bb11 wrote:
As for choosing between schools, it is really tough more me to discern the difference between most of the criteria. How much of the "Kellogg and Duke are better for marketing while Columbia and Stern are better for finance" talk is just stereotyping? How much of job placement statistics just comes from self-selection? Makes it hard for me to glean much.
Would love to hear some more feedback!!
Asimov gave you much to think about, so I'll just add on to your last comment. A lot of that is stereotyping, but there is some truth to it. For obvious reasons, finance recruiting at Columbia and Stern are going to be stronger than other schools, especially since a lot of applicants and students self-select into those schools based on having career goals in IBD/PE/VC in NYC. Do Columbia and Stern also have really strong marketing programs? Yes they do!
When it comes to the schools you are looking at, all of them will have great programs. Yes, marketing is super strong at Kellogg, but you can still go elsewhere and get a great marketing program with similar recruiting offerings at other places. What you have to consider is if all these schools are good fits for you -- do you want to be in the midwest vs New England vs the mid-Atlantic, do you want to work at the companies/roles that hire from these schools, do you like the curriculum at each (they ARE different), do you like the students? If you can, try to visit each and/or attend the admissions information sessions. They'll give you some more sense of the school as a whole versus what you read on the website.