Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.

It appears that you are browsing the GMAT Club forum unregistered!

Signing up is free, quick, and confidential.
Join other 350,000 members and get the full benefits of GMAT Club

Registration gives you:

Tests

Take 11 tests and quizzes from GMAT Club and leading GMAT prep companies such as Manhattan GMAT,
Knewton, and others. All are free for GMAT Club members.

Applicant Stats

View detailed applicant stats such as GPA, GMAT score, work experience, location, application
status, and more

Books/Downloads

Download thousands of study notes,
question collections, GMAT Club’s
Grammar and Math books.
All are free!

Thank you for using the timer!
We noticed you are actually not timing your practice. Click the START button first next time you use the timer.
There are many benefits to timing your practice, including:

for these who choose E, please elaborate why E is right.

otherwise, the answer given might be wrong.

Thanks

Well for each values of x, use Â½, -1/2, 2, -2, 3, -3 for trials and you will see how it is E. A little exhaustive but gives the right answer. .

OA can't be "E"...in ur values of X all ur +ve numbers do not satisfy both statements...1/2 doesn't satisfy state 2 and 2,3 don't satisfy state 1....only x < 0 satisfies both.

from i, x = more than any negative value that is less than 1= -ve and less than 1>.
from ii, x=either -ve or +ve but more than 1.
to satisfy both, x must less than 0 but more than -1 = -1<x<0
suppose x = -0.5,
from i, X^3<X^2
(-0.5)^3<(-0.5)^2
-0.125<0.25

from ii, X^3<X^4
(-0.5)^3<(-0.5)^4
-0.125<0.0625. therefore it is C.

for these who choose E, please elaborate why E is right.

otherwise, the answer given might be wrong.

Thanks

X<0? 1) X^3<X^2 2) X^3<X^4

From 1)

x^3 - x^2 <0 x^2(x-1)<0

==>> x^2<0 and (x-1)>0 (Since both of them cannot be negative)

or x^2>0 and (x-1)<0

So you cannot tell anything about x

from 2)

x^3(1-x)<0

Again the same logic

x^3<0 and (1-x)>0

or

x^3>0 and (1-x)<0

which again isnt sufficient.

Since(1) and (2) are giving multiple situations we cannot tell if x<0.

So I believe the answer is E.

Right approach, but x^2 can never be negative. We are talking about real numbers.

Assume x>0, then you can multiple the two equations, and you get:
x^6<x^6 which is impossible. In other words it is impossible that x>0. You know that x can't be equal to zero either. So x must be less than zero. (C). _________________

Keep on asking, and it will be given you;
keep on seeking, and you will find;
keep on knocking, and it will be opened to you.

Last edited by HongHu on 14 Apr 2005, 20:08, edited 1 time in total.

for these who choose E, please elaborate why E is right.

otherwise, the answer given might be wrong.

Thanks

X<0? 1) X^3<X^2 2) X^3<X^4

From 1)

x^3 - x^2 <0 x^2(x-1)<0

==>> x^2<0 and (x-1)>0 (Since both of them cannot be negative)

or x^2>0 and (x-1)<0

So you cannot tell anything about x

from 2)

x^3(1-x)<0

Again the same logic

x^3<0 and (1-x)>0

or

x^3>0 and (1-x)<0

which again isnt sufficient.

Since(1) and (2) are giving multiple situations we cannot tell if x<0.

So I believe the answer is E.

Right approach, but x^2 can never be negative. We are talking about real numbers.

Assume x>0, then you can multiple the two equations, and you get: x^6<x^6 which is impossible. In other words it is impossible that x>0. You know that x can be equal to zero either. So x must be less than zero. (C).

I would have cancelled x on both sides had this question came before I read your cameo on inqualities in this forum.Atleast the approach is right now.....Thanks HH