Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.
Customized for You
we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Track Your Progress
every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance
Practice Pays
we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Thank you for using the timer!
We noticed you are actually not timing your practice. Click the START button first next time you use the timer.
There are many benefits to timing your practice, including:
What do András from Hungary, Pablo from Mexico, Conner from the United States, Giorgio from Italy, Leo from Germany, and Rishab from India have in common? They all earned top scores on the GMAT Focus Edition using the Target Test Prep course!
Grab 20% off any Target Test Prep GMAT Focus plan during our Flash Sale. Just enter the coupon code FLASH20 at checkout to save up to $320. The offer ends on Tuesday, April 30.
After just 3 months of studying with the TTP GMAT Focus course, Conner scored an incredible 755 (Q89/V90/DI83) on the GMAT Focus. In this live interview, he shares how he achieved his outstanding 755 (100%) GMAT Focus score on test day.
In this conversation with Ankit Mehra, IESE MBA and CEO & Co-Founder, of GyanDhan, we will discuss how prospective MBA students can finance their MBA education with education loans and scholarships.
What do András from Hungary, Conner from the United States, Giorgio from Italy, Leo from Germany, and Saahil from India have in common? They all earned top scores on the GMAT Focus Edition using the Target Test Prep course!
Beginning in the 1950s, popular music was revolutionized by
[#permalink]
Updated on: 17 Feb 2011, 08:24
Show timer
00:00
A
B
C
D
E
Difficulty:
25%
(medium)
Question Stats:
94%
(01:33)
correct
6%
(01:26)
wrong
based on 34
sessions
HideShow
timer Statistics
3. Beginning in the 1950s, popular music was revolutionized by the electrification of musical instruments, which has enabled musicians to play with increased volume. Because individual musicians can play with increased volume, the average number of musicians per band has decreased. Nevertheless, electrification has increased rather than decreased the overall number of musicians who play popular music professionally.
Which one of the following is most strongly supported by the statements above, if those statements are true? (A) The number of amateur musicians who play popular music has decreased. (B) Most professional musicians are able to play both electric and nonelectric instruments. (C) The number of professional musicians in some bands has increased. (D) The total number of professional bands has increased as a result of electrification. (E) Many professional musicians play in more than one band.
this was hard for me, anyone care to break it down? i'll post the OA in the morning, that is when i wake up.
Archived Topic
Hi there,
This topic has been closed and archived due to inactivity or violation of community quality standards. No more replies are possible here.
Still interested in this question? Check out the "Best Topics" block below for a better discussion on this exact question, as well as several more related questions.
Re: Beginning in the 1950s, popular music was revolutionized by
[#permalink]
17 Feb 2011, 02:14
Answer is D for sure. It's a resolve the paradox saying that the no. of musicians per band is decreasing of electric instruments. In spite of this, the overall no. is increasing. This can only be true if the no. of bands increase.
Re: Beginning in the 1950s, popular music was revolutionized by
[#permalink]
17 Feb 2011, 10:18
1
Kudos
Nevertheless, electrification has increased rather than decreased the overall number of musicians who play popular music professionally.
Which one of the following is most strongly supported by the statements above, if those statements are true? (A) The number of amateur musicians who play popular music has decreased.[Weakens as it supports the decrease of number of ppl]
(B) Most professional musicians are able to play both electric and nonelectric instruments.[Weakens as it doesnt contribute to addition of number of pl whereas it point sto decrease of ppl playing music]
(C) The number of professional musicians in some bands has increased.[It says "some"]
(D) The total number of professional bands has increased as a result of electrification.[Nails the argument by providing an evident reason for increase in ppl , solves the paradox. ]
(E) Many professional musicians play in more than one band. [If many ppl play in more than one band tthen ppl shud be less not more , hence weakens]
Re: Beginning in the 1950s, popular music was revolutionized by
[#permalink]
17 Feb 2011, 15:13
Got this one pretty quickly. Here was my reasoning;
If the number of musicians in bands have decreased but the total number of musicians has increased, it be strong supporting evidence if the total number of bands increased. This would mean there would be more bands to empass the increased amount of musicians.
Re: Beginning in the 1950s, popular music was revolutionized by
[#permalink]
04 May 2011, 04:08
C states 'The number of professional musicians in some bands has increased' where is it stated by what number, and the constraint in this option is not that total number of bands has not increased. so logically this option should not be eliminated.
Re: Beginning in the 1950s, popular music was revolutionized by
[#permalink]
22 Jul 2011, 17:53
Going with D.
If the average number (of musicians in a band) goes down, the only way the total number of musicians will increase is if total number of bands increase. Hence D.
Still interested in this question? Check out the "Best Topics" block above for a better discussion on this exact question, as well as several more related questions.
Thank you for understanding, and happy exploring!
gmatclubot
Re: Beginning in the 1950s, popular music was revolutionized by [#permalink]