we know that the hypotenuse equals to \(\frac{43}{99}\), so \(x^2+y^2=(\frac{43}{99})^2\).

If we take one side of a square we'll see that \(x+y+\frac{43}{99}=1\) --> \(x+y=\frac{56}{99}\) --> square it --> \(x^2+2xy+y^2=(\frac{56}{99})^2\), as from above \(x^2+y^2=(\frac{43}{99})^2\), then: \((\frac{43}{99})^2+2xy=(\frac{56}{99})^2\) --> \(2xy=(\frac{56}{99})^2-(\frac{43}{99})^2=(\frac{56}{99}-\frac{43}{99})(\frac{56}{99}+\frac{43}{99})=\frac{13}{99}*1=\frac{13}{99}\);

Now, the are of the octagon will be area of a square minus area of 4 triangles --> \(area=1-4*(\frac{1}{2}*xy)=1-2xy=1-\frac{13}{99}=\frac{86}{99}\).

Answer: B.

hi Banuel. I can't understand why I should subtract the four triangles when it seems that I should add them to the area of the square. Please explain. Thanks.

Look at the figure below...the area of octagon is the coloured portion which is 1 - area of 4 similar triangles

The drawing is not to scale but I hope you get the point

Attachments

untitled.PNG [ 4.17 KiB | Viewed 1844 times ]

_________________

“If you can't fly then run, if you can't run then walk, if you can't walk then crawl, but whatever you do you have to keep moving forward.”

Re: Two squares, each of side lengths 1 unit and having their [#permalink]

Show Tags

06 Jul 2014, 09:29

Bunuel wrote:

RaviChandra wrote:

Two squares, each of side lengths 1 unit and having their centres at O, are rotated with respect to each other to generate octagon ABCDEFGH, as shown in the figure above. If AB = 43/99, find the area of the octagon.

Attachment:

G86.PNG

a. 73/99 b. 86/99 c. 1287/9801 d. 76/99

First note that all the triangles will have the same dimensions. Let the legs of these triangles be \(x\) and \(y\), also we know that the hypotenuse equals to \(\frac{43}{99}\), so \(x^2+y^2=(\frac{43}{99})^2\).

If we take one side of a square we'll see that \(x+y+\frac{43}{99}=1\) --> \(x+y=\frac{56}{99}\) --> square it --> \(x^2+2xy+y^2=(\frac{56}{99})^2\), as from above \(x^2+y^2=(\frac{43}{99})^2\), then: \((\frac{43}{99})^2+2xy=(\frac{56}{99})^2\) --> \(2xy=(\frac{56}{99})^2-(\frac{43}{99})^2=(\frac{56}{99}-\frac{43}{99})(\frac{56}{99}+\frac{43}{99})=\frac{13}{99}*1=\frac{13}{99}\);

Now, the are of the octagon will be area of a square minus area of 4 triangles --> \(area=1-4*(\frac{1}{2}*xy)=1-2xy=1-\frac{13}{99}=\frac{86}{99}\).

Answer: B.

Hi Bunuel,

I don't understand why we subtract only 4 triangle? Aren't we supposed to subtract 8 triangles?

Re: Two squares, each of side lengths 1 unit and having their [#permalink]

Show Tags

06 Jul 2014, 12:18

Expert's post

ronr34 wrote:

Bunuel wrote:

RaviChandra wrote:

Two squares, each of side lengths 1 unit and having their centres at O, are rotated with respect to each other to generate octagon ABCDEFGH, as shown in the figure above. If AB = 43/99, find the area of the octagon.

Attachment:

The attachment G86.PNG is no longer available

a. 73/99 b. 86/99 c. 1287/9801 d. 76/99

First note that all the triangles will have the same dimensions. Let the legs of these triangles be \(x\) and \(y\), also we know that the hypotenuse equals to \(\frac{43}{99}\), so \(x^2+y^2=(\frac{43}{99})^2\).

If we take one side of a square we'll see that \(x+y+\frac{43}{99}=1\) --> \(x+y=\frac{56}{99}\) --> square it --> \(x^2+2xy+y^2=(\frac{56}{99})^2\), as from above \(x^2+y^2=(\frac{43}{99})^2\), then: \((\frac{43}{99})^2+2xy=(\frac{56}{99})^2\) --> \(2xy=(\frac{56}{99})^2-(\frac{43}{99})^2=(\frac{56}{99}-\frac{43}{99})(\frac{56}{99}+\frac{43}{99})=\frac{13}{99}*1=\frac{13}{99}\);

Now, the are of the octagon will be area of a square minus area of 4 triangles --> \(area=1-4*(\frac{1}{2}*xy)=1-2xy=1-\frac{13}{99}=\frac{86}{99}\).

Answer: B.

Hi Bunuel,

I don't understand why we subtract only 4 triangle? Aren't we supposed to subtract 8 triangles?

Attachment:

Untitled.png [ 7.68 KiB | Viewed 1271 times ]

The area of yellow octagon = the area of blue square - the area of 4 red triangles.

Re: Two squares, each of side lengths 1 unit and having their [#permalink]

Show Tags

23 Sep 2014, 08:04

RaviChandra wrote:

muralimba wrote:

EASY WAY is as shown below AREA = .5*base*hiegt = 0.5*43/99 * 1/2 note: i/2 is the hieght as the length of a side of the given square is 1 and half of that is what is the hieght

This doesnt looks like a straight line i dont think i can be 0.5

Attachment:

G86.PNG

Can anyone input if this method is correct? I am also not sure that the line has to be straight. If the length of the hypotenuse of the triangle was more that half of the side of the square than I could agree. but it's not...

Re: Two squares, each of side lengths 1 unit and having their [#permalink]

Show Tags

17 Jan 2016, 00:24

Hello from the GMAT Club BumpBot!

Thanks to another GMAT Club member, I have just discovered this valuable topic, yet it had no discussion for over a year. I am now bumping it up - doing my job. I think you may find it valuable (esp those replies with Kudos).

Want to see all other topics I dig out? Follow me (click follow button on profile). You will receive a summary of all topics I bump in your profile area as well as via email. _________________

Part 2 of the GMAT: How I tackled the GMAT and improved a disappointing score Apologies for the month gap. I went on vacation and had to finish up a...

So the last couple of weeks have seen a flurry of discussion in our MBA class Whatsapp group around Brexit, the referendum and currency exchange. Most of us believed...

This highly influential bestseller was first published over 25 years ago. I had wanted to read this book for a long time and I finally got around to it...